Support Free Republic Folks, Donate Today!
Posted on 08/05/2019 2:46:31 PM PDT by jazusamo
No offense to outnumbered conservative Californians, but...California is the lost cause state. I guess New York is in that category as well.
When our side makes laws aimed at Democrat misbehavior, they go to a court and get it quashed usually by the end of the same day the law is passed, end of story.
Off the Wall Ping!
Contact to be added.
I’ll call you one bill of Attainder and and raise you one ipso facto law.
When does the shooting start?
5.56mm
Love them
Requiring some sort of birth record would actually facilitate ascertaining constitutional “requirements” (scare quotes, because no “requirement” in the constitution is actually required) of age and birth citizenship. There is nothing controversial about demanding that as a condition of appearing on the ballot. Heck, I have to show proof of citizenship just to get certain state and federal ID papers.
I like the health records one.
If CA gets away with this, TX should require health records. The CA whore will have to disclose her Chlamydia or whatever other STDs she has or has had.
I like it, but I think it is the wrong approach.
President Trump should declare this an act of Secession and Declare Martial Law in California, and Appoint a Special Master, preferably a General or Admiral to handle the affairs of the new Territory. We used to HANG those convicted of Treason , see Lincoln.
To guarantee standing a Libertarian candidate (I am sure the Libertarian Party could have primaries in CA) should also file, on the basis that he is running on a personal privacy platform, and handing over tax records to the public would undermine his own morals.
Support Free Republic Folks, Donate Today!
Or Blockbuster rentals...
But I'm dating myself...
-PJ
None taken.
I'm only staying here right now due to familial obligations. Once those are fulfilled, I won't be able to get out of this state fast enough.
Unconstitutional on it’s face. States have no authority to define, add to, or take away from the Constitutional requirements for the office of President. This is not a State’s Rights or 10th Amendment issue as the Constitution clearly defines the requirements (thus the 10th does not apply)
I agree, even Guv Moonbeam knew it.
It’s hard to imagine that these whack job leaders in CA are so far gone they think this will stand.
Why only the president? Why not every state and federal official?
Man oh man, where would all of us be if it were not for Judaical Watch. They do yeomens work.
“No offense to outnumbered conservative Californians, but...California is the lost cause state.”
Well, I take direct offense to your comment! I guess we can be thankful that “cut and run” RINOs like you weren’t around in 1776, because it’s clear from your comments that you wouldn’t have fought. I get really tired of ding dongs like you who see the “solution” to the problem of creeping Socialism, being to move to where it hasn’t arrived in sufficient amounts to cause a near-term problem. There was an old song “Yellow Stain Blues.” You might want to read the lyrics.
Heard this mentioned once, would like to hear from someone more learned on Constitutional issues than I - would this not amount to a Bill Of Attainder?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.