Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Norwegian warship at risk of sinking after collision with oil tanker
CNBC ^ | 11/8/2018

Posted on 11/08/2018 6:43:24 AM PST by Gamecock

A Norwegian warship was heavily damaged in a collision with a Maltese oil tanker in the North Sea off the coast of Norway.

According to Norwegian media reports Thursday, the frigate is in danger of sinking after sustaining heavy damage. The oil tanker is reportedly undamaged.

Several reports confirmed that all 137 crew on the navy ship were evacuated but seven have been treated for minor injuries.

"The armed forces is now reviewing all the means available in the region to assist the KNM Helge Ingstad (the damaged warship)," Lieutenant Colonel Ivar Moen told AFP.

According to the website Marine Traffic, the 62,000-ton oil tanker Sola is continuing its route from Norway to a terminal in northeast England.

However, one separate media report said that despite suffering only superficial damage, the tanker is now at a standstill and waiting to be towed back into a Norwegian port.

Reuters reported that the Equinor Sture oil shipment terminal, from where the oil tanker left, has been closed as a precautionary measure.


TOPICS: Extended News; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: collision; maritime; naval; navy; norway; ships; shipwreck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Gamecock
Don't worry about the cost of repairing the frigate. Kanaduh will buy it 'as is, where is' for a 10% discount from its original cost! After all, Turd-owe and the Lieberals are ALWAYS looking for a good bargain! After all, we've recently received approval from the US government to buy Australia's USED F-18s, rather than NEW Super Hornets.

Let's not forget that the LIEBERALS under Jean Crouton in 1998, purchased four used submarines from the British, the four Upholder-class, er, White Elephant-class submarines, the ones with the screen doors on the bottom. They worked out so VERY well! What could go wrong with the RCN of purchasing the KNM Helge Ingstad?

</sarc>

41 posted on 11/08/2018 8:01:35 AM PST by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
I miss Johnny.


42 posted on 11/08/2018 8:02:57 AM PST by null and void (Leftards don't know what 12000 illegal aliens marching thru Mexico know - America's a Great country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Might have something to do with 62,000 tons vs 5290 tons ...


43 posted on 11/08/2018 8:05:03 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

“Is this a new type of warfare?”

This is exactly what I’m thinking. The idea these ships collided by accident is VERY questionable.


44 posted on 11/08/2018 8:11:12 AM PST by Personal Responsibility (If we disarmed democrats gun violence would decrease by 90%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
Well, OK, I'll concede the possibility that the mass difference MIGHT have had something to do with it.

😁

45 posted on 11/08/2018 8:15:14 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

To be fair, collisions can happen easily unless both ships have alert bridge crews. My ship came closer than I like to remember to an oil tanker that was running very fast, in heavy fog, with no lights. A submarine’s sonar might not hear the engines with all that oil in between, and warships often run under EMCON - without using radio/radar. That’s why we have lookouts and trained professionals.


46 posted on 11/08/2018 8:30:37 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; sukhoi-30mki

47 posted on 11/08/2018 8:38:32 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

Sad story. Queen Mary was under orders to stop for nothing.

The warship went down with all hands.


48 posted on 11/08/2018 8:40:04 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; SaveFerris; PROCON

Just don’t use the ones with the hole in the middle.


49 posted on 11/08/2018 9:14:37 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; SaveFerris; FredZarguna; PROCON; Army Air Corps; KC_Lion; Yaelle
And that, my friends, is why I decided to be a "land guy."


50 posted on 11/08/2018 9:17:40 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Slowly at first. Then, all at once.


51 posted on 11/08/2018 9:26:08 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

“Again with a warship that seems incapable of avoiding a slow moving tanker the size of a football field. What is going on.”

Hanky-panky on the bridge?


52 posted on 11/08/2018 9:31:58 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

Caused by a zig that should have been a zag.


53 posted on 11/08/2018 9:33:10 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

I don’t get it.

An oil tanker is basically a bag full of oil, the metal skin could be made very thin and would still work.

A warship is supposed (in my mind) to be able to ram smaller (or bigger) ships and keep going.

How come these supposed warships (including our two destroyers (?) that crashed in the china sea) are so FRAGILE?

It gives me very little confidence on their capabilities during a real war.

It makes me think of the movie Battleship where they ended up using a museum battleship to battle aliens, after all other ships had been destroyed, since it was the only one beefy enough to take the hits.


54 posted on 11/08/2018 9:48:42 AM PST by Toughluck_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Well now you've done it.

Obligatory whale explosion vid.

55 posted on 11/08/2018 10:13:53 AM PST by Gamecock (In church today, we so often find we meet only the same old world, not Christ and His Kingdom. AS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Hmmm... Chinese motherboard or female navigator?


56 posted on 11/08/2018 10:14:39 AM PST by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
It's a steel ship.

The thing looks to be grounded on rocks. I suspect it was pushed onto the rocks by the tanker and crushed between them, and that caused the damage. The coastal waters around Norway are perilous.

57 posted on 11/08/2018 11:09:19 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Toughluck_freeper
A warship is supposed (in my mind) to be able to ram smaller (or bigger) ships and keep going.

In ancient roman times, ships fought by ramming each other and then troops would board and kill. Today, ships fight by throwing projectiles and aircraft at distant targets. Armoring them for such a thing would add large amounts of weight to them, which would require a lot more fuel and make them far less maneuverable. They simply aren't meant to collide with anything ever.

58 posted on 11/08/2018 11:13:00 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Alternate view, you can see the gash on the starboard side:


59 posted on 11/08/2018 2:41:17 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Pining for the Fjords it looks like.


60 posted on 11/08/2018 2:43:31 PM PST by Professional Engineer (Looks like I'll have to buy the White Album again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson