Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

In a related thread, Buzzfeed admits it has not seen the actual evidence/report.

Sounds like the early days of the Pee Dossier. IIRC, Buzzfeed was the one who finally published reports about it — so that other news venues could report about it.

Buzzfeed should be listed as ‘zero credible’; no surprise that NBC News would now have an article about the Buzzfeed article.

==

Since it worked then, it should work now — Creative Journalism 101.


20 posted on 01/18/2019 9:09:32 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy
Actually CNN broke the dossier story, then Buzzfeed published the actual dossier.

Then they got sued by people who were accused of thing in it they did not do.

Last I saw the suit was thrown out because a judge ruled that the dossier was itself newsworthy by virtue of the fact it was in the news (CNN, I guess).

But, I do think they did us a favor by printing the entire dossier, this allowed everyone to see how absurd it was, how poorly sourced it was, etc. They probably did more to debunk the "muh Russia" narrative than any other MSM outlet.

92 posted on 01/18/2019 4:51:28 PM PST by Jack Black ("If you believe in things that you don't understand then you suffer" - "Superstition",Stevie Wonder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson