Posted on 02/20/2019 9:19:50 PM PST by yesthatjallen
Democrats are seizing on a bombshell New York Times report as further evidence that President Trump may have sought to obstruct justice in investigations of his campaign and administration.
The Times reported Tuesday that the president asked then-acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker late last year to put U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in charge of the investigation into Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen. Cohen pleaded guilty last year to bank fraud, tax fraud and making payments to silence women alleging that they had affairs with Trump.
Berman, an ally of Trump who donated to his 2016 campaign, had recused himself from the case, and Whitaker did not act on Trump's request, according to the report — which Trump has denied.
Democrats claim it is just the latest example of Trump trying to sway an investigation by influencing the investigator.
“If [the Times report is] true, I cannot understand what other motive there would be for putting someone like Mr. Berman in charge of these investigations other than to kind of help steer the prosecution in a way that’s more favorable to Mr. Trump,” Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) told The Hill.
“Basically it comes down to whether you believe he wanted something like this to happen to further the interest of justice or to further his own interests, and ... given everything we’ve seen, I don’t think it takes a leap of faith to believe that he would’ve done this to further his own interests,” added Krishnamoorthi, a member of the House Oversight and Reform and House Intelligence committees.
Other Democrats described a pattern of actions they deemed inappropriate.
“I think if you just follow the number of incidences and evidence that has been presented involving the president and the Russia investigation and the investigation in the Southern District in New York and others, I think it clearly shows a pattern that the president has tried to use his influence and/or relationship to really interfere with the investigation,” said Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.).
Demings, a former law enforcement officer, said Trump’s decision to tap Whitaker, who was seen as a Trump loyalist, to replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions as one example in which he has appeared to put his thumb on investigations.
Other Democrats pointed to the president’s decision to fire FBI Director James Comey in May 2017.
“If this disturbing New York Times report is accurate, then the President of the United States committed obstruction of justice,” Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) said in a statement on Tuesday.
The White House has denied that Trump sought to put Berman in charge of the Cohen investigation.
“I don’t know who gave you that,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, dismissing the story as “more fake news.”
Trump went a step further on Wednesday, decrying The New York Times as “a true enemy of the people” and calling its reporting “false.”
A Justice Department spokeswoman said in a statement that the White House has not asked Whitaker to interfere in investigations, citing his congressional testimony earlier this month in which he clashed with House Democrats.
“Under oath to the House Judiciary Committee, then-acting Attorney General Whitaker stated that ‘at no time has the White House asked for nor have I provided any promises or commitments concerning the special counsel’s investigation or any other investigation,’ ” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said. “Mr. Whitaker stands by his testimony.”
Demings, who said Whitaker gave “inappropriate or incomplete” responses during his Capitol Hill appearance, called his testimony “pitiful” and “combative.”
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), the House Judiciary Committee’s chairman, has called on Whitaker to clarify his testimony.
“Although the Committee appreciates your decision to appear, Members on both sides of the aisle found many of your answers to be unsatisfactory, incomplete, or contradicted by other evidence,” he said in a statement last week.
Whether Whitaker appears, Demings said, “still remains to be seen.”
Republicans say there is another pressing matter that should be examined: whether top officials at the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) seriously considered invoking the 25th Amendment to remove the president from office.
In particular, Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, and other Republicans say they want to hear from former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein under oath.
McCabe, who has been making the rounds on the cable news shows to promote his new book, has publicly claimed in recent days that Rosenstein met with other top officials to discuss invoking the 25th Amendment after the president fired Comey.
“What’s important to note here is that there are legitimate concerns about things we know happened among top law enforcement at the DOJ and FBI,” said one Republican aide on the House Judiciary Committee. “The FBI was concerned enough to fire McCabe and Strzok for their behavior — those decisions weren’t made by the White House. Americans expect Congress to conduct oversight over the Justice Department, and it’s clear the DOJ needs that accountability right now.” The aide was referencing Peter Strzok, a former FBI agent who was fired for writing anti-Trump text messages.
Other Democrats suggested subsequent testimony from Whitaker is just the first step in examining the claims made in the Times report.
“I think we certainly need to have Mr. Whitaker back, we need to have him under subpoena and we need to press to find out what exactly the president was doing and add that to the list of things that have to be investigated if the rule of law is going to stand in our country,” Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the Intelligence and Judiciary panels, told The Hill.
We don’t bow down to the goddamn government the government is there to serve the people not the other way around.
This is a DNC press release. Literally everything in the article is coming from Democrat officials.
“If the NYT report is true”... if there’s a question it means it’s yet another unfalsifiable allegation. Maggie Habermann again?
It's just more manufactured noise in an attempt to stall the inevitable.
Yeah, because the president doesn’t have the right to choose those people he wants to assist him, or know what’s going on in his own justice department, because...um...um...well...because we don’t like him! Disgusting worms!
One last attempt to wring something out of the nothingburger before people read the (summary of the) Mueller Report.
Charlie Brown: [To Himself] She's right, She would never pull the football away.
AAUGH! [Womp]
Same ole story, different day. The Rats repeat (troll) because Pubs believe its about the football!
If the Democrats think this is obstruction of justice, then they must believe Geoffrey Berman is an unethical criminal as a prosecutor. I wonder what he thinks of all this.
You’re right. If you were “under investigation” by a panel of “hostiles” - Democrat lawyers, Democrat donors, Hillary supporters, etc. - wouldn’t you hope to get just one non-biased person on that panel?
“given everything we’ve seen, I don’t think it takes a leap of faith to believe that he would’ve done this to further his own interests,” added Krishnamoorthi”
The only thing we have seen in this sordid deep swamp coup attempt is Obama administration, CIA, DNI, FBI and DoJ obstruction, illegal unmasking, FISA abuse, lying, perjury and dereliction of duty. We have seen exactly zero illegality from POTUS. I want to see the criminals in this mess punished.
Not. A. Bombshell.
Same old recycled crap.
“BOMSHELL”
Drink...
Dammit.. “BOMBSHELL”
Yet obama did obstruct, used government as a sledge hammer against his enemies (IRS etc) and gave money and support to the islamic, terrorist state of iran. Not so surprisingly, we never read any negative stories about these acts from the leftist media or heard any calls for obama’s impeachment.
The leftist media is the enemy folks.
JoMa
For years Trump has had buildings full of New York lawyers to tell him how to do everything legally. On top of that he has also had the best security people that the world has to offer protecting him and his family. That’s why he acts with such confidence.
This is so much used food.
Even if Trump asked for Berman to be placed in charge of that investigation, that doesn’t mean he asked Berman to take any specific action - I would think you would have to have that in order to claim “obstruction”.
Both Trump and Whitaker deny this happened.
And I can’t help but notice - the ‘Rats filing court case after court case in the Ninth Circus to obtain an almost guaranteed outcome (ruling) - that wouldn’t be the same thing here, would it?
"We didn't find any evidence of collusion, but Trump tried to prevent us from coming to that conclusion..."
The same way the FBI constantly charges people with lying to them even though no crime was committed in the first place.
They simply choose to punish people they don’t like for being innocent.
I thought there was a FR rule against using “bombshell” in a headline...
“I thought there was a FR rule against using “bombshell” in a headline...”
BOOM! Someone finally said it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.