Posted on 10/21/2018 5:56:21 AM PDT by kevcol
It’s pregnant. God help that child.
I’d have self-aborted if my mom was a Hutt.
She’s morphed into an unfunny Cabbage Patch Kid.
I had forgot that she got caught stealing jokes.
Her whole routine is a rip-off.
Get this, the bitch announced the pregnancy at the bottom of a list of her endorsements for Communists on Election Day. Shows what’s a priority in her life.
More gold from The Chateau:
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2018/10/23/science-the-npc-leftoid-hivemind-is-real/
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2018/10/23/revolutionary-spirals-to-civil-war-2/
Hivemind: It’s true. You see more “diverse” opinions on FR from Conservatives than you do from the left. It doesn’t even matter who you speak to, they all sound exactly alike. There’s no reasoning with them.
Look at the Democrat voting record in Congress, virtually the entire membership exists within a frame of 0%-10% or less on the right-left voting scale. In the 1980s, you still had some that reached 50% on the scale and hence “got it” at least half the time. That’s all gone now. It was the radicalization of the Watergate Baby class that forced the center-right leftward, otherwise individual members would lose influence or office.
As I’ve said before, too, when you have two such diametrically opposed values systems, they simply cannot function within one nation. The left side will have to be completely destroyed, just as the left knows they will have to destroy the right, as the early leaders of the Soviet Union had to do in order to wipe away the opposition to their revolution. And this leftist “revolution” comes straight from Satan himself and his bitter hatred and jealousy for God.
Americans don’t like ugliness, but it is now staring them right in the face, and they’re going to have to choose a side. Best to deal with it now than gutlessly try to put it off for a future generation.
“Americans don’t like ugliness, but it is now staring them right in the face, and they’re going to have to choose a side. Best to deal with it now than gutlessly try to put it off for a future generation.”
Like I’ve said countless times, I saw the break back during Election 2000.
If it wasn’t for sports and the amount of dope (prescribed and otherwise) that people were on, there would already have been blood in the streets years ago.
It’s coming now, not in a generation or two.
I saw it earlier, in 1992. Bush, Sr. blew 12 years of putting this nation back on the right moral course. I had a sickening feeling to the pit of my soul that it was going to lead to horrible things, and it did. I cast my first legal vote at 18 in that election for Bush, Sr., since I knew that Pea-Rot was a demagogue and Bubba was dangerously corrupt (as was his rotten evil bitch wife, partner-in-crime). Still, it was Pat Buchanan who was straight-forwardly honest in the primary about our culture wars, which was (of course) savagely attacked, as are all people who dare speak the truth.
It was Reagan’s gravest error in judgment failing to select a running mate who could carry on his agenda, someone truly believing in it, for the next 8 years. The Bush family never believed in his agenda, they merely rode it to power.
Reagan, his advisors and his family all thought he needed Bush. No one at that moment believed he could crush Jimmy Carter that way, not even Reagan.
Dreadful mistake. It’s unfortunate he didn’t learn from his earlier mistake in 1976 in picking Sen. Dick Schweiker, the liberal from PA. That alone inflicted enough damage to prevent his upending Ford. As I’ve said countless times, he could’ve picked people like Laxalt, OH Gov. Rhodes or Congressman Ashbrook. If he wanted a Texan, he should’ve picked Gov. Connally.
I never understood this obsession with wanting Bush on the ticket. I mean, he was a two-time electoral loser in Texas and was about the ultimate “Deep Stater” as CIA Director. He should’ve been nothing more than a lesser cabinet official under Reagan (if that), or resuming a diplomatic posting to Asia. VP or President ? No way. Absent the brilliant Lee Atwater, Dukakis might’ve prevailed in 1988.
I think Reagan believed the RINOs attempt to put Ford on the ticket was indicative of a serious resistance by them to his campaign.
You have to remember Reagan was viewed as this “radical” and Bush “softened him” some in the eyes of many people.
I think it was sound. He was THE most loyal member of the administration, ALWAYS took Reagan’s side.
You’ll see this in my new bio, due out next Father’s Day, “Reagan: The American President.”
Shameless plug, eh ? :-P
I remember even in 1988 (at 14), I didn’t trust Bush. I supported Dole with the belief he wouldn’t let the Democrat leadership in Congress screw with him. Bush couldn’t handle them at all. Spkrs. Wright & Tom Foley, Sen. Majority Leader George Mitchell and my execrable Sen. Jim Sasser ate his lunch. I don’t think anyone has before or since blown such a mega-high approval rating only to lose in under 2 years as Bush, Sr. did.
Add in that it became abundantly clear he didn’t even really want to win reelection in ‘92. I wouldn’t term him a ringer for Bubba (as McQueeg and Willard so obviously were for Zero), but he was clearly entirely to blame for the rise of the Clintoons. But then I go back to Reagan for picking someone who shouldn’t have been picked.
Well despite his rather weak pedigree, Bush was the runner up, that’s why he was on the ticket, no mystery.
Of course I agree with you, horrible choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.