Posted on 12/06/2018 12:23:20 PM PST by Kaslin
My question for Congressjerk Eric Swalwell is pretty simple: “How many Americans would you murder to achieve your goal of disarming us?”
It’s a fair question.
Swalwell is the MSNBC stalwart who recently wrote an op-ed advocating that the government confiscate the guns that make people like him wet themselves and imprison those of us who decline to surrender them. Millions of Americans own these basic tools of freedom, which the ignorant call “assault weapons,” and these loyal citizens keep and bear them to protect themselves, their families, their communities and their Constitution. But Rep. Swalwell would make these citizens felons, though these patriots are only a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants.
Of course, he wants to make these patriots felons because they are a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants. After all, that’s what leftist Democrats like him are.
Now, we know that some Americans would resist this kind of tyranny. People all over the world are resisting the elite’s commands. The Brits Brexited. The French are rioting because they don’t want to sacrifice their livelihoods on behalf of the global elites’ weird weather religion. And a decree that the Second Amendment is not a thing anymore would certainly provoke some serious pushback here.
That’s why it’s fair to ask Rep. Bloodlust how much blood he’s prepared to shed to achieve his goal of disarming Normal Americans.
Rep. Swalwell, some people are going to fight rather than cave in, so what’s the number of bodies you would be willing to pile up to win? Let’s put aside the right or wrong of resistance; it’ll be a thing. It’ll happen. You’re from near San Francisco, so you don’t know any real Americans, but even though I am from that hellhole too, I’ve met a few Americans in my travels. They are an ornery people who don’t give in to the kind of bullying you advocate. So, you’re going to have to kill some people to do what you want, and I just want to know how many you’re prepared to off to achieve your goal.
After all, it’s not as if you Democrats don’t already have a history of killing people for having guns you disapprove of.
Remember Waco? The raid on David Koresh’s compound was because his weird band of misfits allegedly had scary, outlawed guns. That’s why Democrat Janet Reno initially decided to send in the troops. The government got four of our ATF agents killed, then slaughtered the resisters, including women and kids.
Was it worth it? Maybe these creepy cultists were violating the law, but was making sure they didn’t have guns that were scary worth shooting or burning alive about 80 people, including four cops?
Was it?
So, in light of his party’s track record, I want to know how many people Rep. Swalwell – who fancies himself a potent Democrat presidential contender – is prepared to see die so he can ensure Americans are disarmed in order to please the liberal Californians he represents. How many?
One?
One hundred?
One thousand?
One hundred thousand?
More?
How many corpses would Eric Swalwell and his blue state buddies accept because they don’t think some law-abiding citizen in Oklahoma should be allowed to choose what kind of weapon he has, because they think they should choose for him, and that that choice should be “None?”
On Twitter, which is a wonderful thing because it makes people truly reveal themselves, one gentleman pointed out the not-so-far-fetched notion that mass gun confiscation (let’s leave the problematic logistics for the gun-hating fascists aside) would spark a civil war. But Rep. Swalwell was not worried; he observed that a bunch of citizens with rifles could not stand up to a military armed with nuclear weapons.
Well, that’s a troubling notion.
Now, Congressman Strangelove properly took a lot of grief for suggesting nuking fellow Americans, but even if you accept his backtracking about how this was a joke – nothing’s funnier than suggesting the mass murder of fellow Americans! – he only put nukes off limits. What killing systems are still on the table? Infantry? Artillery? Bombers? Because his answer assumed that he would support prosecuting a war against those who failed to obey and submit to arrest.
So, Congressman, what means of destructions are still on the table to use against fellow Americans who refuse to allow you to strip them of their Second Amendment rights because you Bay Area liberals want to show those hicks in Jesusland who’s boss? Is shooting them okay? Shelling them? Bombing them, just not with nukes?
Having seen the fruits of oppression overseas, I find this troubling. Actually, that’s putting it lightly. I find it horrifying. I’ve written about it in my novels about how our country could be ripped apart by leftist oppression. My just-released book Wildfire paints a most unpretty picture, but my predictions keep coming true. Try as I might, nothing I write speculating about what they would do if given the chance seems to hold a candle to what people like Congressman Stalin tell us they are actually willing to do to crush us under their Gucci loafers.
Understand that the leftists with Swalwell’s mentality are not driven by notions of justice or reason, but by cold hatred for Normal Americans. We’ve been disobedient. We’ve been defiant. We’ve refused to surrender our means of defending our own sovereignty to our elite overlords, and that is intolerable.
After all, a man without a rifle is not a citizen. He’s a serf, subject to the whims and will of his overlords who you damn well know are never giving up the guns their minions keep and bear.
Look at England. They gave up their guns. Now, the police watch their Twitter feeds and arrest them if they say unapproved things. That’s not a bug to our liberal elite; that’s a feature. That’s the goal.
Wait, this is crazy talk! If we disarm and only a government controlled by the liberal elite has guns, our overlords will be totally cool. They’ll respect our right to say and do what we want. They’ll allow us to practice our religion as we please. You know, just like liberals respect the rights of normal people where they are in control, like on college campuses, or on social media, or in the municipalities that hassle Christian cake shops.
Get woke. They hate you, and your freedom to tell them to pound sand sticks in their collective collectivist craw. Ignore the leftist media and the Fredocon collaborators who demand you not believe your lying eyes or ears when they tell you what they intend to do to you if given the chance.
So, the question remains. Our liberal elite betters think we should be stripped of those scary bangsticks the Constitution protects, and we disagree. So, Rep. Swalwell, how many Americans are you willing to kill to fulfill your vision of a disarmed, defenseless, servile population of docile subjects?
One?
One hundred?
One thousand?
One hundred thousand?
More?
My third novel about America after it splits into two countries, one red and one blue, just dropped. Check out Wildfire and see what could happen if we fail to defend our freedom in the face of people who want to make us Venezuela del Norte.
Any amount will do; as long as it isn't THEIR's!
I shudda read ahead!
The Left has already wiped out over 60,000,000 future American citizens: so what’s a few more gonna hurt?
GMTA
I really can't stay—-Baby it's cold outside I've got to go away—-Baby it's cold outside This evening has been—-Been hoping that you'd drop in So very nice—-I'll hold your hands, they're just like ice My mother will start to worry—-Beautiful, what's your hurry My father will be pacing the floor—-Listen to the fireplace roar So really I'd better scurry—-Beautiful, please don't hurry well Maybe just a half a drink more—-Put some music on while I pour
The neighbors might think—-Baby, it's bad out there Say, what's in this drink—-No cabs to be had out there I wish I knew how —-Your eyes are like starlight now To break this spell—-I'll take your hat, your hair looks swell I ought to say no, no, no, sir—-Mind if I move a little closer At least I'm gonna say that I tried—-What's the sense in hurting my pride I really can't stay—-Baby don't hold out Ahh, but it's cold outside
Why It's So Rapey: Dubbed by Urban Dictionary as the "Christmas Date Rape Song," "Baby, It's Cold Outside" has endured as a classic date rape anthem because (a) it was ahead of its time; (b) the lyrics are unimaginably date-rapey—-the woman tells the man her "answer is no," but he continues to ply her with drinks and exaggerated weather-based fears until she sleeps over; and (c) it's nevertheless celebrated as a Christmas classic.
https://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/columns/the-sexist/blog/13117979/top-five-date-rape-anthems
Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.
While the Neighbors keep ‘em busy We take them out. All at once, quickly, one Apricot Shot each.
Bookmark
Track the line of fire.
an ocean of blood, as long as not one drop of it was theirs
Well this semioldfart plans on them bleeding more than Us.
100%
“Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.”
I thought it was East Asia, but memory plays tricks on us sometimes. We live in a bizarro time when the deceivers cite stories like ‘1984’ to argue why we should trust them.
Just this week we’ve got a known perjurer telling the media (and thus, us) that “facts are stubborn things”. I hope that the Clintons and the rest of the left remember that Comey’s butt-covering efforts were enough to tip the scale against Hillary. Doesn’t matter that a million other paper cuts cost her the White House, Comey should face her wrath. We know we can never count on the Republicans to mete out any justice.
I did too; but to be sure I googled.
Something came up that said Eurasia and I just grabbed it.
At the start of the book, Oceania is at war with Eurasia. They have always been at war with Eurasia. That's the political consensus, and all historic documents agree. However, Winston Smith (the protagonist) remembers a time five years ago when Oceania was instead at war with Eastasia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.