_________________
On the other hand, Shannon Bream looked great ...... and handled every interview beautifully.
It is a pleasure to hear and see her command a show with such efficiency and ease.
Posted on 03/24/2019 12:09:20 PM PDT by janetjanet998
_________________
On the other hand, Shannon Bream looked great ...... and handled every interview beautifully.
It is a pleasure to hear and see her command a show with such efficiency and ease.
Nadler wants to go after the Pres on obstruction of justice. LOL
Clearly you just need to call them...
I like it!!
When they leave, IIRC, I think his dad is talking to Abe Froman.
Because he calls the guy ‘Abe’. I’ll have to look again.
On that phone call, wasn’t “Cameron” doing his “Abe” voice on another extension?
And Mueller will kick their ass.
He was doing a police chief or something like that, LOL
Just read that 20,000 people have signed a petition recommending the Pulitzer Peace Prize to that lame, female New Zealand Prime Minister. Pathetic as all hell.
>>....but a fair number of right-siders will happily make sure he never has to pay for a drink again in his life.<<
Hmmm...probably true. Which means that we’ll soon be hearing for the first time in a long while now that Mueller is a Republican, so of course he was in on the game all along.
To show you how long it’s been, googling “Is Mueller a ..” doesn’t autofill with “Republican”. Not yet, but it soon will.
Because Faux Snooze is, and has been, making a left turn since the Murdoch boys took over. They are attempting to get the same viewing numbers as CNN and PMSNBC! Well, it won't be long!
>>While Mueller was weak in his obstruction findings, I found Barr’s wording almost a slap at Mueller, ...<<
It probably was a slap of sorts. I think Mueller put his conclusion that way (or non-conclusion) to signal that the entire report contains statements that the Dems can use to continue harassing President Trump. No doubt the MSM and Nadler and Schiff, etc., will pull those statements out and use them without context to continue to paint Trump as an obstructionist.
AG Barr, however, made it quite clear that none of the three requirements for an obstruction charge were met, and all three of them have to be met to bring such a charge.
The most interesting statement by Barr in that regard is at the beginning of the third paragraph of the obstruction section. Essentially, in that paragraph he’s saying that since Trump and his campaign did nothing wrong they’d have no reason to corruptly obstruct an investigation into a conspiracy, so why would he do so?
On the other hand, he could, as Chief Executive, say the entire matter was a waste of time and shut down the investigation. That wouldn’t be obstruction because he would lack corrupt intent. He would just be saving the taxpayers money, knowing the charge was bogus.
>>”The Dem. Media will now discredit Mueller.”<<
No doubt they’ll go back to reminding us he’s a registered Republican.
Police sergeant now that I think about it more (maybe).
>>Mueller probably used the term in the actual report,...<<
He did, and Barr was quoting the report when he wrote that.
Barr said something today that I didn’t appreciate one bit.
He stated something to the effect that although this doesn’t convict Trump, it doesn’t exonerate him either.
What’s that supposed to mean?
It certain does clear him.
Time for idiots to put up or shut up.
Two years plus, is far too long to hobble a president.
At some point we all need to pull together.
Barr didn’t say that. Mueller did.
President TRUMP DAY!
End of Witch Hunt!
MAGA!
WOOHOO!
Love Our President and All that Stood Up For Him!
MAGA!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.