Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Exhibit A is a very superficial January 24, 2017, memo to the file from when Peter Strzok and another, unnamed FBI agent interviewed Trump’s incoming National Security Adviser Flynn. The interview was at the direction of Andrew McCabe. It is reported that McCabe wrote Exhibit A. Both Strzok and McCabe are Trump haters and coup plotters as demonstrated by their text messages and emails. McCabe’s wife took over $700,000 from Friends of Hillary to run as a Democrat in Virginia for the State Senate.

As an attorney, I believe that nothing in Exhibit A would allow Judge Sullivan to sustain a criminal conviction of Flynn under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for lying to the FBI coup-plotters. We don’t know what is blacked out, but the context around those redactions leave it improbable that any lie by Flynn is recorded in those interview notes.

Exhibit B is a formal FBI Form FD-302 from August 22, 2017, of an interview with Peter Strzok This is not a Form 302 of an interview with Michael Flynn. This is an interview taken of Peter Strzok. The August 22, 2017, FD-302 starts out “(U/FOUO) FBI Deputy Assistant Director (DAD) Peter P. Strzok was interviewed in his office in the Special Counsel’s office in Washington D.C.”

Inside of Exhibit B, the August 22, 2017, Form 302 states that Peter Strzok wrote a different Form 302 earlier about the January 24, 2017, interview with Flynn.

1 posted on 12/14/2018 7:48:12 PM PST by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Moseley
Inside of Exhibit B, the August 22, 2017, Form 302 states that Peter Strzok wrote a different Form 302 earlier about the January 24, 2017, interview with Flynn.

I'd throw out all FIB cases based on their 302s ilo actual transcripts of taped interviews.

It's an ethical nightmare to continue this nonobjective internal reporting.

I'd suggest that these daze the FIB are operating in a totally UnConstitutional manner.

2 posted on 12/14/2018 7:54:56 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Muller’s self serving addition to the memorandum really pissed me off. Condescending SOB.


3 posted on 12/14/2018 7:56:49 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Ruth Bader Ginsburg doctor is a taxidermist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Also please watch this video: “Never talk to the PoPos, and Why.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE

It’s pretty compelling.


4 posted on 12/14/2018 7:57:12 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

We need to get rid of the idea of 302’s as standalone evidence. If it’s not recorded, then it should be treated as hearsay.


5 posted on 12/14/2018 8:00:30 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Just watched the discussion on this on Laura Ingraham with Dershowitz and Greg Jarrett. It was real good.


6 posted on 12/14/2018 8:01:00 PM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

He used fraudulent documents to get a FISA court subpoena.

He never went back and notified the court it was fraudulent.

If he couldn’t figure that out, just how qualified, and just how moral a man is he?

This guy is corrupt.

He couldn’t get trump, so he’s going to take everyone down he can with process violations.

Only one of these crimes took place before his investigation. ONE!

Every other crime was a process crime, after they got entangled with him. And he can’t prove they did anything else wrong.

The man is a nightmare of an investigator. He’s just a corrupt individual.


15 posted on 12/14/2018 8:28:49 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 frm 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Good article.


16 posted on 12/14/2018 8:34:04 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Really hope the judges dismisses the case. What a Christmas present that would be. Especially to the Flynns.

And a real kick in the nuts to Mueller.


17 posted on 12/14/2018 8:37:51 PM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Just listening to the Tucker rerun on this.

If Flynn’s lie was not remembering everything, then Comey just lied to Congress over 200 times by not remembering during his testimony.


18 posted on 12/14/2018 9:09:08 PM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Just listening to the Tucker rerun on this.

If Flynn’s lie was not remembering everything, then Comey just lied to Congress over 200 times by not remembering during his testimony.


19 posted on 12/14/2018 9:09:18 PM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
The missing earlier Form FD-302 would be enough for Judge Sullivan to throw out Mueller’s case against Flynn entirely.

I assume you meant to say :

The missing earlier Form 302 (sans the prefix FD-) would be enough for Judge Sullivan to throw out Mueller’s case against Flynn entirely,.

I assume that, because you identify exhibit B as being an FD-302 standard FBI form, and you stated that the 302 form was the one missing, in the first sentence of the paragraph that contains the sentence highlighted above. I really only mention it in case you missed it and want to correct it.

Great article though, and I enjoyed and agree with what you have written.

37 posted on 12/15/2018 9:43:45 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Sullivan has already had cause to throw this out. He did not do so.

I think he is posturing for optics, not unlike the House investigation RINOs.

I continue to default to the assumption that the DC fix is in until it actually is not.


42 posted on 12/15/2018 4:32:06 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson