Article image.
Posted on 07/31/2019 8:23:36 AM PDT by fishtank
If Diet and Drug Science Is Uncertain, How About Evolution?
July 29, 2019 | Jerry Bergman
Darwinists Proclaim Molecules-to-Man Evolution is a Proven Fact—
But scientists are not sure about the best diet and the efficacy of new drugs!
by Dr Jerry Bergman
Evolutionists are so confident that molecules-to-man evolution is true that court decisions have contentedly ruled that, because this view is consensus science and unequivocally true, it must be taught as fact. As a result, academic institutions think that both teachers and professors can be justly terminated if they do not teach it as fact.
(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...
"A new study published in the world’s premier medical journal, The British Medical Journal, did just that. Although the study was done in Germany, it covers drugs commonly available in most developed nations. The study, directed by Professor Beate Wieseler, head of the department of drug assessment, concluded that “More than half of new drugs entering the German healthcare system have not been shown to add benefit.”[9] They add that
"research covering drug approvals since the 1970s suggests only a limited number of new drugs provide real advances over existing drugs. Most studies put the proportion of true innovation at under 15%, with no clear improvement over time.[10]""
Article image.
From the article:
“How Certain Is Dietary Science?
Surely, dietary science is more certain.
What food proportions we should consume is based on evidence from the close to one million peer-reviewed papers published in the nutrition science field.
Actually, according to the cover story in New Scientist (which I received the same day I learned about the study in the British Medical Journal ) was “Why Everything You Know About Nutrition is Wrong.”
Clare Wilson shocked readers with the blunt statement, “almost all nutritional science is fatally flawed.”[13]”
Bergman’s book about Darwin is an eye-opener.
Article image and caption.
If you have the guts,
then question Darwinism.
Dear Mr. Shtank,
No thanks.
If man evolves to meet the demands his environment foists upon him, how did we grow a brain that we only partially use ?
Darwin is one of the most evil humans to ever walk the earth and has caused irreparable harm to cultures.
Darwin and MooHamMud are messengers of satan.
Is diet and drugs even a science?
Maybe second to Rachel Carson (And her evil progeny EPA).
Every ten years, we find out what they were saying for the last decade about nutrition was flawed.
One decade, salt is the devil, the next, it’s trans fats, now it’s refined sugars, and in a year or two, it will be something else.
I figure my gut knows what it wants me to put in it, so I just listen to my gut, nutritionists be damned.
“how did we grow a brain that we only partially use”
That old “we only use 10% of our brain” line is actually a myth.
The science is settled... when it furthers a leftist agenda.
Evolution has always been more important for its presuppositions and implications than its ostensible validity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.