Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham; Pravious
Amazing how so few around here ever bothered to find out what options Trump has.

Even more amazing that you'd have Trump scrambling to find a replacement Attorney General (in addition to a replacement NSA) in his first 100 days in office.

He could move a Senate-confirmed officer over from another post

How many cabinet level officers had even been sworn in by the time Sessions recused in early March 2017, and how many of those would be a good fit at the Dept. of Justice?

He could make a recess appointment.

Congress wasn't going to recess for months, so that option was off the table.

He could install a GS-15 for 210 days

The most likely replacement scenario given the circumstances, and as a Washington DC outsider Trump would be at a huge disadvantage trying to choose a replacement from the professional ranks at DOJ, which were chock full of his enemies.

I can't think of a more effective way to hamstring a new administration than by having the Attorney General resign a month after taking office. The notion that you'd think this is an acceptable outcome or that Jeff Sessions is an honorable man is simply a reflection of your own poor judgment.

214 posted on 04/19/2019 5:37:05 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck

“Even more amazing that you’d have Trump scrambling to find a replacement Attorney General (in addition to a replacement NSA) in his first 100 days in office.”

A red-herring. Trump had the ability to replace Sessions at any point that was convenient. He didn’t have to act within the first 100 days.

“How many cabinet level officers had even been sworn in by the time Sessions recused in early March 2017,”

All of them except Perdue at Agriculture and Acosta at Labor.

“Congress wasn’t going to recess for months, so that option was off the table.”

And your evidence that Trump himself considered it “off the table” is exactly nothing. The Senate recessed in August 2017. Had Trump been itching to replace Sessions he had the power to do it.

“Trump would be at a huge disadvantage trying to choose a replacement from the professional ranks at DOJ, which were chock full of his enemies.”

Yeah, because out of the thousand or so GS-15s Trump wouldn’t have been able to find a single one who would have worked out. Of course that’s exactly what he did when he appointed Matt Whitaker.

“is simply a reflection of your own poor judgment.”

Those whose own thinking is filled with weak arguments probably shouldn’t resort to ad hominems. Just a helpful suggestion.


218 posted on 04/19/2019 11:36:46 AM PDT by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson