Skip to comments.
Mother of Thousand Oaks Shooting Victim: ‘I Want Gun Control’
https://www.thedailybeast.com ^
| 08 November 2018
| unknown
Posted on 11/08/2018 4:44:49 PM PST by BackRoads775
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: BackRoads775
We need thug control, not gun control.
To: BackRoads775
She lives in California, so she has gun control. I want freedom, risks and all.
3
posted on
11/08/2018 4:46:10 PM PST
by
Trod Upon
(Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
To: BackRoads775
I want looney control. Lock the crazed up.
4
posted on
11/08/2018 4:46:28 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: BackRoads775
Kalifornia already has “gun control”.
5
posted on
11/08/2018 4:46:40 PM PST
by
Godebert
To: BackRoads775
It’s already illegal to shoot people.
To: Blue House Sue
She’ll be at the SOTU, guest of Kamala Harris.
7
posted on
11/08/2018 4:48:07 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: BackRoads775
Lady, you HAVE gun control. What you do not have is heart control.
8
posted on
11/08/2018 4:48:24 PM PST
by
madison10
To: BackRoads775
Benjamin Franklin once said: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
9
posted on
11/08/2018 4:48:28 PM PST
by
Bitman
To: BackRoads775
10
posted on
11/08/2018 4:48:57 PM PST
by
papertyger
(Trump, A president so great, that Democrats who said they would leave America if he won, stayed!)
To: Blue House Sue
We need thug control, not gun control.I don't think we're going to see gun control but what we will eventually see will be the ability to flag an increasingly larger number of people from being able to legally possess guns. This will be only marginally effective, if at all, but it will make people feel better.
A lot of people aren't going to like it but Americans are getting tired of seeing innocent people murdered by lunatics they've never met with an axe to grind
11
posted on
11/08/2018 4:49:34 PM PST
by
Drew68
(Twitter @TheRealDrew68 https://twitter.com/TheRealDrew68)
To: BackRoads775
Already have it, plus gun free zone and people left protected. How about arming citizens to protect themselves. 200 people, including police officers, and no one with a gun. Incredible.
12
posted on
11/08/2018 4:50:16 PM PST
by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
To: BackRoads775
FU lady.
You live in a state with some of the toughest gun las I the nation. Where this guy used a PISTOL to shoot everybody up that he still had after being investigated by your states mental health experts.
And whats the first thing you do? Cry for your child? No - you immediately politicize the event.
FU lady.
13
posted on
11/08/2018 4:50:52 PM PST
by
Skywise
To: BackRoads775
This poor woman.
I can’t imagine losing a son.
She must be out of her mind with grief right now.
14
posted on
11/08/2018 4:51:02 PM PST
by
pax_et_bonum
(Never Forget the SEALs of Extortion 17 - and God Bless The USA and President Trump.)
To: Drew68
“I don't think we're going to see gun control but what we will eventually see will be the ability to flag an increasingly larger number of people from being able to legally possess guns. This will be only marginally effective, if at all, but it will make people feel better.”
That would mean profiling of those who meet the characteristics of past mass shooters.
To: Drew68
I don't think we're going to see gun control but what we will eventually see will be the ability to flag an increasingly larger number of people from being able to legally possess guns. This will be only marginally effective, if at all, but it will make people feel better. At the same time that we "flag an increasingly larger number of people from being able to legally possess guns," we'll also be able to "flag an increasingly smaller number of people from being able to legally vote."
16
posted on
11/08/2018 4:52:41 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: BackRoads775
We have gun control.
Lots of it.
More laws for criminals to ignore are not going to change anything.
17
posted on
11/08/2018 4:53:31 PM PST
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
To: BackRoads775
Civics 101 lady. So you don’t want folks feeling bad about your defenseless child being killed by someone who, despite ANY laws you may pass could still have taken their lives? Take out the guys at the door, chain doors, gas cans to light it up and who,would we blame? Match company? Gas container company? Chain company? Lock company? Big oil?
18
posted on
11/08/2018 4:53:40 PM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Trod Upon
What she meant was she wants Guns banned.
19
posted on
11/08/2018 4:53:59 PM PST
by
Autonomous User
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: BackRoads775
Murder is against the law
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson