[WaterWeWaitinFor]

IS SHE THE VERY BEST or WHAT?

She’s been on top of this whole mess for 3 years.

[JoSixChip]

Uh-O, there goes whistle blower protection.

[John 3_19-21]

Why should he? Laws and rules are for rubes and republicans. Or so says our nation’s media.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

Is this “whistle blower” married to Christine Balsy-Ford?

[RoseofTexas]

Oooopppsssiie....😊

[Enlightened1]

It’s a CIA coup. Obama hold overs.

Most likely Brennan and Schiiff slap this thing together to remove President Trump

[Robert357]

I guess someone using hearsay evidence needs to file a whistleblower complaint on the whistleblower. Anyone at NSA been monitoring this guys phones or better yet know a guy that does?

[1Old Pro]

Clearly Shifty needs to recuse himself.

[ETCM]

Headline is wrong. "Whistleblower" was the one who didn't disclose...

If "whistleblower" worked with EXTREMELY partisan interests, whose goal is to remove the President, to shape and develop the complaint prior to submission to the IG, then the complaint is illegitimate!

The only option for the IG should be to withdraw the complaint.

[blu]

Sorry, but maybe you can get a mod to fix your headline? The double did nots cancel each other out and confuse me. You are lucky it’s Friday afternoon, any other day and I’d be GRAMMAR TRIGGERED! LOL!

[Robert DeLong]

For those like me who do not know, because we do not listen to Fox:

Catherine Herridge is Chief Intelligence correspondent for the Fox News Channel.

[SeekAndFind]

Why stop at two “did nots”?

And oh yeah, I love that he spelled Adam’s family correctly :)

[gcparent]

What’s it mean????? No knowledge of contact or no knowledge of allegation????

[Kevin in California]

Catherine Herridge is what you would call a real journalist doing her job.

Other real journalists I can think of are Sharyl Atkisson, Sarah Carter, Laura Loomer, John Solomon, etc.

[edwinland]

My suggestion for tomorrow’s NY POst front page headline:

WHISTLEBLOWER BLOWS IT

[Wuli]

So, the “whistle blower” was in affect decieving the IG, because the “whistle blower” law requires the “whistle blower” to NOT speak directly to Congress before their claim is filed and reviewed (if they want the “whistle blower” protections of that law).

But since he - the “whsitle blower” defied the law, he should be fired, BECAUSE he defied the law, and in affect demonstarted he was a political operative, not a “whistle blower”.

Shiff should be removed from his committee postion altogether. He, not Trump, is an example of abuse of power and obstruction of justice.

[HollyB]

I don’t understand. So, the ‘leaker’ went to Schiff. Then went to the IG, but did not disclose he met with Schiff?

He lied, yes. But, what does this mean ? Thank you.

[Candor7]

No disclosure = Conspiracy to commit sedition and treason.

[mewzilla]

Don’t ask, don’t tell.

[Missouri gal]

So the whistleblower (spy, that is) loses his whistleblower protection, including his anonymity, because he lied on the form AND since the whole thing is made up garbage. However, the ICIG won't be the one to reveal spy's name, because he is definitely biased in favor of the coup attempt. We know that because he rubber stamped it “credible” without even asking to see a transcript or asking anybody who may have been party to the call about the call.
I hope to see charges against the spy, Schiff and the ICIG for starters. Pelosi and Schiff on ethics charges. After the 2020 election those two, if still in Congress by then, not in jail, should be removed by the new Republican majority.