Posted on 12/17/2018 1:29:39 PM PST by conservative98
The apparent omission of a key document from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s latest filing in the case of Michael Flynn could cause turbulence at Tuesday's scheduled sentencing hearing for the former national security adviser.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
So he was convicted based on what they claimed was in this document, and now they’ve deleted that document.
Judge Sullivan has already been made aware of what happens to those who defy the Commies in power.
There is an article explaining the likelihood the 302 document has been filed under seal.
The “missing” documents may be filed under seal. Until tomorrow, everything is speculation.
I’m not a lawyer, but shouldn’t a reasonable judge ask: “why did the FBI go to his office in the first place????”
No crime had been committed. No one was under investigation. It seems the ONLY reason to have gone to meet Flynn was for the purpose of entrapment.
Margot Cleveland made a good case that the missing documents were filed under seal:
https://thefederalist.com/2018/12/17/heres-whats-weird-robert-muellers-latest-michael-flynn-filing/
Don’t interrupt the hand-wringing over all this “fake news,” dude. LOL.
There is a new sheriff in town and that crap does not fly.
It was filed under seal, the docket has gap numbering.
There sure are a lot of excitement over this.
Meanwhile - one side is getting punished and the other side continues to skate !
Did Mueller really just ignore a federal judge’s order?
Not likely. Rather, the special counsel likely...
That’s her opinion
If Mueller has destroyed records he should be indited.
The DOJ is the Department of Entrapment...
Ninety percent never go to trail...
The process by which the FBI keeps written notes of contacts instead of recordings must end.
Even if the FBI could be trusted, this is still a bad idea. And the FBI is far, far from being trusted.
my question is if there was no investigation at the time they spoke and they told him no attorney was needed does that mean that at any time I am talking with an fbi agent I can be arrested for not being truthful.
Example... I meet my friend the FBI agent for lunch we start talking he asks me what I was up to last night I lie and say I stayed home last night and watched a movie not wanting to admit I was t a massage parlor. later on that day an investigation opens up because that night a masseuse is murder at the massage parlor. he fbi agent is assigned the case finds out that I was at the parlor that night in the course of the investigation. me not knowing anything about the murder and thinking that all I was doing was having lunch with the agent not giving testimony is charged with lying to a fedral agent. set to jail for it despite the fact that someone else is arrested for the murder
The concepts on display in my example is what I think happened to general Flynn with the exception of the fact that the agents were investigating but Flynn had not a clue about the crime they were investigating in fact there was no legal case at the time.
Is it possible the judge could drop everything and let Flynn off? I don’t know the legalities the potential outcomes based on this info (and I didn’t sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night, either).
Thank you.
This awesome article by Rex fits right in:
The Great Sacrifice: How Lt General Michael Flynn Saved the Trump Presidency
Whatever Judge Emmett Sullivan decides tomorrow, one fact remains: on February 13, 2017 Lt General Flynn took a bullet and resigned to save the Trump Presidency. As REX explains, It was an act of incredible heroism and may well be the decisive turning point in POTUS Trump’s war against The Swamp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.