Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Ruled Against Trump On Canceling DACA Protections

Wall Street Journal ^ | Nov 8, 2018 | Brent Kendall

[marktwain]

Watch Roberts torpedo Trump in the SC.

It certainly is worth watching.

I am curious.

What will your response be if it does not happen?

[marktwain]

Trump needs to judge shop before issuing these.

He cannot. They are for the entire nation.

The left then judge shops to find one district judge who will claim it is unconstitutional.

Then the whole nation has to put up with that single judge's ruling.

Thomas has railed against this, and said the Supreme Court should rein in the District Courts, limiting their rulings to only their districts.

[marktwain]

But it was an honest decision based on his philosophy of judicial restraint.

Interesting that you state this.

How do you explain the reports that he wrote one decision, which he shared with other justices; Then, at the last minute,he wrote the effective decision, which was opposite?

That does not sound like an honest decision.

Perhaps my memory is faulty, but that is what I recall.

[MeganC]

Why in hell does a district court get away with issuing a NATIONAL order?

[puppypusher]

The Ninth Circuit court needs to be busted up or placed under a judicial supervisory status. No court has been as overturned as much as that court has.

Now that could be attributed to stupidity or failure to cite the laws in an unbiased manner. That court is Biased in the extreme.

[oil_dude]

“Roberts made a legal decision. You can argue with it. Not everyone agreed with it. But it was an honest decision based on his philosophy of judicial restraint. It wasn’t really a surprise. And no, he didn’t make anything up to do it.

That one decision doesn’t mean that now Roberts is a leftist. He’s made many other decisions, and been part of many 5-4 decisions. This fixation on his Obamacare opinion is silly. “

You are wrong. Roberts REWROTE the legislation making the penalty a “tax”. This is a textbook example of “legislating from the bench”, the very thing we conservatives abhor the most.

[bgill]

limiting their rulings to only their districts.

As it should be.

[Iscool]

The ruling, by a three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said the administration voiced inadequate and flawed reasons for its decision in September 2017 to terminate an Obama-era program called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA.

Would seem 'reasons' are not required to create an Executive Order...I'd surely like to see Trump send them a letter letting them know they have no jurisdiction in this matter and they will be ignored...

[qaz123]

Still, she’s an ACLU Secular Progressive Jew, so she may well hang on just for spite.

I think that’s it, right there.

[rxh4n1]

The amazing part is a Federal Court ordering the President to violate the Constitution.