Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let’s Call The Liberals’ Second Amendment Militia Bluff
Townhall.com ^ | July 11, 2019 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 07/11/2019 2:56:23 AM PDT by Kaslin

The Second Amendment is so clear and simple that only liberals, aided by a half-wit liberal law school professor-tariat that is to real lawyering as Jerry Nadler is to Chippendales, could pretend to be confused about its meaning with a straight face.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The whole “shall not be infringed” part is a real problem for the left, since collectivist Castro-channelers prefer that we Americans be defenseless serfs existing at the government’s (i.e., their) mercy when we should be armed, freedom-loving citizens with the personal firepower to veto their pinko utopian schemes. So, they fixate on the 2A’s passing reference to the militia, spinning a prefatory statement that recognizes that a militia is a good thing into a directive to cancel out the whole “citizens having guns” part of the Second Amendment.

In other words, to defeat its very purpose.

It’s a silly interpretation, and one that’s not even remotely asserted in good faith, but why not put aside all the constitutional arguments supporting our right to pack heat and just call their militia bluff? Maybe we should reinvigorate the concept of a militia in our great nation, if only to annoy liberals.

So, pick up your weapon and fall in. Let’s do this thing. America, let’s get our militia on.

What is the “militia” anyway? It’s not goofy dudes in camo playing army. It’s the American people. It was those farmers, blacksmiths and other assorted non-hipsters who the Brits tried to disarm and who got all shooty in response. Today, it’s us, you and me, regular citizens with military arms so they can cap criminals and tyrants like bosses just as Nature intended.

That “well-regulated” part is what the Second Amendment Truthers focus on, but their analysis here (as with everything) is all wrong. They think Congress can well-regulate the militia into oblivion, presuming to misuse the clause to regulate away any right of actual citizens to have firearms with the ultimate goal of a militia that can’t be militant. That violates the longstanding principle that you do not interpret Constitutional provisions in such a way as to negate them, but liberals hate the Bill of Rights so what do you expect?

Just for fun, let’s assume Congress can regulate the militia instead of the individual states outside of the situations set forth in Article 1, section 8, clause 15 (“To provide for the calling of the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions."). If so, then Congress has already clearly chosen to regulate the militia by not really regulating it much at all. It has left it to us citizens to prepare ourselves for armed service, primarily by privately owning guns. And many of us are doing our duty, but tragically, there are millions of Americans who lack the effective modern weapons they need. This must change.

You see, that militia reference, when read as the liberals wish to read it, means Congress can regulate the militia to be more than it is now. You libs are always talking about the militia, so fine. Let’s make the militia a thing again.

First, we need to start by re-well-regulating the militia’s exact composition. United States Code Title 10, § 246 defines the “militia” as follows: “The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.” Clearly, this definition is far too restrictive for 2019, as well as sexist and cis-normative. The modern militia should consist of all healthy, law-abiding American citizens (and those intending to become American citizens) between 17 and, say, 65. After all, back in the olden days, if you made it to 35 you were pretty crusty, practically Joe Biden-like. 

Everybody. Basically, if you aren’t nuts, incapacitated, a crook or as old as a leading Democrat candidate, you’re in the militia. And that’s good, because a republic requires participation. For too long, we’ve outsourced the vital duties of individual citizens to our great first responders and organized military. No more. Time to step up, people.

You’re in the Army now, sort of. We all are.

Now, the militia is not the National Guard, which I’m a bit familiar with after serving in it for 23 years. People who know nothing often claim it is, but that’s silly. Review 10 USC § 246 above. The combined Army and Air Force Guard membership in 2019 is about 442,000 personnel. That’s about .001% of the ~329,000,000 million Americans, not even close to even the limited Section 246 membership. Moreover, the Guard is an organized reserve component of the United States that operates under state control except when mobilized – as an officer, I held both a federal commission and a state commission from California. My uniform read “U.S. ARMY.” I had the same training as active officer – in fact, like most of us, I spent years on active duty. We had guns (the same as the active Army’s) locked away in centralized locations. To join, you had to meet active Army or Air Force standards. It’s an awesome and vital force, but it is not a militia.

The idea of the militia is that it includes (almost) everybody, but everybody can’t join the military – only a fraction of our citizens can. The militia is different. It is about all of us doing our part personally for our nation, like answering a jury summons or paying taxes. Hey citizens, time to do your duty. Time to get well-regulated. And that starts with owning a weapon.

What kind of weapon? Well, the requirement for every citizen should be a firearm suited to combat – an actual assault rifle. The M16/M4 is the classic American military weapon, and every member of the militia should have one or an appropriate analogue. If you want to go with a 7.62 mm battle rifle instead of a 5.56 mm, that’s your prerogative. As a member of the modern militia, you’ll need to provide your own kit, and Kit Item No. 1 is some kind of rifle. You need to be able to defend yourself, your family, your community and your Constitution, whether with an AR, AK, FAL, SIG, HK or some other high-velocity acronym.

Oh, you need to have a pistol too. Supplementary shotguns are optional but encouraged.

Training? We won’t need a huge amount, other than requiring citizens to maintain proficiency on their firearms. Every citizen can show up for a month at 18 years old and take a break from dope smoking and their crappy Taylor Swift music to learn some basics, including safe weapons-handling procedures. Also, it would be a good time to do some basic lifesaving first aid training – stop the bleeding, treating shock, CPR. That’s not just vital for when the lead flies– what if you come on a car wreck and a fellow citizen has face-dived through the windshield and is spurting from an artery? What do you do? Oh yeah, my militia training!

If it saves one life, right?

Once initial training is done, then citizens can be assigned to local militia units with an annual muster. Everyone gathers with their basic equipment, updates contact info, touches base with the leadership, and then goes home after a BBQ to regular life until being called up. Don’t think they could never be called up either – I spent three weeks with the Army on the streets of Los Angeles during the 1992 riots and another week after the 1994 Northridge earthquake. LA is shaking as we speak; we citizens need to be ready. How long is there going to be nonsense going down if everyone on the street is carrying a rifle? Not long.

It’s not too much to ask citizens to take personal responsibility for their own country, and the ultimate responsibility is to defend it. That’s why the Second Amendment’s militia reference, taken seriously, means not stripping Americans of their ability to defend their freedom but enhancing it.

After all, for the security of a free state, it’s necessary that every healthy, law-abiding American citizen owns a real combat rifle and is ready to deploy on a moment’s notice to protect our people and our Constitution.

The Second Amendment prevents the kind of nightmarish leftist hellscape that I describe in my action-packed yet highly amusing novels about the United States’ split into red and blue countries, People's Republic, Indian Country and Wildfire. Hated by liberals and hailed by the sad Loser Boat crew from the failed Weekly Standard as “Appalling,” your right to be entertained shall not be infringed!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; kurtschlichter; militia; schlichter; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Kaslin

Nice post.. I was thinking of this during my Bible Study. My suggestion: any militia activity needs to be done the old fashioned way.. no google, no email. Keep it off the grid, well organized.
The NICS data and one local gunshop owner have confirmed: the dramatic increase in first time firearms are moslty libs.
Let us return to the footsteps of founders, of true freedom and equality.
Prepare yourselves for your prison ministry. Prepare your children with truth. Read the Prison Epistles.


21 posted on 07/11/2019 5:39:14 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Do you know anyone who isnÂ’t a socialist after 65? Freedom exchanged cash, a medicare card control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A simple substitution: “A well-schooled electorate, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and read Books, shall not be infringed.”

Accepting the leftist arguments regarding wording, clearly they believe ONLY the well-educated are permitted to read books.

22 posted on 07/11/2019 5:46:35 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So, pick up your weapon and fall in. Let’s do this thing. America, let’s get our militia on.”

You dont pick up a gun to annoy liberals. Guns are DEAD SERIOUS business. That aside the author needs to learn what the term ‘well regulated’ meant to the founding fathers.


23 posted on 07/11/2019 5:49:36 AM PDT by TalBlack (Damn right I'll "do something" you fat, balding son of a bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My only issue with this article is the upper age limit of the militia...65.

At 2, with 32+ years of military service, I damned sure wish to be considered part of the militia!


24 posted on 07/11/2019 5:58:03 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (We live on a tax farm as free-range humans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

The is “72”, not “2”! Damned Brydge keyboard has a flakey “7” key!


25 posted on 07/11/2019 6:00:10 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (We live on a tax farm as free-range humans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CopperTop

Here’s a quote from my profile page that I scarfed from some FReeper long ago:

The term “regulated” applied to clocks means “accurate in keeping time”. It made sense, particularly in 18th Century armies, to pay a lot of attention to how well soldiers could operate in massed formations. Soldiers had to be drilled to load, aim, and fire as one unit. You do NOT want the rifle next to you to be firing (and emitting a shower of sparks) while you are pouring gunpowder into your musket. Everybody had to do every step together with no screw ups.


26 posted on 07/11/2019 6:07:36 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

All this talk about militias is well and good, but the last time I checked the 2nd didn’t say the militia has the right to keep and bear arms. It says the PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms. Since I’m one of the people I’m pretty sure that includes me.


27 posted on 07/11/2019 6:17:50 AM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BDParrish
So “we’ll regulated” means we’ll equipped.

According to the Founders, it means well trained. That term in those days was also applied to a "well regulated clock", which is a clock that keeps time accurately.

28 posted on 07/11/2019 6:24:04 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They tried this back in the 80’s with the Michigan Militia and the news media completely vilified them with hit pieces and painted them as gun toting right wing extremists hick rednecks.

With today’s social media and the loss of credibility of the news media it may work now.


29 posted on 07/11/2019 6:24:13 AM PDT by BobinIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

There you go blaming it on the flakey 7 key.Where does it all end. lol


30 posted on 07/11/2019 7:01:57 AM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

After all, back in the olden days, if you made it to 35 you were pretty crusty, practically Joe Biden-like.


A common misconception. You weren’t ‘crusty’ at 35 in the olden days. You were 35 just like now (perhaps with poorer teeth). The life expectancy was lower because so many children died before the age of 5. That and lots of young women died from complications involved with childbirth.


31 posted on 07/11/2019 8:10:45 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack; Kaslin; Little Pig

https://johnsonsdictionaryonline.com/adjustment/

circa 1755

To Régulate. v.a. [regula, Lat.]
To adjust by rule or method.
“Nature, in the production of things, always designs them to partake of certain, regulated, established essences, which are to be the models of all things to be produced: this, in that crude sense, would need some better explication.” Locke.

To direct.
“Regulate the patient in his manner of living.” Wiseman.
“Ev’n goddesses are women; and no wife
Has pow’r to regulate her husband’s life.” Dryden.

20 year infantry reserve officer here. Modern terminology would be well trained and equipped to fit and work together with other similar bodies.

The Founders would have been most familiar with its usage as in the Locke quote. His usage would seem to mean a more natural evolution of something working well for its purpose.

In the pre-industrial age regulated was most often used in the hand fitting of a complex machine to be “timed” appropriated....”timed” coming into usage for the master’s hand fitting and regulating clocks, chronometers, and later watches.


32 posted on 07/11/2019 8:15:16 AM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

“You do NOT want the rifle next to you to be firing (and emitting a shower of sparks) while you are pouring gunpowder into your musket.”

A powerful, concise assertion of an obvious truth at the time, now long lost.

Salute!


33 posted on 07/11/2019 8:17:49 AM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

You probably didn’t, but don’t miss my #26. We’re on the same page.


34 posted on 07/11/2019 8:25:41 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
In my not so humble opinion, the devolution of our Republic into that most despotic of governments, a "democracy" is a direct consequence of the abandonment of the entire concept of the militia.

I would really like to see the militia revived. As mentioned in the article, the 1992 riots in LA would have been an appropriate use of militia personnel. More common, would be in post-hurricane environments. If you're a HAM guy, you'll most likely be aware that FEMA and other government agencies make use of civilian HAM operators when standard communications links are down, such as the environment that is often prevalent when a hurricane wipes out cell towers and such. Emergency exercises are held every year during the summer months, and HAMs are an integral part of this. I would say that these folk are the last remaining rump of the militia that previously existed, and would be a great place to start. If we started looking at it as actual militia service, it would probably do a great deal towards expanding our pool of radio operators.

Unofficial organizations like the 'Cajun Navy' would be a part of this as well, and it would be great to have some small degree of official recognition to groups that are interested in being a part of the solution of local civil defense. I think that offloading our civic responsibilities to a professional military and 'first responders' (who are actually 2nd responders - the people themselves are always there first) is a bad thing that we should not encourage. Rather, we should encourage the American ideal of personal responsibility, accountability, and civic involvement.

35 posted on 07/11/2019 8:55:08 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BDParrish
Latin teacher here and I can explain. Rule here means the standard expected by regular troops. The problem with militia is that they show up poorly equipped with antique and sub standard weapons. See the use of standard there? Like the “regulars” the militia needs modern weapons. So “we’ll regulated” means we’ll equipped.

Just so. Also back in the day the term 'regulated' when applied to clocks, meant that it was well adjusted, and accurate in its workings.

36 posted on 07/11/2019 9:00:02 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Constitution says Congress should be arming the militia:

A1S8

...To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;...

O’Bummer handed out phones, Trump should hand out guns.


37 posted on 07/11/2019 2:53:28 PM PDT by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Great article, and I love that he sets the record straight on the nonsensical idea that the modern National Guard is “the militia.” I’ve been thinking for years that a revival of the militia is just what we need.

I think it could catch on more than many think. Look at the popularity of CrossFit, mud runs, MMA training, outdoor and survival gear, etc. I think a lot of people are asking for something like this in their lives without even realizing it.


38 posted on 07/12/2019 6:13:50 AM PDT by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

Agreed,
I’ve got radios
and lots of camping gear.
Of course if SHTF
I’m a Target.


39 posted on 07/12/2019 8:01:43 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (Despised by the Despicable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BDParrish; FreedomPoster

Thanks for the clarifications, folks! d;^)


40 posted on 07/14/2019 5:38:10 AM PDT by CopperTop (Outside the wire it's just us chickens. Dig?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson