Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: research99
United States v. Wong Kim Ark

U.S. citizenship is determined solely by U.S. law and court rulings. British or any other law has no bearing on how U.S. law defines citizenship.

As long as both her parents were resident aliens or in the process of becoming naturalized citizens, then under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, Harris is a natural born citizen.

Regardless of who the Democrats pick, I'm looking forward to Trump's 2nd term.

32 posted on 01/21/2019 12:48:03 PM PST by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Widget Jr

http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Wong determined citizen, not natural born citizen.

The correct Supreme Court reference is Minor vs Happersett


37 posted on 01/21/2019 12:50:58 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr

“As long as both her parents were resident aliens or in the process of becoming naturalized citizens, then under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, Harris is a natural born citizen.”

Wrong. They ruled that Wong was a citizen, not a natural born Citizen.

And Wong got it wrong about that too. And since the courts can’t make anyone a citizen, make law or change the Constitution, children born to foreign nationals, whether here legally or illegally are CINOs. Citizens in name only.


56 posted on 01/21/2019 12:58:49 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Cocked, locked and ready to ROCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr

You misrepresent the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark.

Ark claimed to be a natural born citizen in the case. Chief Justice Gray clearly agreed with Ark,as attested to by Gray’s written dicta in the ruling.

HOWEVER, the declarative text of the decision is as follows:

“The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

Order affirmed.”

THE RULING DECLARED ARK A CITIZEN,BUT DID NOT DECIDE IF HE WAS NATURAL BORN. SCOTUS HAS NEVER RULED ON IT !!!


109 posted on 01/21/2019 1:55:21 PM PST by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Widget Jr

then under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, Harris is a natural born citizen.


Wong doesn’t say that. It in fact says that Wong was a US citizen with rights the same as if he were a NBC. This was an attempt by the court to prevent “classes” of citizenship.

While ALL citizens have exactly the same rights there is NO right to the Presidency. Eligibility requirements must be met. One must be an NBC.


175 posted on 01/21/2019 4:21:23 PM PST by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry Bear formily known as Ursus Arctos Horrilibis (or U.A. Californicus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson