>
That would be nice, but he has to preemptively destroy every conceivable argument against that.
>
Um, sorry, no. If THE basis for all laws says “NOT infringe”, any/every thing after is MOOT.
You “destroy every conceivable argument” by following the plain, simple English of the Law of the Land.
Were that the case, we wouldn’t have gun control laws.
But we do, because persuasive arguments are made; those must be cut down individually & preemptively,
Winning is more than just being right.