Skip to comments.Game-Changer: Kavanaugh Accuser Linked to Anita Hill Hit Job on Clarence Thomas
Posted on 09/22/2018 1:35:07 PM PDT by Mariner
When NeverTrump pundit Erick Erickson suggested that the accusation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford was the result of a PR job, there was both laughter and disdain from the left.
There isnt much mirth or contempt now that its been revealed who Judge Kavanaughs accuser has retained.
According to Politico, Christine Blasey Ford the 51-year-old California psychologist who says the Supreme Court nominee sexually assaulted her while they were in high school in Maryland is receiving advice from Democrat activist Ricki Seidman.
Seidman, a senior principal at TSD Communications, in the past worked as an investigator for Sen. Ted Kennedy, and was involved with Anita Hills decision to testify against Supreme Court Nominee Clarence Thomas, Politico reported.
She also worked as Joe Bidens communications director during the 2008 general election campaign, after he was named Barack Obamas running mate. In 2009, according to her online biography, she helped the White House manage the confirmation of Obamas Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. Before that, she worked in the Clinton White House as deputy communications director, the report said.
And thats not all. When President Ronald Reagan appointed Judge Robert Bork to the nations highest court, Seidman played a key role helping kill the appointment.
As legal director for Norman Lears People for the American Way, she was responsible for the infamous attack-ad on the judicial record of Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork, The Weekly Standard reported in 1996. She next moved to Senator Edward Kennedys office shortly after Clarence Thomas was nominated to the Supreme Court, and she is credited with pressuring the reluctant Anita Hill to come out with her harassment story. When the Judiciary Committee failed to listen, according to David Brocks The Real Anita Hill, Seidman helped leak...
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
It was a hit job out of the gate, planned months ago.
This attorney was involved with The Great Borking, the hit on Thomas and now the Ford hit on Kavanaugh.
Scandalous if Republicans do not call this out in any hearing, should it occur.
Debra Katz and Rikki Seiden are both a complete disgrace to the Jewish people. Some Jews never stop dancing around the golden calf. May G-d smite them for their disrespect to Hashem at the appropriate time.
Old news that didn’t change the game.
This is how the dark deep state operates. If only there was an email or a recorded conversation somewhere that proved it beyond a doubt.
The connection with two other Borkings, and now associated with a third, was known to you long ago?
The thing is no one will see this. There was an audio recording of Rici what ever her name is saying
there was an event that is aimed at derailing Kaanaugh but you think the media will show it no way.
Daily Caller has it:
I connected the dots within days of this BS accusation. I knew it was nothing but a plan from the start to ruin Kavanaugh’s chances of being on the Supreme Court..its all about destroying ANYONE that does not fit the Commie agenda..for Commies the Supreme Court must go full Commie in order to turn America Communist
Game changer? Ha! Democrats have the narrative and are winning thus far. Well see what happens. The woman is walking all over Grassley.
Surprise? America-haters getting together to cooperate to ruin this country. No surprise there.
Read it on several previous threads.
The bio for the author is puzzling:
Writing under a pseudonym, Cillian Zeal is a conservative writer who is currently living abroad in a country that doesn’t value free speech and exercising it would put him in danger.
Old and well-known news. There are a number of threads here on FR over the past week regarding the people that Dr. Ford is working with.
Article is dated yesterday and posted yesterday.
[ It was a hit job out of the gate, planned months ago. ]
Of course. She’s a Democrat operative.
This charade began and will end when Republicans recognize and counter the Liberal/Progressive's all-out war to preserve their quest for imposing socialism on the American population, along with the bottom-line necessity for socialism: population control.
" Dr. Kathi Aultman told a U.S. Congressional committee in 2017 that she referred to unborn babies as 'fetuses' when killing them in abortions but 'babies' when they were wanted; and she regretted the incongruity. She also said she was fascinated by the 'tiny but perfectly formed limbs, intestines, kidneys, and other organs' of aborted babies."
Aultman, in the first clause of her statement summarizes the semantic trickery Liberals/Progressives knowingly used to implement their takeover of the minds of American citizens before 1973 in order to impose their population control method of destroying babies in order to facilitate the goals of socialism for America.
Please note especially the first paragraph highlighted and quoted below from the Liberty Fund Library "A Plea for Liberty: An Argument Against Socialism and Socialistic Legislation," edited by Thomas Mackay (1849 - 1912), Chapter 1, final paragraphs from Edward Stanley Robertson's essay, "The Impracticability of Socialism":
Note the writer's emphasis that the "scheme of Socialism" requires what he calls "the power of restraining the increase in population"--long the essential and primary focus of the Democrat Party in the U. S.:"I have suggested that the scheme of Socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes a power of restraining the increase of population, which power is so unwelcome to Englishmen that the very mention of it seems to require an apology. I have showed that in France, where restraints on multiplication have been adopted into the popular code of morals, there is discontent on the one hand at the slow rate of increase, while on the other, there is still a 'proletariat,' and Socialism is still a power in politics.An examination of the history of nations reveals the long and arduous struggle by human beings for individual liberty--from kings, from masters, from whatever description fitted those other human beings who gained power and exercised it over their fellow citizens.
"I have put the question, how Socialism would treat the residuum of the working class and of all classesthe class, not specially vicious, nor even necessarily idle, but below the average in power of will and in steadiness of purpose. I have intimated that such persons, if they belong to the upper or middle classes, are kept straight by the fear of falling out of class, and in the working class by positive fear of want. But since Socialism purposes to eliminate the fear of want, and since under Socialism the hierarchy of classes will either not exist at all or be wholly transformed, there remains for such persons no motive at all except physical coercion. Are we to imprison or flog all the 'ne'er-do-wells'?
"I began this paper by pointing out that there are inequalities and anomalies in the material world, some of which, like the obliquity of the ecliptic and the consequent inequality of the day's length, cannot be redressed at all. Others, like the caprices of sunshine and rainfall in different climates, can be mitigated, but must on the whole be endured. I am very far from asserting that the inequalities and anomalies of human society are strictly parallel with those of material nature. I fully admit that we are under an obligation to control nature so far as we can. But I think I have shown that the Socialist scheme cannot be relied upon to control nature, because it refuses to obey her. Socialism attempts to vanquish nature by a front attack. Individualism, on the contrary, is the recognition, in social politics, that nature has a beneficent as well as a malignant side. The struggle for life provides for the various wants of the human race, in somewhat the same way as the climatic struggle of the elements provides for vegetable and animal lifeimperfectly, that is, and in a manner strongly marked by inequalities and anomalies. By taking advantage of prevalent tendencies, it is possible to mitigate these anomalies and inequalities, but all experience shows that it is impossible to do away with them. All history, moreover, is the record of the triumph of Individualism over something which was virtually Socialism or Collectivism, though not called by that name. In early days, and even at this day under archaic civilisations, the note of social life is the absence of freedom. But under every progressive civilisation, freedom has made decisive stridesbroadened down, as the poet says, from precedent to precedent. And it has been rightly and naturally so.
"Freedom is the most valuable of all human possessions, next after life itself. It is more valuable, in a manner, than even health. No human agency can secure health; but good laws, justly administered, can and do secure freedom. Freedom, indeed, is almost the only thing that law can secure. Law cannot secure equality, nor can it secure prosperity. In the direction of equality, all that law can do is to secure fair play, which is equality of rights but is not equality of conditions. In the direction of prosperity, all that law can do is to keep the road open. That is the Quintessence of Individualism, and it may fairly challenge comparison with that Quintessence of Socialism we have been discussing. Socialism, disguise it how we may, is the negation of Freedom. That it is so, and that it is also a scheme not capable of producing even material comfort in exchange for the abnegations of Freedom, I think the foregoing considerations amply prove." EDWARD STANLEY ROBERTSON
By whatever semantic maneuver those power holders chose to identify themselves, no matter how benevolent they purported to be, the end was the same: some individuals in the society or group were denied their Creator-endowed rights to be free. Today, the individuals most denied their freedom are those innocent lives in the womb who, if wanted, are called "children," and if, for some reason are inconvenient at the time, are called "fetuses," as Aultman averred.
Zero game change.
Even with Wed. agreed to she’ll show up on Thurs and demand to be heard. It’s a set up. And next thing she’ll be on 60 Minutes get soft ball questions with all the media and she’ll be the new Joan of Arch for the feminists against Trump and the “old white men.” It’s all an election ploy.
If she is really going to testify, she should have NO, meaning ZERO, legal counsel coaching her. We have all heard this statement, “The truth will set you free”, having a bottom sucking attorney’s arms wrapped around you telling what you can/should/should not say should be stricken. If she can answer truthfully, it’s over. Call for the vote immediately.
These GOPe leadership roles have to be dispensed. We need real conservatives in Leadership-PERIOD!!
They are both dykes, too, aren’t they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.