From joannenova.com.au
Posted on 11/18/2018 9:54:28 AM PST by ETL
Sure - but you are as late to the party as the article you posted.
The alarmist data is always corrected well after the BS is spread like gospel and the truth is whispered. Meanwhile that idiot Romney is preparing to clog the Senate with climate crap. Thanks Utah.
“Carbon pollution” is the most ridiculous term liberals have invented to date. Carbon is the basis for all life, and we wouldn’t even be here without it. Are they taking the side of Agent Smith in The Matrix movie when he calls all humans a virus, only in this case it’s all life? And what is life polluting? Climate? What good is climate without life?
Sounds more convincing than “protactinium pollution”.
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
Low-info voters didn’t`t even notice the switch from CO2 to C.
They mindlessly repeat what they’re told to think.
More fake science is being revealed by the internet. That was not an accident.
Wow, couldn’t have seen that coming...
Someone please tell this to Holly-Wood’s own Robert DI-BOZO!
Yeah, you get CO2 by burning carbon, so not quite the same thing. Like saying it rains hydrogen.
Where was this published? Sounds like among many issues that this was not properly peer reviewed. It suggests the possibility that publishers and peers overlooked problems in a rush to publish results they like.
Lack of the Scientific Process is the biggest flaw in the whole global warming debate. But that shouldn’t be an excuse to ignore the rigor of analysis. It is simply impossible to obtain a double-blind control group. The entire theory rests on post hoc analysis.
Separately, anyone who says “it is settled science” is not a scientist. In science nothing is ever settled; in fact it is an important principle to challenge science at every turn - that is what science is.
From joannenova.com.au
Major science paper debunked by hobbyist.
Error? ERROR? There are no errors in baseball!
Waitaminute...
Obviously, the reviewers did an inadequate job of proofing the paper before it was published.
That’s what happens when you have your ideological buddies do the peer review...:^)
What's "FP"?
Typo, I fat finger when I type fast.
I think the most I can ever get in action is four and the outer two are stiff.
The OH is over the Antarctic; and, sure enough, there is very little life there.
And almost ZERO humans.
And the ones that ARE there wear enough clothing to protect them from...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.