Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Splashdown! SpaceX’s Crew Dragon capsule returns to Earth
Fox News ^ | 3/8/19 | James Rogers

Posted on 03/08/2019 6:29:02 AM PST by Moonman62

SpaceX’s unmanned Crew Dragon capsule has splashed down in the Atlantic Ocean after its historic DEMO-1 test flight to the International Space Station.

The capsule, carrying a dummy dubbed ‘Ripley,’ made its return to Earth after undocking from the ISS early Friday. After plunging through the Earth’s atmosphere, Crew Dragon deployed its parachutes and splashed down at 8:45 a.m. EST.

The six-day test flight is a crucial step in SpaceX’s plan to provide human spaceflight. Lessons learned from DEMO-1 should improve safety when two NASA astronauts strap into a Dragon as early as July.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; nasa; spacex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
America once again has the ability to launch Americans into orbit and return them safely.
1 posted on 03/08/2019 6:29:02 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Jim Bridenstine NASA administrator:

Today’s successful splashdown of the @SpaceX Demo-1 #CrewDragon capsule after its mission to @Space_Station marked another milestone in a new era of human spaceflight. @Commercial_Crew is one step closer to launching American astronauts on American rockets from American soil.


2 posted on 03/08/2019 6:30:27 AM PST by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

If we hadn’t had an America-hating Prez for 8 years, what we’re today seeing might have happened years ago.

“Our top space priority will be MUSLIM OUTREACH”


3 posted on 03/08/2019 6:35:55 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

One small step for a dummy.
One giant leap for America!


4 posted on 03/08/2019 6:42:06 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

This program started when Obama was president.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Crew_Development

The NASA CCDev program followed Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS), a program for developing commercial launch capability to send cargo into low Earth orbit. In December 2009, NASA provided the following description of the CCDev program:

The objectives of the Commercial Crew & Cargo Program are to implement U.S. Space Exploration policy with investments to stimulate the commercial space industry; facilitate U.S. private industry demonstration of cargo and crew space transportation capabilities with the goal of achieving safe, reliable, cost effective access to low-Earth orbit; and create a market environment in which commercial space transportation services are available to Government and private sector customers.

The Commercial Crew & Cargo Program is applying Recovery Act funds to stimulate efforts within the private sector to develop and demonstrate human spaceflight capabilities. NASA plans to use funds appropriated for “Exploration” under the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) through its C3PO to support efforts within the private sector to develop system concepts and capabilities that could ultimately lead to the availability of commercial human spaceflight services. These efforts are intended to foster entrepreneurial activity leading to job growth in engineering, analysis, design, and research and to promote economic recovery as capabilities for new markets are created.

ARRA provided $400 million for space exploration related activities. Of this amount, $50 million is to be used for the development of commercial crew space transportation concepts and enabling capabilities. This effort is known as CCDev. The purpose of this activity is to provide funding to assist viable commercial entities in the development of system concepts, key technologies, and capabilities that could ultimately be used in commercial crew human space transportation systems. This development work must show, within the timeframe of the agreement, significant progress on long lead capabilities, technologies and commercial crew risk mitigation tasks in order to accelerate the development of their commercial crew space transportation concept.


5 posted on 03/08/2019 6:45:10 AM PST by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Muslim outreach? What’s that, when a Muslim astronaut gets marooned outside of his spacecraft and his last effort is to reach out before he or she drifts out into the void?


6 posted on 03/08/2019 6:45:16 AM PST by equaviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Today’s successful splashdown of the @SpaceX Demo-1 #CrewDragon capsule after its mission to @Space_Station marked another milestone in a new era of human spaceflight.

And another nail in the coffin of the Russian space program.

We have been very lucky that none of our astronauts have died in the Russian death traps.

7 posted on 03/08/2019 6:47:03 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Why do they call it a "Crew Dragon" when it is unmanned?
8 posted on 03/08/2019 6:50:37 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

It will be manned soon.


9 posted on 03/08/2019 6:53:20 AM PST by freedumb2003 (As always IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
If we hadn’t had an America-hating Prez for 8 years, what we’re today seeing might have happened years ago.

I'm not so sure about that.

In any event, spaceflight has to be taken out of the political sphere. Otherwise, you get what you see: NASA being used as a platform for all kinds of virtue-signaling and political agendas that have nothing to do with its original mission.

The private sector can take over now. This is the normal model. Government paid for the R&D for the first wide body jet (the C5-A), including for the TF39 high-bypass engine that powered it.

The technology then was transitioned to the private sector. The Boeing 747, Lockheed L-1011, and DC-10 followed, and the noisy TF39 was modified and improved to become the CF6 engine, from which modern high-bypass engine technology was derived. NASA has no large-scale mission at present. To continue to get its budget, it has to prostitute itself out to politicians.

10 posted on 03/08/2019 6:57:45 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

Because it can be manned. This was a test mission.


11 posted on 03/08/2019 7:03:01 AM PST by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; freedumb2003

It was kind of a rhetorical question...


12 posted on 03/08/2019 7:05:17 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

To differentiate between the Cargo Dragon and the Crew Dragon — both are launched on a Falcon but the design of the capsules are different.


13 posted on 03/08/2019 7:07:48 AM PST by DoubleNickle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
zKC0aKr
14 posted on 03/08/2019 7:07:53 AM PST by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Considering that the 747 first flew just a few months after the C5, don’t think you can really say that the 747 came from the C5.

And if I remember correctly, the AF liked Boeing’s bid better, but Lockheed was cheaper.


15 posted on 03/08/2019 7:28:42 AM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

The going up and coming back parts seem a lot faster than the Russian rowboat


16 posted on 03/08/2019 7:36:35 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

That’s what I meant to say.


17 posted on 03/08/2019 7:48:50 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

Only thing missing is a ‘Trunk Monkey.’


18 posted on 03/08/2019 7:54:57 AM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
@Commercial_Crew is one step closer to launching American astronauts on American rockets from American soil.
Wow! That's never been done before. < /sarcasm >

Did history begin for you when you woke up this morning?

Once "the private sector" is addicted to the government teat known as subsidies they will be and do whatever their Democrat masters doling out the cash tell them to do.

Also, like Musk, once on the government teat "the private sector" will never use their own money.

19 posted on 03/08/2019 8:05:50 AM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
old
20 posted on 03/08/2019 8:16:35 AM PST by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson