Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K

1) If he said “nuke” I doubt he really meant “nuke”.
2) If this conversation took place, like others said, it sounds more like just sounding off ideas to prevent hurricanes from harming people and cities
3) We have some technologies such as seeding clouds for rain. Dunno how well any of that works
4) I am no expert but I doubt even a “really big bomb” would work. Hurricanes stretch something like 300 miles wide. A nuke might work but sounds absurd. Perhaps a large number of large bombs could break the storms up in the atmosphere? I dunno.
5) How about other technologies such as frequency waves to disrupt the formation of hurricanes?
6) All ideas are worth thinking through. Most of them will have unintended consequences I would imagine. I don’t think anyone would want to test nuclear explosions.


23 posted on 08/25/2019 4:46:05 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: monkeyshine

A nuke might have a better chance of knocking out a tornado. Oh yeh, and a whole lot of other things with it too.
But if there could be a targeted, non radioactive explosion to blow off the top of the tornado to disrupt the rotation what a benefit that would be.


30 posted on 08/25/2019 4:53:22 PM PDT by tflabo (Prince of Peace, Lion of Righteousness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson