Posted on 10/05/2019 4:04:23 AM PDT by cotton1706
Not at all part of her job but still did it.
Funny how it's ALWAYS ok for ANY Democrat administration official to help dig up dirt on ANY republican!
Just par for the course the media would say. And they all his their heads in unison.
But the Democrats insist this is a crime punishable by firing and disbarment from servicing the public forevermore.
Or is the crime being an American, not a Democrat?
According to her the greater part of those unmaskings were done by someone else using her identity.
When U.S. intelligence agencies gather information on foreigners, often the name of a U.S. citizen or entity will be collected. Under current U.S. law, information about innocent citizens gathered in this way is referred to as incidental collection. Their names and data must be masked to protect their privacy. Authorized government officials, under certain conditions, may unmask the identity of an individual. In October 2017, Powers testified before a closed session of the House Intelligence Committee. Then Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) spoke to Fox News Brett Baier afterward and said:
Her testimony is they [the unmasking requests] may be under my name, but I did not make those requests. I think if she were on your show, she would say those requests to unmask may have been attributed to her, but they greatly exceed by an exponential factor the requests she actually made So, thats her testimony, and she was pretty emphatic about it.
So, weve got to get to the bottom of that. If there is someone else making requests on behalf of a principal in the intelligence community, we need to know that because were getting ready to reauthorize a program thats really important to the country, but also has a masking component to it. When John Bolton served at the United Nations, he unmasked the identities of three individuals. In the year leading up to the 2016 presidential election, then-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Powers unmasked over 260 Americans.
On September 20, 2017, Fox News reported that the remarkable number of Americans who had been unmasked at Powers request was an attempt to uncover associates of President Trump. She was unmasking at such a rapid pace in the final months of the Obama administration that she averaged more than one request for every working day in... (Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
============================
(HAT TIP PIASA--Update: JW Sues for Unmasking Targeting Trump Team | Feb 16, 2018 |
Quoting Tom Fitton --- responding to a FOIA request, we were told by the NSC in May 2017 that the materials regarding the unmasking by Obama's National Security Advisor, Susan Rice (onetime UN Ambassador) of the identities of any U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team have been removed to the Obama Library.
This is right up there with the allegation theory that Susan Rice forged her UN successor, Samantha Powers,
name to authorize unmaskings. Obama and HRC ordered the unmasking, and Rice obediently forged the signatures.

Partners in crime......Obama, UN Amb Samantha Powers, Obama, NSC's Rice (Power's predecessor as UN Amb).
Good call
Iirc there was a rule change to intra agency sharing of data the last month of Obama. I didnt know why at the time and forgot about it.
According to her the greater part of those unmaskings were done by someone else using her identity.
“weve got to get to the bottom of that. If there is someone else making requests on behalf of a principal in the intelligence community, we need to know that because were getting ready to reauthorize a program thats really important to the country”
SO, did Gowdy get to the bottom of it? Or has this gone by the wayside?
SO, did Gowdy get to the bottom of it? Or has this gone by the wayside?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only thing Gowdy ever got to the bottom of was a jar of hair jel.
“The only thing Gowdy ever got to the bottom of was a jar of hair jel.”
Lol
Rice has one qualification for her job
Rice is Black
There is enough information and evidence out there now to turn things upside down. Why the wait? Let’s get the show on the road and let the chips fall where they may.
“Iirc there was a rule change to intra agency sharing of data the last month of Obama.”
That sounds like something Jamie (wall of seperation) Gorelick would have her hands all over. I’m a little surprised her name hasn’t turned up ...yet.
I can’t remember the details, just the shock over how the “sharing” of information across agencies was changed in December to make an impct on the incoming admin. I probably heard it on Jay Sekulow or Glenn Beck.
Partners in crime indeed they never expected the truth to come out after the failed rigged Hillary(hic) Clinton election.
It does the heart good to see real justice about to be served it gives faith in just how good our system works,the cons can only cover up things for so long before the ax falls.

All the dirt Hillary was expected to sweep under the rug, was now in the hands of the man Obama tried to destroy.
Indeed Trump keeps them awake all night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.