Posted on 09/23/2018 1:59:41 AM PDT by Kaslin
“Similar to lie-detector tests.”
A polygraph expert — former FBI, I think — was interviewed on Fox. He said there’s no such thing as a “lie detector”. He said they’re polygraphs and aren’t meant to detect lies necessarily. They just register reactions to verbal stimuli. Lies could be one trigger, but so could several other things.
I thought that was interesting. In true crime situations I’ve noticed that they’re only about 50% accurate when it comes to lies. How many people have been falsely maligned due to faulty polygraphs?
The new method that “reads” people’s voices might be more accurate.
Sorry Kaslin, but what happened with your cutting and pasting? LOL. e.g. “Our talk inevitably circled back to the fact that we just “don’t know” so many things about this case.”
Witness #4 has come forward and denied Ford’s accusation, National Review has #3
Third Named Witness Rejects Kavanaugh’s Accuser’s Allegations
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/third-named-witness-rejects-kavanaughs-accusers-allegations/
I always cut and paste. It would take way to long if I didn’t.
“Doesn’t seem to matter. Didn’t with Crystal Mangum in the Duke Lacrosse scandal. Very sad society no longer reasons. “
She is now in prison, convicted for murdering her boyfriend.
But look what her lies did to those college guys and the left wanted so much to believe her. Maybe Ford will end up the same.
Emotional decision makers don’t care about facts. They only see the facts that support their decision.
It used to be, “I’ll believe it if I see it.”
Now it’s “I can only see it if I believe it.”
I'm guessing that she was in the same classes that 0bama attended at Harvard Law School. Maybe she was the supplier to the Choom Gang? And I don't mean the marijuana...
There is nothing wrong with cutting and pasting... somehow you repeated part of the same section three different times. That made your excerpt confusing.
Not true.
Maybe we wait until some reliable facts come out.
She's not in them.
Bear in mind that much of what we think we know about that comes from highly unreliable anonymous tweets and comments.
I checked for radio host Howie Carr, too. He wasn’t in the yearbooks. Not everybody wants to go through the picture-taking routine.
I checked under maiden name....
It’s possible that she graduated at one of the UNC satellite locations...Greensboro, Wilmington, Asheville....
“Maybe we should wait until some reliable facts come out.”
NO, I repeat, NO reliable facts have come out.
“Recovered memories” that are not corroborated by facts, but are contradicted in every alleged fact, are not reliable facts. We don’t have a date and we don’t have a place, those lack of facts can’t be contradicted. We do have four names of other people at this party, one of whom is a lifetime friend of the accuser. Each of the four denies any such party ever took place.
The proper way to handle a matter like this is to report it to the police. Law enforcement should treat the accuser with respect and confidentiality, confidentiality until and unless probable cause is developed. Law enforcement should determine if there is corroborating evidence, and even try to develop corroborating evidence based on leads in the recovered memory. If there is no corroborating evidence, you don’t subject the accuser and the accused to a trial. You tell the accused that the information provided will be kept on file, whether for this case if it is reopened or for a future case.
Recovered memories have helped solve some cases but they also have sent people to prison who were later proven innocent. They were the hot item for about ten years about thirty years ago. Legislatures lengthened statutes of limitation because of this new tool available to law enforcement. But, troubles developed, and the technique generally became inadmissable, at least without corroboration (see the following link).
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/so-sue-me/201602/how-does-the-law-treat-repressed-memories
If we’re going to speculate about a man based only on recovered memory, we should be able to speculate about those recovered memories. They are the recovered memories of a 15 year girl who was at an alcohol party at somebody else’s home when the parents weren’t home. Those facts are in the allegation itself. Then, in the accuser’s yearbook, are multiple stories of such alcohol parties and of sexual promiscuity.
But, we’re not talking of due process are we?
About the supposed incident, no. And we may never find out what happened or didn't happen.
I was talking about all the "drunken slut" background stuff which seems to be based on some very questionable anonymous sources.
Maybe it's all true. Maybe it isn't. Probably the truth is somewhere in between.
When people cite sources that aren't trustworthy they don't make a convincing case.
x, you may operate on the basis that the truth probably lies somewhere in between. Here’s my operating principle: presumption of innocence. I’m a due process guy.
Regarding whether the accuser was at an alcohol party at a home where the parents were not present when she was age 15, I agree with you, her recovered memory could be a total fabrication.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.