Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laura J. Richardson is first woman to lead the largest command in the US Army
CNN ^ | 16 October 2018 | Andrea Diaz

Posted on 10/17/2018 2:34:50 AM PDT by zeestephen

For the first time in US Army Forces Command, or FORSCOM, history, a woman will be leading the largest command in the Army, representing 776,000 soldiers and 96,000 civilians.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2018 2:34:50 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Laura was a fine officer when I served with her in the 101st, I have not heard anything to change my opinion. I was kind of surprised they did not make her the 1st woman Division Commander.

Good luck to her.


2 posted on 10/17/2018 2:47:23 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I’m glad to hear she’s good. I will be relieved when (if?) we finally start hearing “best person” instead of all the “first woman” or “first woman of color” nonsense.


3 posted on 10/17/2018 2:52:22 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Four stars and FORSCOM are a pretty decent consolation prize.


4 posted on 10/17/2018 2:56:30 AM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Glad in her job she’d never had to carry a wounded soldier out of harms way. She would not qualify for that.


5 posted on 10/17/2018 3:06:11 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Pin drop time! Big-name lib swampers go into hiding!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Which is not good in principal, and leads the way for another unbiblical goal of diversity, that of the first transgender general.


6 posted on 10/17/2018 3:07:42 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

“Glad in her job she’d never had to carry a wounded soldier out of harms way. She would not qualify for that.”

Yeh, there’s no question that women a quite willing and able to pull the trigger. History has plenty of proof concerning that. The concern about women in the combat arms is their body strength, lack of. The other is; they’re women, in an environment made up primarily of under 25 yr old males, healthy, chock full of testosterone and piss and vinegar. Thus, the opportunity for male/female morale and relationship issues is off the charts.


7 posted on 10/17/2018 3:19:24 AM PDT by snoringbear (W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

I’m sick of the “glass ceiling” bs


8 posted on 10/17/2018 3:39:23 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Women need to stick to things they are good at. Military leadership is not one of them.


9 posted on 10/17/2018 3:41:46 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

I do not find it bothersome to see a woman in a high ranking military position.

What I find bothersome is this being on CNN, which to me automatically creates suspicion. At first I thought this would be one of those tranny things. But she appears to be genuine female.


10 posted on 10/17/2018 3:46:01 AM PDT by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

I think they’ll develop strength enhancing exoskeletons for soldiers before you deal with those relational issues you also raise.


11 posted on 10/17/2018 3:55:22 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

What could go wrong?


12 posted on 10/17/2018 3:57:47 AM PDT by semaj (U\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect

Drove past the HQ yesterday


13 posted on 10/17/2018 4:14:57 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anton

Joan of Arc was pretty good.


14 posted on 10/17/2018 4:22:10 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear
Read the war college study and Israeli studies on the 1973 war in the Syrian sector of the Golan area. Different women would not, could not turn off the emotion and executed enemy soldiers multiple times in multiple locations after they surrendered or were wounded; of course those very women left their daughters and the grandmothers too old to fight with knives and orders to kill all the children and themselves if the front line did not hold - emotion, according to law is not admissible for war crimes - not judging but actually going to Israel and walking over those battlefields and local tour guides explaining their feelings during that war period at least made it clear to me that women once emotionally engaged do not turn off once the bullets stop flying. Also, men exposed themselves to protect those women and were killed or wounded in situations where they would not have come to aid or protect a fellow male soldier.

So make women infantry units, male infantry units and do not mix. Use the female infantry to guard prisoners at the front suspected of war crimes - no trial necesary.

15 posted on 10/17/2018 4:23:32 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

She was burned at the stake at age 19 so I’m not sure how good she actually was. Sort of like the Titanic’s 21 year old DeCaprio being the then best actor in the World.


16 posted on 10/17/2018 4:25:40 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: anton

well there is that


17 posted on 10/17/2018 4:26:24 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Ridiculous!!


18 posted on 10/17/2018 4:55:06 AM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

I have no information to suggest that the General is not a very competent military administrator. What I don’t see in her service record is a lot of actual combat experience. I believe she was in theatre a couple of times, but from the sketchy details I’ve seen its impossible to know if she was ever in harms way. It would be very informative if others who know more about her career could fill in some of the gaps. Is she the real deal or another Armchair General? There are male Generals who have had limited combat experience, so it wouldn’t be unprecedented, but is the promotion she just received usually reserved for someone with significant combat experience? Thanks.


19 posted on 10/17/2018 5:18:40 AM PDT by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: anton

Totally agree.
Look at Boadiccea.


20 posted on 10/17/2018 5:19:10 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson