Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaker of Battleships: 5 Anti-Ship Missiles That Could Kill Any Navy
National Interest ^ | Kyle Mizokami

Posted on 06/05/2019 11:00:21 AM PDT by RevelationDavid

Great update on current anti-ship missile’s… And how they basically make all naval platforms obsolete. Will it take a massacre of our forces before we “get it“…?

“Unlike Harpoon, LRASM fits in both the Mk. 41 vertical launch system silos of the Ticonderoga-class cruisers and Burke destroyers and the Mk. 57 silos on the new Zumwalt-class destroyers. This will allow individual ships to carry many more anti-ship missiles than ever before, although this will impact the number of other missiles, such as the SM-6 surface-to-air missile and ASROC anti-submarine rockets, in the ship’s overall inventory.

After decades of rapid innovation, the end of the Cold War and the subsequent Global War on Terror all but halted anti-ship missile development in the West. A focus on land operations in the Middle East and Central Asia sent Western navies struggling for relevance.

More at link:


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asm; asw; military; navy; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
Great update on current anti-ship missile’s… And how they basically make all naval platforms obsolete. Will it take a massacre of our forces before we “get it“…?

“Unlike Harpoon, LRASM fits in both the Mk. 41 vertical launch system silos of the Ticonderoga-class cruisers and Burke destroyers and the Mk. 57 silos on the new Zumwalt-class destroyers. This will allow individual ships to carry many more anti-ship missiles than ever before, although this will impact the number of other missiles, such as the SM-6 surface-to-air missile and ASROC anti-submarine rockets, in the ship’s overall inventory.

After decades of rapid innovation, the end of the Cold War and the subsequent Global War on Terror all but halted anti-ship missile development in the West. A focus on land operations in the Middle East and Central Asia sent Western navies struggling for relevance.

More at link:

1 posted on 06/05/2019 11:00:21 AM PDT by RevelationDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

“...Will it take a massacre of our forces before we “get it“…?...”

Traditionally, yes.


2 posted on 06/05/2019 11:05:34 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

Well it’s not like we didn’t know this was coming.
I have been saying for years that it was foolish to decommission our small oceanic bases.

We need to reestablish Wake, Midway, Johnson Atoll, Adak, and all of those others.

As a plus, they would be the perfect place to house every asylum applicant.


3 posted on 06/05/2019 11:05:52 AM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

Not to mention these ship killers can be launched from just about any vessel afloat.


4 posted on 06/05/2019 11:07:12 AM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

I wouldn’t say the age of big battleships is over.

Warfare is a series of ‘attack’ and “counter attack”

Better guns were countered by better armour.

In this case, detection of attack will eventually be countered with defense. Probably like reactive armour in tanks. Think of depth charges launched and will explode via proximity charges that ring around the capital ship.
Or some technology only the wiz kids are dreaming of in their labs..

Time will tell..


5 posted on 06/05/2019 11:10:17 AM PDT by RedMonqey (Welcome to Thunderdome... America 2019)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

I just hope that we have such missiles also.


6 posted on 06/05/2019 11:10:55 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

I remember being surprised when the Argentines launched an exocet missile and destroyed a British Frigate.

I think I read that they only had a handful of them or it would have been rough.


7 posted on 06/05/2019 11:11:43 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

3000 folks massacred on 9/11/2001 did not make us any wiser.


8 posted on 06/05/2019 11:15:00 AM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

It’s a quibble, but — Does the headline writer realize that no one actually has a battleship?


9 posted on 06/05/2019 11:18:25 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

> Not to mention these ship killers can be launched from just about any vessel afloat. <

That’s one thing that concerns me. Iran, or North Korea, or China could put one of those things on a tramp freighter, along with a trained crew.

Could that freighter get close enough to a carrier battle group to get off a decent shot?


10 posted on 06/05/2019 11:18:37 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid
Bah - that's what that nutcase Billy Mitchell said about battleships being sunk by bombers. Like that could ever happen.

(Uh, wait a minute - where'd all the battleships go?)

11 posted on 06/05/2019 11:21:24 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

Things like this are the game changers that win wars against much superior forces.

If a nation devises a battle plan based on something that can be eliminated, it can be in a serious world of hurt in short order.


12 posted on 06/05/2019 11:22:33 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Can I get a shout out for the person(s) who donated $2,000.00 from France? Thanks so much! Wow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

Our military may know more than we think they know. They may even have more defenses than we think they have. It’s not like they post in the NYT every month what our full capabilities are.


13 posted on 06/05/2019 11:22:44 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

The military has been testing this for over 10 years with B1’s from Dyess AFB, TX. These things can be launched at 20K feet and can hit a target the size of a football over 200 miles down range. They have already converted them to F-18’s and F-22’s besides the B1’s.

rwood


14 posted on 06/05/2019 11:22:48 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
3000 folks massacred on 9/11/2001 did not make us any wiser.

No kidding. Our slogan "never forget" was forgotten not long after jorge busho assured us iSlime was a religion of peace.

Now the mooseSlimes are our best buds and occupy Minnesota.

15 posted on 06/05/2019 11:23:02 AM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

Cue China, they are way ahead of us on this.


16 posted on 06/05/2019 11:25:29 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

It’s also a concern in the Hormuz Straits, with little room to maneuver. Portable anti-ship missile on shore could do some serious damage.


17 posted on 06/05/2019 11:26:17 AM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid
Will it take a massacre of our forces before we “get it“…?

Use against our ships by a major power would trigger a nuclear war. By any other country, massive retaliation that would virtually eliminate the perpetrator.

18 posted on 06/05/2019 11:26:38 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid
I would trust the Military brain trust over this story writter.
19 posted on 06/05/2019 11:30:44 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RevelationDavid

“And how they basically make all naval platforms obsolete.”

Nonsense.

Utter nonsense.

The Pacific is over 7,000 miles wide. The Atlantic over 4,000.

Even the longest reaching missiles are 500 miles.

That’s a bunch of water out there and for anyone to suggest it makes naval platforms, even just SURFACE platforms, obsolete shows they do not know what they are talking about.

And it does not even account for defensive systems.


20 posted on 06/05/2019 11:31:44 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson