Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stop This Idiocy And Confirm Him
Townhall.com ^ | September 24, 2024 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 09/23/2018 10:31:50 PM PDT by Kaslin

As I write this, the “I really, really wanna testify, but…” goalpost has moved west right past my house and out over the Pacific Ocean. You get the distinct impression that Christine Ford’s handlers are making it up as they go along – “She can’t testify on Monday because, I dunno, she’s afraid of airplanes. Yeah, that’s a thing now.” 

The GOP is, as usual, afraid to be seen as insufficiently submissive. We have Chuck Grassley announcing, by tweets that sound like they were composed by a twelve-year-old texting her girlfriends after breaking into mom’s cooking sherry, that he’s ready to roll over yet again. The only way this could get worse is if the crusty Iowan discovered emojis:

Sorry Brett gotta postpone ur vote until 2021 cuz reasons [Sad Face] [Blue Wave] [Poop].”

No. Hold the vote, confirm Kavanaugh, and then let him set about making the libs sorry they ever pulled this stunt.

I am not alone in my disgust and desire to fight this appalling atrocity. There is a weird disconnect between the elite and normal Americans on the Kavanaugh smear issue and so many others, as I chronicle in my book Militant Normals: How Regular Americans Are Rebelling Against the Elite to Reclaim Our Democracy, which drops next week (Pre-order it right this second so all 288-pages of the kind of liberal and Fredocon abuse you enjoy here at Townhall, but with more swears, will be delivered to you fresh from the furnace on October 2). Within the elite bubble, the Republican gimps are carefully trying to pretend that they should respect this bizarre and uncorroborated tale of convenience by a liberal activist while out in America, Normal people are all, “Nah, I don’t buy it. Confirm him.

Leave it to our unelite elite to be willingly grifted by this nonsense, and watch them bend over backwards to avoid saying what any Normal person would say – “No.”

AFTER THREE MONTHS OF PREPARING, I CAN’T POSSIBLY TESTIFY MONDAY.”

How about we move it from Monday to Wednesday?

STOP BULLYING ME!

"We’re sorry! We want to hear your story.

THEN WHERE’S MY PONY?

We have a pony for you. He’s a nice pony. His name is Tim.

BUT WHERE’S HIS HORN? I ASKED FOR A UNICORN! NOT GIVING ME A UNICORN IS MISOGYNY AT ITS WORST!

Okay, instead of Tim, this is Chet the unicorn…”

STOP SILENCING ME BY TRYING TO HAVE ME TESTIFY!

This woman’s performance rider has more provisions than Van Halen’s. If she ever does show up – maybe she’s in her Prius scooting across the country as we speak, along with her unicorn – she’ll probably walk out when she discovers the witness table candy bowl contains brown M&Ms.

It doesn’t help that the rules about what does and doesn’t disqualify someone from something seem to be – let me be charitable – in flux.

We keep hearing about how we’re supposed to believe women making accusations without bothering to confirm them, as if the Duke lacrosse team and the UVA frat frauds didn’t happen, and as if every few weeks we don’t see another story of some poor sucker walking out of jail after doing a decade in the stoney lonesome because some chick got buzzed, got busy, then decided to call the cops rather than let her BF find out she was tramping around. But Normals get it. They understand life isn’t the black-and-white, Manichean SJW paradigm where all girls are angels and all boys are monsters. And they wonder why the “Well, some woman said you were bad so you’re ruined” principle – there’s that weasel word again, principle – only seems to apply to Normals and those Normals like.

Let’s review liberalism’s greatest hits, literally. Keith Ellison, right now. Bill Clinton’s chivalrous “Better put some ice on that.” Ted Kennedy’s confirmed kill. Bob Menendez, trolling for jailbait in the Caribbean. Tom Carper allegedly slapping around his wife. Sherrod Brown’s wife said in a filing (I assume it was sworn) that he manhandled her in 1986 – as an adult, and several years more recently than whenever the Kavanaugh thing supposedly happened. Oh, but wait, now the ex-Mrs. Brown is walking it back. So, either Ohio’s Champion of the Chicks beat on her, or she lied about it, which we’re told never ever happens, you misogynist monster for even thinking that. Both possibilities kind of detonate the narrative.

Except they don’t, because the narrative is a lie. 

Even if true, should this disqualify Kavanaugh 36 years later, after an indisputably pristine and exemplary life (the total lack of anyone else making this kind of allegation is powerful evidence her accusation is false; Normals know that pervs always re-perv)?

Libs manifestly would not care if it was one of their own, and their double standard is unacceptable. Choose one rule and stick to it. The fact is that such acts only act to bar those who Normals support. Let’s look at yet another Democrat with car trouble, Tex Kennedy. Beto got hammered at 26, drove into traffic, and tried to run from the cops. But that’s okay, apparently. We’re supposed to forgive and forget the undisputed act of an adult who nearly killed people then split. That doesn’t disqualify him from office? Why is that?

What’s the rule? You can slap around your spouse as an adult, and you get a pass? Credible rape claims as an adult, and hail to the chief? Leave a woman to drown, as an adult, a senator, and you’re the Lion of the Senate? Booze it up and hit the gas – as an adult – but who cares?

That seems incongruous. Gosh, what’s the common thread between all these malefactors? Adults, Democrats, up to kill babies. Gee, I’m seeing a pattern. But minor, Republican, not wanting to kill babies – unforgiveable!

“Oh, you can’t do whataboutism!” hiss the Cheese-eating surrendercons. Baloney. Whataboutism is a moral necessity, because it disarms the hypocrisy the left wields like a battle axe by illustrating the undeniable truth. Democrats don’t care if Kavanaugh grabbed that girl, and they don’t really think it should disqualify him if he had. They just don’t want him on the Supreme Court because that will make them lose power. And power is all they care about.

So, if Brett Kavanaugh and his family must be ruined, well, they deserve it for getting in the left’s way. That will teach people to resist them. And your sons, whose lives can be wrecked by a single lie under the new Gillibrand-Hirono Standard, are next.

No. Stop this charade. Vote. Confirm Kavanaugh. And then let us Normals get on with the business of rebelling against the liberal elite


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: abortion; brettkavanaugh; brettkavenaugh; california; calstatefullerton; christineblaseyford; confirmation; lyinglimolib; maga; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Kaslin

The good Dr. Christine Ford .... I’d recognize that raccoon anywhere.

21 posted on 09/24/2018 12:45:54 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (duct tape and cable ties hold more worth more than pussy hats and resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

LOL


22 posted on 09/24/2018 12:47:17 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (duct tape and cable ties hold more worth more than pussy hats and resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Enough! Vote!


23 posted on 09/24/2018 1:29:00 AM PDT by trustandobey (#wanttoknow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trustandobey

They need to vote now or there will be hundreds of accusers by the November mid terms. GOP better fight the Witch Hunters right now....


24 posted on 09/24/2018 2:49:09 AM PDT by blackberry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m hoping that the USSC, in its wisdom, adjusts their calendar to accomodate a later vote on Kavanaugh....perhaps doing reviews for the first 30 days....and all within the scope of the rules of the court.


25 posted on 09/24/2018 3:16:16 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

By Wednesday Ford will say she can’t testify until these new allegations are investigated. Grassley will cave again and Flake and Collins will agree.


26 posted on 09/24/2018 4:17:15 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

The years have not been kind.


27 posted on 09/24/2018 4:22:44 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker
The years have not been kind.

_________

LOL ...... her "smile" looks so artificial and forced. But years surfing in the sun have made her skin age more.

But, I think that girl/woman is not nice inside. And nothing will get rid of those close-together raccoon eyes.

(I feel so petty.)

;-)

28 posted on 09/24/2018 4:31:23 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (duct tape and cable ties hold more worth more than pussy hats and resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

it’s a complete farce. take the vote. if the RINOS vote against, so be it.

the Kavanaugh family - and the country - shouldn’t have to endure any more of this garbage.
why wasn’t the woman simply told to go to the police in the first place?


29 posted on 09/24/2018 5:22:29 AM PDT by MAGAthon (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Russ

The only way to overcome this is to immediately subpoena these woman and make them testify under oath. They do NOT have a right to refuse and can be held in contempt....which I believe is criminal.


30 posted on 09/24/2018 5:23:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
If the statute of limitations does not exist in Maryland, why doesn't she take the legal route and submit a complaint with LEOs in that state. If she can find a prosecutor that is foolish enough to file a case, she may get her investigation. (but very doubtful)

Since this is a political hit, they forced her to take the senate route to impugn Judge Kavanaugh. Unless she can add solid evidence or provide corroborating witnesses, all she can do is repeat her accusation. This obviously does not justify the delay of senate business.

The “hearing” should be canceled and the vote should take place immediately. If the rinos want to vote no, then, let them take their chances with their constituents.

31 posted on 09/24/2018 5:36:45 AM PDT by Know et al ( Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The GOP needs to set the vote for Thursday after Ford testifies, PERIOD. Grassley needs to stop letting Hillary lawyers run his committee.


32 posted on 09/24/2018 6:28:47 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

“The years have not been kind.“

The GENES have not been kind.


33 posted on 09/24/2018 6:31:35 AM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

Christine’s loving family should have spent some of their wealth on their daughters braces.


34 posted on 09/24/2018 6:36:51 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Do your part: email McConnell, Grassley, Flake, Collins and Murkowski now and tell them to stop this while they can still restore the dignity of the Senate and the rule of law. I also emailed Dianne Feinstein and told her to stop this assassination while she still has a chance of salvaging her own reputation.


35 posted on 09/24/2018 6:42:52 AM PDT by Wife of D28Man (America is free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The good Colonel hits another one out of the park.


36 posted on 09/24/2018 6:58:51 AM PDT by wjcsux (The hyperventilating of the left means we are winning! (Tagline courtesy of Laz.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Know et al

The object is to tip Collin’s vote...She was pretty solid for Kavanaugh before Ford came around.


37 posted on 09/24/2018 8:10:24 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
It wasn't solid but Flake was a yes too. It may have been weak but he was a yes.

I don't know how either one could vote no, now with the accusations being blown out of the water but after all they are rinos.

38 posted on 09/24/2018 8:19:28 AM PDT by Know et al ( Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Know et al

I believe Flake is in also.


39 posted on 09/24/2018 8:39:10 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
What's most noticeable to me??

That her brothers, both lawyers, aren't backing her up or even supporting her.

The one person you tell all to at that age is your brother...he's your protector.

I remember going to my brother when I got hit on by a lesbian at the "Y". I was probably 12.

Are her parents alive? We're hearing nothing and there's really no bio telling us a lot about them.

40 posted on 09/24/2018 8:44:42 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson