Posted on 09/05/2018 10:05:39 AM PDT by deplorableindc
The world's largest social media companies defended their decisions not to censor primary-source document publisher WikiLeaks, telling senators Wednesday the organization has done nothing that would justify being muzzled.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., extracted corporate explanations after calling WikiLeaks a "non-state hostile intelligence service" at an open hearing of the Senate intelligence committee.
Cotton asked Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg why they had not censored the document depot or its editor Julian Assange, an Australian-born critic of U.S. foreign policy.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., extracted corporate explanations after calling WikiLeaks a “non-state hostile intelligence service” at an open hearing of the Senate intelligence committee.
—
Give me a break. Wikileaks is one of the few non-filtered non-State sources of information.
The sad thing about the net is that I could put up a website totallyuncensored.com to replicate everything Facebook, Google, Twitter et al do and if no one uses it, or visits it it doesn’t matter.
I could publish the absolute truth on the JFK assassination, UFO news, the Clinton crime foundation, the Bushes ties to a one world government and not take one word down of it if it were true.
However again if no one uses it or visits it, it doesn’t matter.
The problem at its heart in this day in age is is there a fine line, non-existent line of user choice and monopoly when it comes to social networking and search. I don’t have an answer.
No one is making anyone type google.com, no one is forcing people to upload thousands of pictures and bits of personal information, every single thing these big tech companies has competition. Sure, in most cases inconsequential and inferior competition but competition.
Just like Amazon, where does the line between people choose to use it and monopoly blend or begin?
No one had a choice with AT&T, no one had a choice with Standard Oil, US Steel may have had massive market share but it was never a monopoly.
I hate what big tech has become, they more powerful than nation states, more dangerous than national intelligence services to individual privacy, unaccountable, unregulated and unassailable legally in many aspects that newspapers, magazines and broadcast outlets are.
All you can do is not use it but billions of people would sooner give up television than Facebook, Google and Twitter.
Cotton the irony challenged dumbass asking Facebook and Google what they know about non-state intelligence gathering?
Seriously? What an oblivious moron. They are sitting right in front of him.
Yeah, Tom Cotton just went down a few pegs in my estimation. The non-censoring of Wikileaks is not the problem here.
I believe that both the courts and Congress have addressed this issue, it just needs to be enforced. The SCOTUS ruled in Marsh v. Alabama that when a private entity in any given situation has the same kind of power to censor that we would typically associate with a government, then they must refrain from impinging on free speech, the same as a government would. Congress gave all internet platforms that don’t publish their own content a pass on libel laws, for the specific reason that they’re not in control of their content. The same logic should prevent them from censoring legal content. We don’t have to “regulate” them in any other way other than to prevent them from censoring legal content.
Social media giants censor conservatives. Congress investigates and says what they’re really upset about is that they didn’t censor wikileaks too. Because nobody needed to know about that whole rigged dem primary thing, really.
“The world’s largest social media companies defended their decisions not to censor primary-source document publisher WikiLeaks, telling senators Wednesday the organization has done nothing that would justify being muzzled.”
We don’t want to “muzzle” you; we want guarantees that you will allow freedom of speech for all political views. What’s so hard to understand about that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.