After Media Pushes U.S. to Take Back Traitorous ISIS Widow, Trump Slams the Door With ONE Tweet

24News ^ | 02-20-2019 | Sheri Urban

[montag813]

by Sheri Urban

The mainstream media has spent the past four days running — by my own Lexis-Nexis count — over 200 articles about a U.S.-born woman turned ISIS terrorist traitor who “regrets” leaving America for the terrorist group, and now wants to come “home” to America.

Nearly every article is sympathetic, portraying a smiling Hoda Muthana as having been young and naive and calling her an “Alabama mom” — like she's Emmylou Harris in a burka. With every shot framing her with her 18-month old child by a murderous ISIS terrorist (now deceased) — one of three ISIS jihadists she has married.

What the media will NOT report is how truly vile this woman is.

According to The Guardian, in 2015, Muthana used Twitter to urge Americans to commit acts of violence on nation holidays like Veteran’s Day and Memorial Day and to “spill all of their blood.”

“Americans wake up! Men and women altogether. You have much to do while you live under our greatest enemy, enough of your sleeping! Go on drivebys, and spill all of their blood, or rent a big truck and drive all over them. Veterans, Patriots, Memorial, etc day … Kill them!”

What a disgusting beast. But now she’s just a smiling “U.S. citizen” that CNN quotes “immigration experts” as claiming “must be allowed to return to America — by law.”

Well just minutes ago, President Donald J. Trump slammed the door on her redemption story with one tweet:

[jjotto]

Skip blog hits:

I have instructed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and he fully agrees, not to allow Hoda Muthana back into the Country!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 20, 2019

[chris37]

Some shameful clickbait there, booooooy.

[oust the louse]

Obama would be celebrating her and her change of heart....

[Don Corleone]

WTG Mr. President

[Alberta's Child]

Nearly every article is sympathetic, portraying a smiling Hoda Muthana as having been young and naive and calling her an “Alabama mom” — like she's Emmylou Harris in a burka.

LMAO.

[Boomer]

When you line your bed with pig shit; you should be forced to sleep in it Muthana - you Muslim pig.

[antidemoncrat]

I’m sure the Democrats will back letting her back in.

[antidemoncrat]

I’m sure the Democrats will back letting her back in.

[marron]

She evidently has a Syrian husband. Since the war is winding down, he can go home and she can go with him.

[Lee'sGhost]

Thank you.

[ryderann]

Will she try to slip into the country before the wall is finished?

[DeathBeforeDishonor1]

Although a person’s service in the armed forces of a foreign country may not constitute a violation of U.S. law, such action could serve as a predicate act for the relinquishment of U.S. citizenship under 349(a)(3) of the INA [8 U.S.C. 1481(a)(3)] under two circumstances. Section 349(a)(3) provides for loss of U.S. nationality if a U.S national voluntarily and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. nationality enters or serves in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the United States or serves in the armed forces of any foreign state as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer.
Note that the administrative presumption of intent to retain nationality does not apply to voluntary service in the armed forces of a state engaged in hostilities against the United States, and thus such action could be viewed as indicative of an intention to relinquish U.S. nationality, although each case is examined on its own with a view to the totality of the circumstances. Military service in a foreign country is not an expatriating act if service is as a soldier who is not an officer, unless the foreign military is engaged in hostilities with the United States.
Further, foreign military service usually does not cause loss of nationality since an intention to relinquish nationality normally is lacking. In adjudicating loss of nationality cases, the Department has established an administrative presumption that a person serving in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities against the United States does not have the intention to relinquish nationality. One who voluntarily serves as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the military of a country not engaged in hostilities with the United States will lose one’s U.S. citizenship only if one intended to relinquish U.S. citizenship when he/she served in the armed forces of a foreign state.

[drpix]

Here's the ploy the Jihadi momma & her allies have decided to use to shop for a judge in the 9th Circuit Court jurisdication:

An attorney for the woman's family, Hassan Shibly, said "The Trump administration continues its attempts to wrongfully strip citizens of their citizenship... Hoda Muthana had a valid US passport and is a citizen. She was born in Hackensack, NJ in October 1994, months after her father stopped being a diplomat."

al.com - 2/20/19

[PetroniusMaximus]

Joe is asking for a corn holing.

[PetroniusMaximus]

And if that strikes you as a non sequitur it is because I posted to the wrong dang thread.

[grey_whiskers]

I think we should investigate, (and wouldn’t be surprised if such investigation led to criminal charges of either immigration fraud or aiding and abetting terrorism), her attorney, *HASSAN* Shibly.

[atc23]

Dastardly clickbait you got going on there Meister Blogger. Just post the whole thing next time

[wastedyears]

I love Trump.

[grey_whiskers]

HASSAN CHOP! (Old Daffy Duck clip)