Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Loophole in law granting illegal immigrants driver’s licenses could lead to voter fraud
New York Post ^ | 06/18/19 | By Bernadette Hogan, Nolan Hicks and Max Jaeger

Posted on 06/19/2019 5:16:36 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

A loophole in the new law granting driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants could allow hundreds of thousands of people to fraudulently register to vote in New York, according to critics, the state Board of Elections and the bill’s own sponsor.

The Green Light Bill, which passed the Senate 33-29 Monday and was signed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, allows illegal immigrants to obtain “standard” state driver’s licenses that can be used for identification and to board domestic flights.

But it is also the sole document required to register to vote, according to officials.

Even legislative sponsor Luis Sepúlveda (D-Bronx) admitted the provision could be abused.

“Theoretically, they could have the ability to vote,” he said while arguing for the bill during a Monday hearing in Albany.

Voters need only provide a driver’s license number to register to vote, according to BOE spokesman John Conklin.

“If you have a driver’s license number, you basically stop there,” Conklin told The Post Tuesday of the vetting process.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: akadeblasio; aliens; andrewcuomo; bernadettehogan; billdeblasio; bronx; democrats; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; hofstra; illegals; johnconklin; luis; luissepulveda; maxjaeger; mediawingofthednc; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkpost; nolanhicks; ocasiocortez; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; seplveda; smearmachine; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines

“Loophole in law granting illegal immigrants driver’s licenses could lead to voter fraud”

“could”? It’s designed for that!


61 posted on 06/19/2019 6:35:13 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
But it is also the sole document required to register to vote, according to officials.

The money line - INTENTIONAL VOTER FRAUD - just as everyone knows.

62 posted on 06/19/2019 6:35:35 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Voter fraud is a problem.
But the Democraps’ heinous vote harvesting (mfg votes) is particularly troublesome b/c it happens mostly in secret
AFTER the electon is over......and is used to flip seats already won by Republicans.

Pres Trump talking about a “rigged” election and warning about what he says will be voter fraud, there have been significant discussions about “poll watchers,” and concerns that certain individuals may try to intimidate their fellow voters. But there are rules governing polling places and poll watchers.

As it turns out, the US Constitution gives states the power to regulate the “time, place, and manner” of elections — which means, in practical terms, that most of the rules governing voting and polling places are made at the state level — and can therefore vary widely from one jurisdiction to the next.

Indeed, questions like whether you need a photo ID to vote, whether it’s legal to take a “ballot selfie,” or whether you can wear campaign paraphernalia into the voting booth don’t currently have national answers, but instead depend upon each state’s widely varying rules.

So if vote harvesters operate in places like nursing homes, hospitals, private homes, jails, and other secluded places, They operate without oversoght.

Means they could be in violation of US Constitution and the power to regulate the “time, place, and manner” of elections.

Discrimnation against Republican voters also looms .....when the harvesters flip Republican seats only.


63 posted on 06/19/2019 6:37:00 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

What? What are you saying? This just can’t be? I don’t believe it!

Buh, bye America.


64 posted on 06/19/2019 6:37:21 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (Welcome to North Mexico, Gringo's it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
"They can add all the illegal voters they want in New York and California. Won’t change a thing in electoral votes."

The number of electoral votes for a state is based on population.

Population also impacts the number of representatives a state has in the house.

65 posted on 06/19/2019 6:41:38 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Thanks, Liz.

Dear FR elections expert, wherever you are...

Just yesterday, we ran into a voting issue here in Georgia.

My wife changed her legal name two years ago and has voted a couple times using that new name.

But now we get a letter in the mail from Georgia addressed to her old name. And the purpose of the letter was to strongly encourage her old name to vote. And the letter said, they are going to follow-up in a few months.

My question is: how can she respond in a way that guarantees this no-longer-valid name isn’t used by someone tampering with ballots?

Should we simply return the mail saying the name no longer is valid, or is there other action I can take to better ensure the name is not abused in the future?

Thanks.


66 posted on 06/19/2019 6:44:32 AM PDT by poconopundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

And the GOP is asleep at the switch the whole time


67 posted on 06/19/2019 6:48:27 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I remember when I was young we would hear about the elections in the Soviet Union. The Premier of the Soviet Union would always win with 99.9% of the vote. That’s exactly where we are headed with these democrats who hate the US.


68 posted on 06/19/2019 6:54:11 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

His son is ready to take over


69 posted on 06/19/2019 6:55:08 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

No birth certificate is required. If one cannot read and speak English then you should not be allowed to vote. The ability to do so is a requirement for citizenship, so the screening at the polling place would be very quick and very accurate. No ticklie—no laundry.


70 posted on 06/19/2019 6:55:21 AM PDT by Saltmeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Saltmeat

Given that NY and other states require proper ID to get a driver’s license (usually several separate ID’s like a SS card and passport assigned points etc.) how can illegals even qualify based on the points system? This is another direct assault on Americans in favor of illegals.


71 posted on 06/19/2019 6:58:03 AM PDT by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss; Travis McGee
So, here are two simple questions that should help support an elementary logic test for anyone interested in evaluating the efforts Trump is undertaking to actually re-capture the USA:

1. Do you believe the deep state can be defeated via purely legal means? and
2. Do you believe large scale deportations and expulsions of illegal aliens can be achieved without civil unrest?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that a majority of FR participants would conclude a definite negative to both. Now, since we achieved that step, let's go ahead and determine whether Trump has come to the same conclusion. Pretty obvious, right?

OK, so here's my question, the elephant that (isn't) in the room, the dog that didn't bark: where are the preparations to deal with such eventualities? Where are the communications from Trump et al similar to the speeches and announcements made by FDR & Churchill - to their respective audiences - during WWII? Oh, our current situation doesn't represent a similar existential threat? OK

If you step back and look around, it's pretty glaringly obvious that no preparations are being made, whether it's a call to the militia, suggestions as to a hard fight ahead that might require stocking & supplies, the need for discipline and dedication to a difficult cause, etc.

Nope, all we get are personalized drama intentionally designed and manipulated to elicit electoral support for Trump. But, what's the point of supporting Trump if it's only about satisfying his own ego? Sure, we put off the future for another 4 years, but what then? There is still a looming showdown where accounts are finally going to be tallied and called in; why isn't there a call to the nation to begin such preparations?

72 posted on 06/19/2019 7:01:35 AM PDT by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag

Yep - I didn’t even need to see this, it was obvious this was the real intent.

No surprise at all.


73 posted on 06/19/2019 7:03:33 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Yes. Like they are on many issues. It is infuriating.


74 posted on 06/19/2019 7:06:30 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

Representation is supposed to be based on CITIZEN population. Having a DL doesn’t change that. A citizenship question on the census does.

But I get its just another way around voting laws. And as one poster stated, its a magnet for illegals getting social/welfare programs.


75 posted on 06/19/2019 7:10:01 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

And the effort to replace US voters with foreigners is not new. What’s new is that Dems are not even trying to hide it.


76 posted on 06/19/2019 7:11:14 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag
That’s NOT a loophole, it’s intentional.

Yes and they don't care who they kill on our highways or homes to get that illegal vote either.

I want them to try and tell me that Democrats are the ones that care.
77 posted on 06/19/2019 7:25:09 AM PDT by ssfromla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

Its about the electorial college.

They want the popular vote to be as lopsided as possible.

This will help them do away with the EC and when its gone they will never lose another election.

They may also pick up a few extra congressional seats like they did in CA.


78 posted on 06/19/2019 7:25:17 AM PDT by crusher2013
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

The clear intention of the new law. They have been driving anyway.


79 posted on 06/19/2019 7:29:08 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

>>>and to board domestic flights<<<

Do these Illegal Invader Licenses qualify as the new “Real ID” just like a Passport?


80 posted on 06/19/2019 7:32:36 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson