Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Memo: FBI recommended Michael Flynn not have lawyer present during interview, did not warn of false
washington examiner ^ | 12/11/2017 | byron york

Posted on 12/11/2018 11:11:57 PM PST by bitt

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who arranged the bureau's interview with then-national security adviser Michael Flynn at the White House on Jan. 24, 2017 — the interview that ultimately led to Flynn's guilty plea on one count of making false statements — suggested Flynn not have a lawyer present at the session, according to newly-filed court documents. In addition, FBI officials, along with the two agents who interviewed Flynn, decided specifically not to warn him that there would be penalties for making false statements because the agents wanted to ensure that Flynn was "relaxed" during the session.

The new information, drawn from McCabe's account of events plus the FBI agents' writeup of the interview — the so-called 302 report — is contained in a sentencing memo filed Tuesday by Flynn's defense team.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 20170124; 302; 302report; aclumia; andrewmccabe; civilrights; coup; deepstate; fbi; flynn; flynnmccabe; mccabe; obamunism; secretpolice; suborningperjury
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Memo: FBI recommended Michael Flynn not have lawyer present during interview, did not warn of false statement consequences
1 posted on 12/11/2018 11:11:57 PM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

Byron York has been on top of these events.. ping


2 posted on 12/11/2018 11:12:44 PM PST by bitt (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

A total set up. Think about how removed Flynn was from any of the fake Russia narratives. And the big lie was about him simply doing his job on the transition. This is completely outrageous.


3 posted on 12/11/2018 11:14:49 PM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

How could Michael Flynn be stupid enough to talk to any LEO without an attorney?


4 posted on 12/11/2018 11:16:09 PM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Corruption. FBI is a political formation


5 posted on 12/11/2018 11:17:13 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

innocence, and misplaced trust and respect for the FBI.


6 posted on 12/11/2018 11:18:29 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

And that smells of entrapment..


7 posted on 12/11/2018 11:20:36 PM PST by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

“A total set up. “


What is outrageous is there has been no consequence to the conspirators of this cabal while they should have been hang in public to make an example.
I am wondering who has been the worst traitor (apart the “trust-Sessions” fidiots) to Trump’s drain-the-swamp agenda, Sessions or Wray.


8 posted on 12/11/2018 11:25:27 PM PST by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I would not talk to the FBI without a lawyer present unless I had a 10mm submachine gun present. Hat tip to Travis McGee (Matt Bracken), Enemies Foreign and Domestic.


9 posted on 12/11/2018 11:26:22 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

I thought he was supposed to be smart?


10 posted on 12/11/2018 11:26:37 PM PST by proust ("The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

wasn’t it this interview after which Comey said the FBI guys initially said Flynn was ok ?

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-comey-told-congress-fbi-agents-didnt-think-michael-flynn-lied

Did this set-up start higher than McCabe ? ...
2 days after the interview, Sally Yates warns the WH about Flynn ?


11 posted on 12/11/2018 11:27:38 PM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

innocence, and misplaced trust and respect for the FBI.

The FBI has successfully torched any positive reputation it had.


12 posted on 12/11/2018 11:27:45 PM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NoCmpromiz

They trapped Flynn and gave Hillary “The Princess and the Pea” treatment.

“Your Highness, before we discuss the weather for 5 minutes and then call it a day, would you care for a coffee warm-up?”


13 posted on 12/11/2018 11:28:35 PM PST by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bitt
"In one striking detail, footnotes in the Flynn memo say the 302 report cited was dated Aug. 22, 2017 — nearly seven months after the Flynn interview. It is not clear why the report would be written so long after the interview itself."

7 months to write a 302? That's pure horse$hit.

What law enforcement agency allows paperwork, whether it be an interview report, an incident report, an arrest report, or any other type of report that could end up in a court of law, be delayed that long? That's plain incompetence. The lateness of the 302 being submitted, coupled with the fact that the DOJ has refused Congress' requests to view them makes it perfectly clear that something is definitely afoul with the whole thing. And what law enforcement agency representative has the right to recommend to an American citizen, that he shouldn't bring a lawyer with him when he's being interviewed by FBI agents? This was a set-up from the get-go, and I can't believe that General Flynn fell for it. After 30 years in the military, he should have been on high alert. He'd already ticked McCabe off after going to bat for Robyn Gritz, a decorated female counterterrorism agent that had accused McCabe and higher ups of sexual discrimination. But then it's quite possible, that Flynn never realized the feathers he'd ruffled.

14 posted on 12/11/2018 11:54:32 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Having a lawyer present is Flynn's Constitutional right.

It appears a substantial lawsuit is in order.

Hillary got fired from the Watergate Committee when she tried to get the rule changed to deny Richard Nixon legal representation.

15 posted on 12/11/2018 11:56:06 PM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

For the same reason any cop would talk to any other cop. If you don’t believe you’ve done anything wrong, know that you’ve done nothing wrong, you have no reason to think anything different.

The kicker to me is, neither of the agents that conducted the interview, Strzok being one of them, thought he lied. And if I’m not mistaken, stated so in their report on the interview. Yet, somehow Mueller and his henchmen ignored that and charged him, anyway.

On the local law enforcement level, that wouldn’t happen. If the DAs office was adamant about something they would conduct their own investigation with their own investigators. They’d have to because the local cops would say in their testimony, when the Defense calls them, that they concluded no PC existed for a warrant.

Every single solitary thing about criminal procedure and prosecutions has been thrown out the window with regards to this debacle. I don’t trust Dershowitz for anything, but he does seem to care more about the law and criminal procedure than any of these hacks. The same thing goes for Turley. Both admitted liberals and both on record, repeatedly, saying that this thing is a joke.

Turley brought up, yesterday, that it appears they’re going to try and go after the President for campaign finance. Something Turley said was damn near impossible to get a conviction on. He added that they through everything and the kitchen sink at Edwards, he was using campaign money and resources and he still walked. With regards to then, Candidate Trump, money was exchanged, NDA signed, and all through the testimony of an admitted liar who’s about to go to prison because he couldn’t provide Mueller with the smoking gun. Any lawyer worth a damn, and that ain’t many, should be up in arms overall of this and the abuse’s perpetrated by the DOJ, FBI and Mueller. I’m actually surprised that no defense attorney’s have filed to have any cases involved with McCabe, Strzok, and Priestap reviewed and requesting a retrial. Federal courts take very seriously, any type of lying, once it’s exposed. And that goes all the way to how agents conduct themselves, administratively, as well.

If you ever hear that an agent has been, Giglio’d, that means they cannot testify in federal court, meaning they can’t work any cases, but whatever they did wasn’t sufficient enough to fire them. And, yes, there are plenty of federal agents that are Giglio’d and still collecting a 6 figure check to order office supplies.


16 posted on 12/12/2018 12:04:03 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

It was doing the very first days of the new admin. and Gen. Flynn was taking briefings from various members of the security/intel community. He did not know until the agents were in his office that it was not about another briefing of some kind for Flynn’s role as the new National Security Advisor. Ofc we can wish he had handled it differently at that point, but he knew he had done nothing wrong. He probably did not realize at that moment the extremes to which the Deep State scum would go to set him up. He still thought he was talking to professional colleagues.


17 posted on 12/12/2018 12:06:03 AM PST by Trump_the_Evil_Left (FReeper formerly known as Enchante (registered Sept. 5, 2001), back from the wild....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

That’s not incompetence. Those reports are done, immediately. Especially since the FBI doesn’t allow any type of recording of interviews, like every other law enforcement agency does. That’s why they always interview in pairs. One asks the questions. The other takes the notes and records the answers. And, once the report is written, the notes are destroyed. So, even if the report is completely different than what the notes say, there is no record of what was originally written down. The report stands as the final document.

It’s exactly how they handle elections, nowadays. If it’s close, enter Brenda Snipes - Ballot Harvesting, anything to get the results they want.

If she had won, no one would say a word to Gen Flynn. She didn’t and as they tried to chip away at the President, they had to pull out all the stops.

FBI, initially stated that they didn’t think he lied. They got into the file and made the appropriate changes, after the fact and now we are here.


18 posted on 12/12/2018 12:11:28 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

Federal criminal prosecution is not beanbag. The courts have ruled many times that prosecutors, FBI agents and police may lie, cheat, threaten, intimidate, coerce and deceive to extract cooperation and obtain evidence from witnesses. This is the dark side of the criminal justice system. It requires a strong stomach. It can be used against even the president.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=234673


19 posted on 12/12/2018 12:11:55 AM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bitt

How very Attny Hillary Clinton of them.


20 posted on 12/12/2018 12:14:26 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson