I agree; I am just saying there are logical arguments to a true purist like Paul.
Nothing wrong with understanding those allied with you who disagree. It helps you persuade them to come to your side.
And Paul is persuadable; you just need to frame the issue for him to understand.
Rand is a pure open borders liberation. The constitution is just a smoke screen here. That is all.
I think that’s a fair observation.
I’m not quite as convinced he’s willing to come around on this issue though.