Posted on 12/15/2018 3:38:01 PM PST by Kaslin
The Weekly Standard will be no more. There is no real reason we are witnessing the magazine’s demise other than deep pettiness and a personal desire for bureaucratic revenge on the part of a penny-ante Machiavellian who works for its parent company.
There would at least be a larger meaning to the Standard’s end if it were being killed because it was hostile to Donald Trump. But I do not believe that is the case. Rather, I believe the fissures in the conservative movement and the Republican party that have opened up since Trump’s rise provided the company man with a convenient argument to make to the corporation’s owner, Philip Anschutz, that the company could perhaps harvest the Standard’s subscriber-base riches and then be done with it.
That this is an entirely hostile act is proved by the fact that he and Anschutz have refused to sell the Standard because they want to claim its circulation for another property of theirs. This is without precedent in my experience in publishing, and I’ve been a family observer of and active participant in the magazine business for half a century.
The creation of the Weekly Standard was my proudest professional moment. When Bill Kristol and I conceived the magazine at the end of 1994, our purpose was to create a publication that would help guide and keep honest the hard-charging Republican party that had scored its stunning lopsided victory over Bill Clinton’s Democrats. This putative magazine would not cheerlead for Newt Gingrich’s Republicans, but instead represent the best thinking about how to lead the country through a new conservative era. We were criticized for not being part of the team from the get-go. Indeed, after the first issue came out in September 1995, a wag at a weekly meeting in Washington chaired by Grover Norquist handed out a parody of the Standard based on the precept that we had already gone off the reservation and weren’t being properly supportive of the Gingrich era.
As a matter of character, while the kindest and most generous of men, Bill is more the type for an ironic and deflating joke than a good “rah rah” about anything. And for better or worse, I was the kind of player on your softball team who would side with the other on a close call at second base if that’s what it looked like to me. Thus, not being a team player was part of the DNA of the Standard from the outset, for better or worse. Our loyalty was to the ideas in which we believed, not to the Republican party. And to be truthful in our analysis. That sounds pompous, and I hate sounding pompous, but it’s true. And it has been ever thus in the 23 years of the Standard’s existence, from its opening personal essay (the “casual”) to the cultural essays of the back-of-the-book and even the parodies that bring the weekly issue to its close.
The compact between the Standard and its readership was that it would reflect an expansive conservative vision of America and the world and would evaluate the politics of the present moment as honestly as its writers and editors knew how. It would speak to, and from within, the conservative movement without being a Republican Party sheet. This approach was an immediate success. The Standard was the only successful high-end magazine launch of its time and, I believe, the last important print magazine created in America before the Internet began its search-and-destroy mission against those things published on the pulp products of dead trees.
To be sure, it has never made money. Magazines like it never make money. But its circulation has always been extraordinarily healthy in opinion-journal terms. And within the giant corporations run by the wealthy men who started the Standard and then bought it—Rupert Murdoch and then Anschutz—its annual losses were a rounding error, akin to the budget for the catering on one of their blockbuster movie productions. But if Anschutz had been motivated by an unwillingness to bear the cost any longer, he could have sold the Standard. He chose not to. He chose to kill it.
The cessation of the Standard is an intellectual and political crime. I hope and expect its subscribers, tens of thousands of whom have been with the magazine since its very first day, will demand refunds rather than serve as passive participants in this act of politico-cultural murder. If you are a Standard subscriber but not yet a COMMENTARY reader, write to me at johnpodhoretz@commentarymagazine.com. Have I got a deal for you.
Your proper home is here.
As for me—I am heartbroken.
It wasn’t murder it was suicide.
The weakly standard was obvious agitprop by trotskyites pretending to be republicans. No one in their right mind would EVER read that crap.
We can thank @ssholes like them for the rise of Donald Trump.
I am a nationalist, not a Republican. And I used to be a reader of The Weekly Standard until they revealed themselves as nothing more than a propaganda rag for war merchants and big-government globalists.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Thank you Philip Anschutz for killing this POS rag. If the neocons had even some small measures of success to interrupt their string of failures over the last three decades, maybe there’d be an argument to be had. But they don’t. From H.W. getting tossed to the Iraq War disaster to McCain and Romney, it’s just been one giant fail after the next for everything they’ve been allowed to get their hands on.
What a great read! Love me some shadenfreude!
We just couldn’t fight enough wars in the Middle East for long enough to save this neocon magazine. G_d knows we tried.
################
Brutal truth!
I think rather than being murdered, the Weekly Standard made it’s own bed and had to lie in it.
John Podhoretz may have pedigree but he’s an idiot.
B-O.O....H-O.O.
The cessation of something that really wasn’t all that intellectual can hardly be called an intellectual crime. The only political crime may be that this so-called political rag lasted this long. I do hope Podhoretz doesn’t take too long getting over himself, lest there be more of his whining on various forums.
The WS died of self-inflicted suicide.
Its Never Trumper stance was too much for conservatives to put up with.
And under Bill Kristol’s leadership, it became a fringe publication.
Good riddance and it won’t be missed.
He is not going to blame him, because he is just like him. When his goal was finally realized with the election of Donald Trump, and Republican control of both houses of congress, he nitpicked the leader Americans chose, and still does. He is equally as despicable.
No, not murder...suicide, since it was a NeverTrumper magazine...next on the suicide watch National Review...WFB would shut it down if he was alive today...
"I am probably not going to be your favoroite reply, but I am quite grateful you posted this."
"If you read through this article, you get a picture of Bill Kristol's behavior through the last few years, and it is obvious that as I have often pointed out, he chooses positions and personalities which are detrimental to the Republican party. He isn't a conservative at all."
"He is a mole."
"This article fails to document his long campaign to get Colin Powell to run as the Republican nominee in 2000. This is the same Colin Powell which Kristol now routinely trashes."
"Kristol was originally backing Powell because he knew it would cause a split in the Republicans. Now he trashes Powell as Secretary of State, for the same reason."
"So, thanks for posting this article, as it documents other incidences of the same type of behavior."
Kristol and the Weekly Standard have always been this way.
It’s hard to figure which is the best news Lil Paulie being gone or the weakly stranded being gone.
Same old Taft-Dewey schism.
Quote “When Bill Kristol and I conceived the magazine at the end of 1994, our purpose was to create a publication that would help guide and keep honest the hard-charging Republican party that had scored its stunning lopsided victory over Bill Clinton’s Democrats. This putative magazine would not cheerlead for Newt Gingrich’s Republicans, but instead represent the best thinking about how to lead the country through a new conservative era. ”
In other words intellectual circle jerkers who could navel gaze spat on every decision the conservative movement made. Relentlessly until they were out of power. The surprisingly they went out of business but not before they were seen as nothing but useless tool for progressives.
Good riddance. Maybe I’m harsh. Maybe not. I’m tired of conservatives eating their own over the 5 percent that there is disagreement about. Got that 5% I say adios Mother F’kers.
“JOHN PODHORETZ” has a pedigree?
What; between a pod person and a whore?
That’s called a MUTT where I come from!
So true. For how many years have we “played nice” only to be slapped in the face by the Demo-fascist Party? We were the ones that gave money to the GOP-E, and what did we get but a bunch of pantywaists content to let the Marxists destroy our country. NO MORE MR. NICE GUY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.