Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let's Say Bob Woodward Is Right, How Then Should We Vote?
https://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2018/09/14/if-bob-woodward-is-right-how-should-we-vote-n2518987 ^ | 09/14/2018 | Michael Brown

Posted on 09/14/2018 8:11:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

If Bob Woodward’s Trump-bashing, mega-bestseller is true, how should conservatives vote in the midterms? If the White House is in chaos, led by an unqualified and out of control president, what course should we take on November 6?

Woodward speaks of “a nervous breakdown of the executive power of the most powerful country in the world.” And he describes Trump as “an emotionally overwrought, mercurial and unpredictable leader.”

The infamous, anonymous op-ed piece in the New York Times spoke of Trump’s leadership style, “impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective” and claimed he was “amoral.”

Yes, we are told, “Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.”

What if these charges are true? Should Trump supporters hang their heads in shame and stay home in November? Should conservatives throw in the towel and capitulate to the inevitable demise of the Trump White House?

Not a chance. Now, more than ever, conservatives should get out and vote. Here are four reasons why.

First, we are not voting for a new president. Donald Trump is the duly elected, 45th president of our nation, and the next presidential vote doesn’t come until 2020.

Consequently, regardless of his behavior, this vote is not directly about him. It’s about other issues, about a larger agenda, about campaign promises that are important to many of us. Why in the world would we not want to vote to see those promises kept?

So, while we are not voting for a president, we are voting for congressmen who can thwart or advance the president’s agenda. And if anything has been clear over the last two years it’s that Trump has tried to deliver on many of his pledges and commitments.

The question, then, is simple: Would we be better off with a president who is empowered to continue to push forward with a conservative agenda or by a president who is hamstrung? Would we be better off with radical leftists dominating the House and Senate or with conservatives holding their ground?

That’s what the midterms are about.

In short, our vote is not a specific endorsement of the man Donald Trump. Our vote is a call to continue to advance an ideological agenda (while, at the same time, voting against a very different, even dangerous ideological agenda). And since this is about advancing an agenda, the president’s demeanor and leadership style are not the major issue.

Again, I’m not downplaying the concerns. I’m simply putting them in their proper place. Many of those who held their noses when they voted for Trump have been pleasantly surprised by the good he has done while getting what they expected on the negative side.

The midterm elections are about helping him do more good.

Conversely, if we choose not to vote, we will not thereby bring about any change in the man, Donald Trump, himself. How, then, does our non-vote help?

Second, we must remember who wants us to stay home.

It is militant pro-abortionists who despise the pro-life movement. It is unashamed socialists who see capitalism as the enemy. It is sexual revolutionaries who abhor our biblical values. It is the deeply biased “masters of the universe” who want to suppress our voices online and in the public square. It is the leftwing media, already forecasting the inevitable blue wave.

Who will be smiling if conservatives, by the millions, decide not to vote in November?

Third, if Republicans lose the House (or, even more significantly, the Senate), this would only plunge our nation into greater turmoil and conflict. How in the world will this make things better?

Talk about chaos. The next two years would likely be chaos personified.

Put another way, if you’re genuinely concerned that President Trump is about to explode (or implode), by not voting (or by voting Democrat), you are doing nothing to stop this explosion (or implosion).

Conversely, if you can surround the president with good men and women, people of principle and character and conviction who share his values, you can help forestall a feared collapse. (Again, I’m not predicting any such collapse is coming. I’m simply addressing this mindset.)

Fourth, you can maintain your integrity (and your Christian testimony!) while voting for a pro-Trump agenda, since politics is not the gospel.

You are not pledging your soul to a party. You are not hitching your personal salvation to a leader (as emphasized in the title of my forthcoming book). You are not looking to a political party to bring about moral transformation or spiritual awakening.

You are voting to strengthen our national security. To keep our economy growing. To appoint constitutionally-based justices to the courts. To stand against radical LGBT activism. To preserve religious freedoms.

And if you put aside the daily scandals and controversies and accusations (from the Mueller investigation to the payment of porn-stars to the latest tell-all book) – in short, if you put away the drama – it’s clear that President Trump has accomplished a lot that is good.

The midterm elections are about saying, “Let that good continue!”

Why in the world would you want to stay home?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bloggers; bobwoodward; nevertrump; nevertrumper; nevertrumpers; voting; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: GOPJ
Have you noticed 'the press' has stopped using camera filters to make Trump's skin look orange?

I have not. But I don't watch TV, so little of the MSM bilge seeps into my brain.

41 posted on 09/14/2018 9:21:25 AM PDT by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The infamous, anonymous op-ed piece in the New York Times spoke of Trump’s leadership style, “impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective” and claimed he was “amoral.”

That NYT Op-Ed dovetails too nicely with Woodward's book. Suppose hw wrote it?

42 posted on 09/14/2018 9:29:54 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’s lying. Don’t accept the premise from these mutts.


43 posted on 09/14/2018 9:36:22 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberal is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bob Woodward = SpongeBob Squidward


44 posted on 09/14/2018 9:43:16 AM PDT by AlexisHeavyMetal1981 (Z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Did they allege that POTUS Trump spends his nights in the White House talking to Eleanor Roosevelt’s Portrait?


45 posted on 09/14/2018 9:46:01 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Clearly, if the book is true, and if the anonymous op-ed is true, we need to elect MORE republicans, and we need more senators so we can get people confirmed to positions who will then be in positions to protect us from these ‘nefarious trump impulses’.

The last thing we need is to put democrats in charge, who will just push him over hte edge and make things worse.

:)


46 posted on 09/14/2018 9:55:03 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I matters not to me what Woodward says about Trump's WH in the 2018 midterms or the 2020 presidential race.

I'll vote for Trump candidates, even GOP RINO's in the midterms, because we have to keep control of the House. In 2020, if Trump is running, he has my vote already, Bob Woodward or not.

Since when has a controversial Leftist reporter had sway over my vote?

Never.

47 posted on 09/14/2018 10:23:26 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

We need more of that “chaos.”


48 posted on 09/14/2018 11:28:29 AM PDT by arthurus (saupoiuytrewq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: punknpuss
He is the anti-politician politician.
49 posted on 09/14/2018 12:27:57 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson