Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/15/2019 10:52:01 AM PST by rockinqsranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rockinqsranch
Our questions include asking how the Army now plans to respond to military and humanitarian aid in remote and austere locations, where ports and harbor infrastructure do not exist?

The Navy?

2 posted on 01/15/2019 10:54:00 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch

So much for a sequel to The Wackiest Ship In The Army.


4 posted on 01/15/2019 10:57:38 AM PST by wally_bert (We're low on dimes in fun city.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch

Wanted: Cheap boat with good motor...


5 posted on 01/15/2019 10:59:01 AM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch

When I was on Swift Boats in Nam, 1965-66, I was amazed at how many water craft the Army had.
More than once we had to go on a search for some poor sergeant, wandering around totally lost, or as one boat ‘commander’ told us when we found him, “I don’t navigates at night”.


6 posted on 01/15/2019 11:02:18 AM PST by Cuttnhorse (Never fear the cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch

Next War they will have no need for boats or water craft..


11 posted on 01/15/2019 11:15:14 AM PST by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch
USC Title 10 requires the Army to maintain a fleet of organic watercraft (and aircraft) necessary to perform its mission.

In 2014, the Army had 118 watercraft. They're selling off their existing landing craft because they're old and worn-out and designed for a different era. In 2017 they let a contract for 36 new landing craft that will be a better complement to the new, heavier, armor-laden vehicles. Behemoths like the 74-ton M1 tank aside, the batteries the Army takes to war now weigh more than the small arms ammunition did in WWII.

14 posted on 01/15/2019 11:34:07 AM PST by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch

For sale: surplus 26 foot Zodiacs , (olive drab, LMG side and bow mounts.

Buy 6 for $600.00!


15 posted on 01/15/2019 11:36:23 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch

I guess the Army is not planning on any seaborne invasions.Will the Army leadership ever learn?


16 posted on 01/15/2019 11:42:35 AM PST by puppypusher ( The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch

Assumption for me here is that this is basically for freshwater riverine/lake use inland. I’m sure that they have other newer capabilities that they use instead of this stuff.

I know in Vietnam the Navy had riverine patrols they utilized. Great book about it by Cutler called Brown Water, Black Berets.

Cutler gave some outstanding speeches while teaching at USNA when I was a mid.


17 posted on 01/15/2019 11:46:18 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch

Wonder if this means they will close Fort Story?


22 posted on 01/16/2019 7:39:11 AM PST by ops33 (SMSgt, USAF, Retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson