Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who is Paying for the Trade War with China?
EconPol ^ | Nov 2018 | Benedikt Zoller-Rydzek and Gabriel Felbermayr

Posted on 10/09/2019 5:36:36 AM PDT by BeauBo

The greatest share of the tariff burden falls not on American consumers or firms, but on Chinese exporters... a 25 percentage point increase in tariffs raises US consumer prices on all affected Chinese products by only 4.5% on average, while the producer price of Chinese firms declines by 20.5%. The US government has strategically levied import duties on goods with high import elasticities, which transfers a great share of the tariff burden on to Chinese exporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at econpol.eu ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: benediktzollerrydzek; boycotts; china; chinese; gabrielfelbermayr; sanctions; tariff; tariffs; trade
Note that this is a year old.

They presented a theoretical basis for why China would bear the brunt of the costs, and it has played out as they predicted. The bottom line is price elasticity - which depends on whether the buyer or the seller needs the sale more (but mostly on the buyer).

When the buyer really needs what they are buying, they will pay more if they have to - price is elastic.

This paper argued that the Trump Administration optimally selected the first $250 billion of products for tariffs, that were the most inelastic to price changes - so Chinese manufacturers would have to mostly (over 80%) absorb the cost. It has since worked out that way in practice.

According to their analysis, the tariffs on the rest of Chinese imports (more finished consumer goods), just starting to roll out, will increase consumer prices in the USA a bit more than the earlier ones (about a 6% rise, just on those tariffed products), but that China will still be paying the lion's share of those tariffs. Ultimately, the stuff we buy from China, is not really stuff that we absolutely have to buy from them, so we are just not willing to pay pay much more to buy it from them, vs. another producer.

So the net result is a significant overall benefit to the USA, just on the transaction. The longer term benefits of securing our supply chain, stimulating domestic production and starving aggressive communists of resources; are likely priceless.

1 posted on 10/09/2019 5:36:36 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

I was talking to some liberals about this last week. I told them that I expect to be impacted because I buy most of my stuff from Amazon. I told them that I expect some products to become more expensive, and others to simply disappear. and I’m willing to pay that price.


2 posted on 10/09/2019 5:40:33 AM PDT by cuban leaf (We're living in Dr. Zhivago but without the love triangle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

I’ve already seen the effects. I was actually going to buy a Harbor Freight nail gun, until I discovered that an American made tool at Home Depot was the same price.


3 posted on 10/09/2019 5:45:42 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Chivalry is not dead. It is a warriors code and only practiced by warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

I am really curious, what did they say?

Donald Trump really took this issue from Democrats. I am curious if they agree with you, or whether “if Donald Trump is for it, I’m against it” works on this issue as well.


4 posted on 10/09/2019 5:50:06 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
When Trump is done with 'em, the Forbidden City will be down to the Twobidden City. /rimshot

5 posted on 10/10/2019 12:37:55 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
...the Trump Administration optimally selected the first $250 billion of products for tariffs, that were the most inelastic to price changes - so Chinese manufacturers would have to mostly (over 80%) absorb the cost. It has since worked out that way in practice.

Layers of strategy - all pushing to Make American Great Again... absolutely brilliant...

6 posted on 10/10/2019 9:09:13 AM PDT by GOPJ (Change the name from "Deep State" to 'Corrupt Mindless Bureaucracies'...."CMB')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson