Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Pelosi: ‘Democrats Will Carry the House’
brietbart ^ | 10/30/2018 | Ian Hanchett

Posted on 10/31/2018 6:07:51 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

On Tuesday’s broadcast of CBS’ “Late Show,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) predicted that Democrats will win the majority in the House of Representatives, and if they “have a bigger victory,” they will win the majority in the Senate.

Pelosi said, “Well, let me say this, up until today, I would have said, if the election were held today, we would win. What now I’m saying is, we will win.”

She added, “Democrats will carry the House. If we have a bigger victory, the Senate, governorships. It’s going to be a great night for America.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2018midterms; bluewave; botox; california; clintonnonnews; cnn; democrats; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; house; mediawingofthednc; midterms; nancypelosi; nonplayercharacter; nonplayercharacters; npc; npcs; partisanmediashills; pelosi; presstitutes; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; smearmachine; speakerpelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Ancient Man

Exactly.


41 posted on 10/31/2018 6:32:15 AM PDT by momincombatboots (How many vetoed spending dollars with chuck n Nancy without wall funding?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Let's focus on positive results next Tuesday. If everybody gets out and votes, the results will be as happy for us as they were in 2016.

WHAT HE SAID!

42 posted on 10/31/2018 6:32:24 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP! WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

EDIT:

Tire old white women, and career politician,Nan couldn’t carry a emptyr styrofoam cups.


43 posted on 10/31/2018 6:32:53 AM PDT by Leep (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

Once more in English?


44 posted on 10/31/2018 6:34:22 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
It’s going to be a great night for America.

It's never a great night for Americans when democrats win. Any democrat that wins an election is one step in the wrong direction. When Obama won, that was one leap backwards for mankind and one giant step in the wrong direction for America.
45 posted on 10/31/2018 6:34:56 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

They’re raising the expectations for their soon-to-be-very-”disappointed” base, so they’ll “party” even harder on 11/7 than after last election.

The pwned metro police will stand down again.


46 posted on 10/31/2018 6:36:41 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I think she’s been watching too much joy behar


47 posted on 10/31/2018 6:38:48 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

from Nancy’s lips to Satan’s ears.


48 posted on 10/31/2018 6:42:44 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
WATCH FOR VOTER FRAUD
49 posted on 10/31/2018 6:45:15 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Didn’t a house fall on that wicked witch?


50 posted on 10/31/2018 6:46:01 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

They might be right.

The case which brought about the birth passport was one in which the parents (southern Chinese I believe) owned a house in America and were planning to live here permanently.

I think. Just read that earlier today.

There are plenty who believe that was part of what was considered by the court at the time the case was decided...

https://www.google.com.vn/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna926501


51 posted on 10/31/2018 6:48:20 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27; All

I would really like Trump to visit AZ and NV one final time to help. He is only visiting the Midwest and South basically.


52 posted on 10/31/2018 6:50:30 AM PDT by ronbivtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

In Handel’s case, I am somewhat sympathetic since she had a bruising special election and then had to go right to the midterms.

I think she wins. Kemp, I don’t know.


53 posted on 10/31/2018 6:52:36 AM PDT by ronbivtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
It’s going to be a great night for America.
She's right about that. The only improvements I can think of is if Pelosi is not reelected, and Hitlery drops dead of her ailments before she reaches the polls..

54 posted on 10/31/2018 6:56:42 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (and btw -- https://www.gofundme.com/for-rotator-cuff-repair-surgery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vette6387
"I am just wondering what RATs like Pelosi are going to do when they loose another general election?"

Leftism always fails - economically, morally & culturally. ALWAYS.

They only have one tool remaining - a violent overthrow of our Constitutional Republic.

Their violence & terrorism will ramp up even more - "Blood in the streets" is their battle cry.

55 posted on 10/31/2018 6:57:25 AM PDT by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" @HOROWITZ39, DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ancient Man

It will be destroyed by force in the time being.


56 posted on 10/31/2018 7:03:17 AM PDT by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of today be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ronbivtx

If Abrams beat Kemp, it will be disaster for Georgia and she will be one of the dems’ new darlings.


57 posted on 10/31/2018 7:04:13 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ('DEPLORABLE' Charter Member of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - and DAMN Proud of it!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Rep. Nancy Pelosi: ‘I guarantee it,’ Trump won't be president

Take it to the bank. lol

58 posted on 10/31/2018 7:05:37 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123
Bull!

NBC News, now there's an unbiased source /s

According to The Fourteenth Debate Website:

The jurisdiction requirement was added to the original draft of the Fourteenth Amendment by the Senate after a lengthy and acrimonious debate. In fact, Senator Jacob Merritt Howard of Michigan proposed the addition of the phrase specifically because he wanted to make clear that the simple accident of birth in the United States was not sufficient to justify citizenship. Sen. Howard noted that the jurisdiction requirement is "simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already." Sen. Howard said that "this will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons."

Sen. Reverdy Johnson of Maryland, who was the only Democrat to participate in the Senate debate, was even more explicit about the meaning of the jurisdiction requirement: “[A]ll persons born in the United States and not subject to some foreign Power -- for that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who have brought the matter before -- shall be considered as citizens of the United States.” Sen. Johnson's reading of the jurisdiction requirement also is consistent with our naturalization requirements. Since at least 1795, federal laws governing naturalization have required aliens to renounce all allegiance to any foreign power and to support the U.S. Constitution. Such allegiance was never assumed simply because the alien was residing in the United States; instead an affirmative oath was required.

Sen. Lyman Trumbull of Illinois, one of the principle authors of the 14th Amendment, said that "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" meant subject to its "complete" jurisdiction, meaning "not owing allegiance to anybody else."

In 1884 the Supreme Court held that children born to Indian parents were not born "subject to" U.S. jurisdiction because, among other reasons, the person so born could not change his status by his "own will without the action or assent of the United States." And "no one can become a citizen of a nation without its consent."

Believe the words of the guys who wrote the amendment or NBC News and some minor federal judge, hmmmm... quite a condundrum....

59 posted on 10/31/2018 7:05:42 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Vote GOP this November. Take two friends to vote with you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

She thinks they have the voter fraud levels nailed down this time.


60 posted on 10/31/2018 7:07:09 AM PDT by JustaCowgirl (You can pick your causes, but not the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson