Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Your Vote Hasn’t Mattered Since 1913
The daily bell ^ | 6OCT18 | By Joe Jarvis

Posted on 10/07/2018 7:29:48 PM PDT by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: vannrox
The Federal Reserve system was implemented, cementing centralized federal control over the banking and monetary system…

The Federal Reserve isn't Federal, and it has no reserve. It's an arm of the global banking cartel, and if Trump has his way I suspect it's about to be nationalized, disempowered and eventually dissolved.

41 posted on 10/08/2018 3:43:42 AM PDT by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

I think it is designed to demoralize Conservatives as they fire up while the dems are actually demoralized....


42 posted on 10/08/2018 4:19:27 AM PDT by trebb (So many "experts" with so little experience in what they preach....even here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus

If you are referencing Mitch McConnell, to this observer he’s been doing a G*d damn FANTASTIC JOB on judges and deserves an office building named after him or something.


43 posted on 10/08/2018 4:54:36 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus
@Impy: Excellent tag line!

It is, isn't it? ;p

44 posted on 10/08/2018 4:55:47 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Impy; NFHale; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; LS

17th Amendment mouthbreathing again?

Why bother replying to it? It’s like arguing with the same 75 IQ lifeform that the Earth isn’t flat. It’s pointless.

And Happy COLUMBUS Day!

It’s not (((Indigenous Peoples’ Day))) or any other PC-speak garbage.


45 posted on 10/08/2018 5:21:58 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Impy

I think they are over thinking this.
Application of the Tenth Amendment and a Convention of the States is what we need.


46 posted on 10/08/2018 6:04:14 AM PDT by ZULU (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Impy

He can really move those deck chairs.


47 posted on 10/08/2018 6:04:58 AM PDT by Theophilus (Repent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Impy
The reason I love it, is because it cleverly, humorously and self depreciatively articulates the central tenet of conservativism: total depravity.
48 posted on 10/08/2018 6:08:15 AM PDT by Theophilus (Repent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

You could make an excellent case for Woodrow Wilson being the worst President in American history, James Buchanan and Barack Obama notwithstanding.


49 posted on 10/08/2018 6:10:34 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Voters have little interest in choosing judges. A small minority of voters could easily elect radical judges and completely shred the Constitution.


50 posted on 10/08/2018 8:14:27 AM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Thanks - It will be great when more people see that those early deviations from the original intent of the Constitution are what set us up to become an oligarchy instead of a Constitutional Republic.


51 posted on 10/08/2018 8:46:18 AM PDT by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

I would side with the repeal of the 17th Amendment simply on the grounds that it was created by the Founders to check the power f the Federal government. We desperately need that check. Some background on how well it worked in the past would be helpful.


52 posted on 10/08/2018 10:27:34 AM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog; Impy; NFHale; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; LS
>> You could make an excellent case for Woodrow Wilson being the worst President in American history <<

I'd love that case to be made to the conservatives who keep yapping about how "today's Democrats" have "changed" and that the Democrats "used to be honorable and patriotic" prior to the late 1960s. "This ain't your father's Democratic Party" "I remember the Democrats had pro-America leaders like JFK and Scoop Jackson" Blah blah blah.

If that's the case, why was Wilson so horrible? Shouldn't have he been one of those honorable, patriotic, pro-America first Democrats? If the RAT party was "the conservative party back then" and "the two parties switched sides in the 60s and 70s", should all those "conservative" Democrats thrown him out of their "patriotic" party if he dared promote globalism and marxism?

53 posted on 10/08/2018 11:42:27 AM PDT by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Wilson was by far the most racist President we ever had.


54 posted on 10/08/2018 11:45:19 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; Impy; fieldmarshaldj
Again, make that case on the "JFK is God" threads where they routinely claim the DemonRat Party was "honorable and patriotic and conservative" prior to the late 60s, then they "changed" somehow.

I agree with you that Wilson was scum. Also, the RAT party overall was HEAVILY socialist and globalist in 1913. But historical facts like that get in the way of their delusional narrative.

Either Wilson and his fellow RATs were socialists and the RAT party has been pushing this stuff for well over a century and HASN'T "changed" OR The RAT Party was overall honorable and patriotic and conservative before JFK was killed, which means that 50 years earlier in 1913 they certainly would have been a bunch of great patriotic leaders and "more conservative than today's Republicans"

You guys can't have it both ways.

55 posted on 10/08/2018 11:59:52 AM PDT by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

I may have disagreed with him on things, but the only Rat I had some respect for is Harry Truman.


56 posted on 10/08/2018 12:03:23 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; campaignPete R-CT; LS; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; DoughtyOne; ...

As I’ve pointed out many times, the Democrat Party was hijacked by the Socialists in 1896 when they deposed Grover Cleveland’s sensible Bourbons. They still had some center-right people in it, but once the left got hold, it was set in stone for the future. After Cleveland in 1892, only on two occasions after that did the Democrats nominate two non-leftists for President: Judge Alton B. Parker in 1904 who was a moderate, and former Ambassador to the Court of St. James & ex-Solicitor General John W. Davis in 1924 (who, despite serving under Wilson was a center-right figure and declined an offer from President Harding to serve on the Supreme Court - not for any noble reasons, he actually couldn’t afford the pay cut. He was making several hundreds of thousands in the private sector and $15k was too little for him to consider).

The left was so enraged in 1924 that they didn’t get to nominate their man (either NY Gov. Al Smith or Wilson’s son-in-law, William Gibbs McAdoo) that they went with Socialist WI Sen. (and ultimate RINO) Robert La Follette, Sr., which handily delivered the WH to Coolidge.

So, from 1928 to date, every Dem Presidential candidate has been of the left without fail.

It’s truly a shame we couldn’t have had two parties in the country representing the right-of-center: a Bourbon Democrat Party and the GOP with the Socialist-Communist left abolished or consigned to the dustbin of history. Imagine spirited, patriotic battles as to which could implement a Constitutional Conservative agenda more aggressively. How much further along and better off would this country be today with two such choices competing for our votes ?


57 posted on 10/08/2018 12:28:35 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

He did one good thing with dropping the big ones on Japan, but his failure to tackle the epic-level Soviet and Soviet sympathizer infestation of the federal government (for starters) and not allowing MacArthur to take out Mao in favor of Chiang kicked off all the problems that would plague us in foreign policy to this day. Disastrous incompetence.


58 posted on 10/08/2018 12:42:32 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Also, if you really cared about issues it was much easier to try to influence people’s votes more locally around you than vast amounts of people’s vote spread out much further away from you.


59 posted on 10/08/2018 5:09:56 PM PDT by Bellflower (Who dares believe Jesus? He says absolutely amazing things, which few dare conside. r.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus; Impy

“He can really move those deck chairs.”
_________________

If by “moving those deck chairs” you mean blocking Merrick Garland from even getting a hearing during the close to one year that he was a SCOTUS nominee, blocking dozens of other Obama nominees to Circuit and District Courts, keeping the Senate in session to prevent Obama from making recess appointments to SCOTUS and lower courts, and shepherding the confirmation of record numbers of judicial nominees during President Trump’s first two years in office, including two SCOTUS nominees, then I wish that every Senate Majority Leader “moved those deck chairs” like Mitch McConnell has done over the past four years. He has been the most effective and consequential Republican Senate Majority Leader since the position was created in the 1920s.


60 posted on 10/08/2018 7:22:00 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson