Posted on 09/23/2018 1:59:41 AM PDT by Kaslin
“There’s money to be made doing speeches to Democrat women’s groups, personal appearances, eternal seminars on abused women, maybe an abused woman foundation, definitely a tax-exempt non-profit, appointments to boards.......”
Anita Hill has certainly done well.
This, supposedly, is her biography:
>It makes no mention of her alcohol abuse and promiscuity (at the age of 15, continuing through high school and beyond). These are considered by the elites immaterial. These would be immaterial if there were reasonable cause to believe K. assaulted her. But, the only “evidence” against K. is the recovered memory of a person who had been abusing alcohol and having sex with boys indiscriminately. Of the few concrete details she provides, the names of the other persons at this party, every one of them denies there was any such part. Her recovered memory is, therefore, contradicted.
This whole thing should have been kept confidential.
If this found to be a hoax it needs to be addressed and all involved need to be prosecuted
And the more she thought of a Republican pro-life Catholic on the USSC, the more violent her memories of the incident surfaced.
We may learn from Ford's now-flowering "repressed memory:"
<><> her attacker was heavily armed, had an AK-47 strapped to his back,
<><> pointed a snub-nosed Luger at her demanding she submit,
<><> was not into diversity,
<><> hated kale and green smoothies,
<><> tortured animals,
<><> refused to name the nearest abortion clinic in case she got pregnant
<><> and the most horrific.......
<><> insisted she use a plastic straw.
What is wrong with Sen. Chuck Grassley? Ford's demands do not stand either the "law" test or the "smell" test....this is about as bad as Pelosi's Mar 09, 2010 "We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It".
That was really dumb and this accusation against Bret Kavanaugh is dumber. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Get on with it Sen. Grassley.
One who drinks enough to blackout is more prone to do a lot of things they might later regret-—with a lot of people...and to protect themselves from their own memories of their ‘escapades”, they are prone to try to make crap up that would have taken their own prerogative/willingness to be that way away from them and lay the blame on some other party. Don’t have to be a psycho-ologist to know that.
I went through therapy myself a number of years ago. My health plan agreed to ten sessions. Never did the therapist get into having me talk about my high school years or wallowing in past memories, for such a treatment plan would be counterproductive to reacting to the present and helping me develop healthy reactions to present problems. Therefore I can’t understand a therapy program where a patient is encouraged to focus on unpleasant past memories, wallow in them and expand upon them to an extent false memories could be created and the incident could be magnified in the person’s mind, as a way of helping the person to move forward in the present. It sounds like a horror movie scenario to me. Bette Davis and Joan Crawford could play these roles in an oldtime Hollywood movie.
Oh, Liz! So shortsighted.
Her legal team is laughing all the way to the bank, not her.
Back in high school in the 70s there were girls like Ford and EVERYONE knew their proclivities. Something reletively benign like she describes would have happened a hell of a lot more than once. Guys hoping she’d fold easy would swarm around these girls. These girls are exactly the type who would wind up alone in a house with 3 or 4 guys.
I distinctly recall being at my first birthday party, but strangely enough the only memory I have is the moment a group picture was taken.
IOW, after looking at the picture over the years, I have developed a false memory of being there (I was only a one-y.o., so unlikely)
I’ve done that with historical events that happened before i was born.
I’ve seen them so many time on videos i starting thinking i must have been alive when that took place.
I once got dismissed from jury duty when I told the attorney that, based on 3 incidents in my own past, I would buy anything an eyewitness said when HELL froze over solid. In my view eyewitness is shorthand for clueless asshole.
Doesnt seem to matter. Didnt with Crystal Mangum in the Duke Lacrosse scandal. Very sad society no longer reasons.
When I was 15 I was hugged a long each time twice by a relatives husband. Once he gave me a drink. A whiskey sour. Nothing else, just long close hugging. I remember exactly where and under what circumstances each occurred.
Occam’s razor says she made it up.
Anita Hill didnt do so bad....and Ford already scored over $100 thou in Gofundme.
I have significant respect for the person who did this research. It lets them say we’re not calling you a liar, but the LITTLE evidence you gave says there is reasonable doubt you’re wrong on the person to blame - it is probably someone else, here’s a suspect.
FORMER SCALIA LAW CLERK Drops Pictures and Evidence That Blows Christine Fords Case Wide Open
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/former-scalia-law-clerk-drops-pictures-and-evidence-that-blows-christine-fords-case-wide-open/
That lets them say you may be right of what happened (though this is likely a political hit job), but you’re wrong about it being Kavanaugh.
Also how many abortions.
I believe an assault occured, possibly just like she says but I think she plugged Kavanaugh in as the assailant when it was some other John Doe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.