TRUMP DEMANDS NYT GIVE UP ANONYMOUS OFFICIAL FOR ‘NATIONAL SECURITY’ REASONS

Daily Caller ^ | 8/5/2018 | Saagar Enjeti

[DoughtyOne]

Oh for crap sake. Take a breath and settle down.

For knowing what we do about rampant criminal activity taking place and not doing a damned thing about it.

He’s essentially an accessory after the fact. He’s running cover for Leftists who are breaking serious laws.

I’m tired of it.

Arrest the son-of-a-bitch and move on.

[2harddrive]

I say the whole thing is Fake News...a HOAX by disgruntled DemocRATS! Journalistic “ethics” = oxymoron!

[Architect of Avalon]

Make it happen Mr. President.

[Cloverfarm]

I blush to admit that years ago I was a news reporter. Nothing big time. Small town daily, which in a way is as real as it gets.

Company policy was anonymous sources had to be identified to managing editor and publisher.

The paper’s biggest asset was its credibility and the top editors weren’t going to throw it away.

[eyeamok]

National Security reasons, they can be held without reason thanks to the Patriot Act.

[The Pack Knight]

National Security reasons, they can be held without reason thanks to the Patriot Act.

Despite what the tinfoil hat crowd and Michael Moore Patriot Act says nothing of the sort, and it would be plainly unconstitutional if it did.

And what national security reasons?

[bert]

The publisher of the syphilitic Old Gray Whore is not protected by the first amendment from charges of criminal conspiracy to obstruct governance

[The Pack Knight]

Oh for crap sake. Take a breath and settle down.

For knowing what we do about rampant criminal activity taking place and not doing a damned thing about it.

He’s essentially an accessory after the fact. He’s running cover for Leftists who are breaking serious laws.

I’m tired of it.

Arrest the son-of-a-bitch and move on.

And I'm tired of people falsely claiming Trump is some sort of authoritarian fascist, but here you are urging that he behave exactly like an authoritarian fascist. If the President doesn't like what Sessions is doing, he can fire him, not arrest him.

Luckily, the President is smart enough not to listen to your sort of advice.

[DoughtyOne]

LOL

Exactly where did you see me suggest Trump should arrest Sessions?

What I suggested is that Sessions is in fact by default allowing known criminals of the highest magnitude to walk freely among us doing still more harm to the nation.

Arresting him would be the job of the next AG.

I consider him to be as dangerous as any of the people he is refusing to indict. He is enabling each of them to continue what they have been doing.

[The Pack Knight]

You suggested that someone arrest Sessions, but for what, I’m still not clear. “[A]llowing known criminals of the highest magnitude to walk freely among us doing still more harm to the nation” is not a crime.

[DoughtyOne]

Well, you may not see it as a crime, but I do.

If you have the ability to stop major crime and you don’t, you’re nothing more than a willing accomplice.

He should be put on the payroll.