Skip blog hits:
I have instructed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and he fully agrees, not to allow Hoda Muthana back into the Country!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 20, 2019
Some shameful clickbait there, booooooy.
Obama would be celebrating her and her change of heart....
WTG Mr. President
LMAO.
When you line your bed with pig shit; you should be forced to sleep in it Muthana - you Muslim pig.
I’m sure the Democrats will back letting her back in.
I’m sure the Democrats will back letting her back in.
She evidently has a Syrian husband. Since the war is winding down, he can go home and she can go with him.
Will she try to slip into the country before the wall is finished?
Although a person’s service in the armed forces of a foreign country may not constitute a violation of U.S. law, such action could serve as a predicate act for the relinquishment of U.S. citizenship under 349(a)(3) of the INA [8 U.S.C. 1481(a)(3)] under two circumstances. Section 349(a)(3) provides for loss of U.S. nationality if a U.S national voluntarily and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. nationality enters or serves in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the United States or serves in the armed forces of any foreign state as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer.
Note that the administrative presumption of intent to retain nationality does not apply to voluntary service in the armed forces of a state engaged in hostilities against the United States, and thus such action could be viewed as indicative of an intention to relinquish U.S. nationality, although each case is examined on its own with a view to the totality of the circumstances. Military service in a foreign country is not an expatriating act if service is as a soldier who is not an officer, unless the foreign military is engaged in hostilities with the United States.
Further, foreign military service usually does not cause loss of nationality since an intention to relinquish nationality normally is lacking. In adjudicating loss of nationality cases, the Department has established an administrative presumption that a person serving in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities against the United States does not have the intention to relinquish nationality. One who voluntarily serves as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the military of a country not engaged in hostilities with the United States will lose one’s U.S. citizenship only if one intended to relinquish U.S. citizenship when he/she served in the armed forces of a foreign state.
An attorney for the woman's family, Hassan Shibly, said "The Trump administration continues its attempts to wrongfully strip citizens of their citizenship... Hoda Muthana had a valid US passport and is a citizen. She was born in Hackensack, NJ in October 1994, months after her father stopped being a diplomat."
Joe is asking for a corn holing.
And if that strikes you as a non sequitur it is because I posted to the wrong dang thread.
Dastardly clickbait you got going on there Meister Blogger. Just post the whole thing next time
What I find interesting about this case is the possible clarification of the 14th amendment. In particular, the clause “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
It has been put forward, that the children of diplomats are subject to the jurisdiction of their respective countries. If that is the case, then the “all persons born” is not as wide as previously thought. It might even lead to the end of non-citizen parents birthing their kids here in the US. I.e and end to automatic jus soli citizenship.
Where’s her red hourglass?
Clickbait.
Now, make it stick.
This dumbass didn’t marry just one murderous jihadi asshole; not even two... She married three of these barbarians.
She made her bed(s), she can lie in them...
As a child of a foreign diplomat, she is not eligible for US citizenship. An investigation of her parents should commence to see if they have illegally received any funds they were not entitled to while in the US.