Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zeestephen

Glad in her job she’d never had to carry a wounded soldier out of harms way. She would not qualify for that.


5 posted on 10/17/2018 3:06:11 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Pin drop time! Big-name lib swampers go into hiding!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CincyRichieRich

“Glad in her job she’d never had to carry a wounded soldier out of harms way. She would not qualify for that.”

Yeh, there’s no question that women a quite willing and able to pull the trigger. History has plenty of proof concerning that. The concern about women in the combat arms is their body strength, lack of. The other is; they’re women, in an environment made up primarily of under 25 yr old males, healthy, chock full of testosterone and piss and vinegar. Thus, the opportunity for male/female morale and relationship issues is off the charts.


7 posted on 10/17/2018 3:19:24 AM PDT by snoringbear (W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
Glad in her job she’d never had to carry a wounded soldier out of harms way. She would not qualify for that.

But her administrative skills free up a male officer to lead men into battle.

24 posted on 10/17/2018 9:24:15 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson