Posted on 12/17/2018 1:29:39 PM PST by conservative98
Unless you want to give up going to the massage parlor, I would avoid having lunch with FBI agents.
I think soetoro's pal,Sally Yates, sent them to manufacture a perjury charge.
She's the one that brought up the Logan Act but Flynn did nothing illegal in talking to Kisylak as he was the National Security Advisor to the President Elect.
They already knew what was said as they tapped the call and then illegally unmasked Flynn.
The FIBBERS don't record interviews or interrogations because it would make it too difficult for them to lie.
Would that seriously happen in your example? You’d be charged for lying to an FBI agent even if the conversation was outside the bounds of an investigation and was for lack of better words, “off the record”?
So basically the FBI can lie to their hearts content even if only to get someone else to lie to them in order to charge that person for lying to an FBI agent? Is that the double standard? Is that how it w0rks?
Nonexistent documents are always missing.
You can’t delete what never was in the first place.
Mueller made its existence up to begin with, never having anticipated being made to produce it.
You mean things are not always as they seem to FReeper experts? Hmmph.
Judge Smith's demand for pertinent documents gets to the heart of the matter because the next questions are whether those documents were provided to the defense and whether are sufficient facts to show that a crime was actually committed by General Flynn. If not, the validity of Flynn's guilty plea is in doubt and should not be accepted by the court. Notably, Judge Smith could go on to enforce the benefits to Flynn of the guilty plea and impose other sanctions for misconduct on the government and its attorneys. Judge Smith could thereby end the prosecution of General Flynn and give the Special Counsel some well-deserved judicial pushback.
If you are ever questioned, say only one word: LAWYER. No name, no address, no answers to anything.
They’ve earned our disrespect.
That’s it.
I commented on that article thread that if the 302 report had been filed under seal, surely Judge Sullivan would have already known that on Wednesday when the original sentencing report was submitted. And since Sullivan demanded the original Pientka 302 be turned in by Friday, why didn't Mueller just tell him that it had already been submitted under seal on Wednesday? If Mueller did file it under seal on Friday, it hasn't been reported. There's isn't any ban on the media reporting that sealed documents were turned over to the court is there?
Our justice system has become truly pathetic.
Great tag line...I have it over my tack room door on a sign with John Wayne’s likeness.
——Strzok was removed from the Russia probe in late July 2017 ——
Rather than listening to all the garbage about process crimes, Americans should be asking the Queation.....Why is Strozak still alive?
Thanks. Do you own horses?
Nonsense. The judge wont do a damn thing but follow the Swamp script. You think he wants HIS family destroyed?
Bingo! The judge has been warned to “trust Mueller”.
Documents. No documents. It all doesn’t matter. What matters is you’re guilty. Mueller will figure out a crime later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.