Congress set for showdown with Trump over Kurds

The Hill ^ | 10/09/19 06:11 PM EDT | JORDAIN CARNEY AND REBECCA KHEEL

[robowombat]

President Trump is barreling toward a showdown with Congress over his decision to pull back U.S. troops in northern Syria despite widespread opposition.

The announcement, which caught leadership and traditional GOP allies flatfooted, sparked a wave of condemnation, with Republicans calling it a “disaster in the making,” a “catastrophic mistake” and a “terrible decision.”

Lawmakers are already weighing how to respond to Trump’s decision, setting the stage for a high-profile clash with Trump as soon as Congress returns from a two-week break on Monday.

“Congress must and will act to limit the catastrophic impact of this decision,” said Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), a member of House GOP leadership, adding that Trump’s decision was having “sickening and predictable consequences.”

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) warned that unless Turkey changes its behavior “everything is on the table,” including “suspending arms sales, to suspending economic aid to even considering their status in NATO.”

Lawmakers, scattered across the country for a two-week break, are having behind-the-scenes talks about potential legislative action and publicly throwing out a myriad of ideas ranging from a resolution opposing Trump’s actions to sanctions against Turkey to inserting language into a mammoth defense policy bill.

“Multiple committees are looking at possible legislative efforts to put the House on record against the President’s outrageous decision,” a House Democratic leadership aide told The Hill.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y) separately predicted that “Congress will take some form of action” given the “broad condemnation” sparked by Trump’s decision.

Lawmakers are under growing pressure to mount a formal response after Turkey began airstrikes and shelling against Kurdish forces in northern Syria and, hours later, moved ground troops into the country after Trump pulled back U.S. troops. Lawmakers have warned for days that Trump’s decision could endanger the Kurds, who were integral to the U.S.-led fight against ISIS.

Trump on Wednesday tried to distance himself from Turkey’s actions, saying the United States “does not endorse this attack and has made it clear to Turkey that this operation is a bad idea.” But he also said the United States should not be part of “endless, senseless wars.”

Trump reiterated that the U.S. stance is that it is now Turkey’s responsibility to ensure ISIS prisoners being held by the Syrian Democratic Forces do not escape and further claimed Ankara has committed to “protecting civilians” and “ ensuring no humanitarian crisis takes place.”

That’s done little to stem the flow of criticism from Capitol Hill.

“I said that President Trump's decision to abandon the Kurds ... was terribly unwise. Today, we are seeing the consequences of that terrible decision. If the reports of Turkish strikes in Syria are accurate, I fear our allies the Kurds could be slaughtered,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine).

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) lamented the “tragic loss of life among friends shamefully betrayed.”

One option under discussion would be to slap new sanctions on Turkey for invading Syria.

Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said after Turkey’s actions that they have reached an agreement on sanctions legislation. The bill would target Turkey’s energy sector and military. It also includes visa restrictions for Turkish leadership, including President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and would sanction any assets they have within U.S. jurisdiction.

Wondering how others manage ulcerative colitis? SPONSORED CONTENT Wondering how others manage ulcerative colitis?

BY ABBVIE “I am pleased to have reached a bipartisan agreement with Senator Van Hollen on severe sanctions against Turkey for their invasion of Syria. While the Administration refuses to act against Turkey, I expect strong bipartisan support,” Graham said.

“Most Members of Congress believe it would be wrong to abandon the Kurds who have been strong allies against ISIS,” he added.

Van Hollen said the sanctions bill will be introduced next week and that they want a quick vote.

“Will ask for an immediate vote to send a clear message to Turkey that it must cease and desist its military action, withdraw its fighters from the areas under attack, and stop the tragic loss of life,” he said.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who has aligned herself closely with Trump, said on Wednesday that she will support new financial penalties.

“I condemn in the strongest possible terms any U.S. policy that will result in endangerment of the Kurds who have sacrificed so much blood and treasure alongside American forces. ... Turkey must pay the price for its aggression toward our Kurdish partners,” Blackburn said.

Trump downplayed the potential pushback, saying he thinks “it’s OK” if Congress imposes sanctions on Turkey even as he disagreed with Graham’s desire to stay in Syria and dismissed the Kurds because they “didn't help us in the Second World War.”

“I think Lindsey would like to stay there for the next 200 years and maybe add a couple a hundred of thousand people every place, but I disagree with Lindsey on that,” Trump told reporters at the White House. “But I will tell you that I do agree on sanctions, but I actually think much tougher than sanctions if [Erdogan] doesn’t do it in as humane a way as possible.”

Graham is also crafting a resolution formally opposing Trump’s decision, adding that he expects “it will receive strong bipartisan support.” A spokesman for Graham told The Hill this week that they were in the process of drafting the resolution.

It would mark the second time the Senate has rebuked Trump on Syria after providing veto-proof support for an amendment from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) warning the president against withdrawing troops from Syria or Afghanistan earlier this year.

McConnell sent a warning shot on Monday saying that “the conditions that produced that bipartisan vote still exist today.”

Lawmakers could also slip language into a mammoth defense bill, known as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). House and Senate lawmakers are negotiating on a final version of the legislation.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) called Turkey’s actions “unacceptable” and warned that Ankara will face “serious economic, diplomatic and security consequences.”

“Erdoğan’s actions risk undermining our bilateral relationship, destabilizing northeastern Syria, squandering hard-won progress against ISIS, creating a new humanitarian crisis and harming our Kurdish partners,” Inhofe said.

A spokeswoman for Inhofe said because “the NDAA is currently in the conference process” she “couldn’t speculate” on whether it will include a response to the Syria situation.

A House Armed Services Committee spokeswoman told The Hill that lawmakers, led by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), are working on legislation related to the issue separately from the NDAA, but could not immediately provide more detail. A House Foreign Affairs spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

More than 50 House Democrats, led by Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), sent a letter to Trump on Wednesday afternoon demanding he answer 10 questions about his Syria policy, including how the United States will ensure the Kurds’ protection and what Trump considers to be “off limits” for Turkey to do.

“This decision jeopardizes decades of trust in American solidarity and will only serve to undermine current and future alliances,” they wrote.

In the meantime, calls are mounting for the Trump administration to testify about the decision, providing a high-stakes setting where they would likely face a bipartisan grilling.

Romney and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) are urging Senate Foreign Relations Committee leadership to have administration officials testify before the panel and “explain to the American people how betraying an ally and ceding influence to terrorists and adversaries is not disastrous for our national security interests.”

Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, also called for Defense Secretary Mark Esper to testify before Congress “as soon as possible.”

“I would hope Secretary of State [Mike] Pompeo and Acting Director of National Intelligence [Joseph] Maguire will be called before the respective oversight committees as well,” Reed said.

“We need a full accounting and there is no time to waste. Congress must send a clear, bipartisan signal to this president that we do not condone his decision,” he added. “And it has to go beyond tweets and statements. We need action.”

[Right_in_Virginia]

I didn’t know a president/CIC required a declaration of peace from Congress before withdrawing from a war/non-war.

QFT

[lodi90]

The EU could stop Erdie. Why hasn’t it?

---

And NATO. I imagine Trump could convene some sort of emergency NATO meeting over this. Get your popcorn for that one.

[mewzilla]

US membership in NATO has outlived its usefulness.

[JonPreston]

Only two sides to pick from, you are either for ISIS or the Kurds

Hogwash, the third choice is supporting the American taxpayer and the Trump base, both of whom have had enough of the bloody Bush Doctrine.

[Right_in_Virginia]

The PKK. Have the neocons on this thread distinguished between the Kurdish factions, or are they all blinded by the bloodlust of General Lindsey Graham?

I vote for blinded.

[mewzilla]

Trump hasn’t done it because the EU/NATO wouldn’t be on board with what Trump wants to do.

Which should be another screaming five alarm warning to us about the real interests/goals of our so-called allies.

[nathanbedford]

I have thought for some time about this "Trump gotta be Trump” rationalization and I react several levels.

First on the intellectual level, I think it is ridiculous to believe that Trump needs to be needlessly coarse in order to be effective, indeed, they say he could not have achieved the presidency without the boorishness. I reject that.

On an emotional level, I get angry when his borderline language is distorted to attack him even as I intellectually know that he is setting himself up for just such an attack.

His imprecision of language, for example in the Charlottesville matter, left him vulnerable to just such scurrilous libels. He has to take some responsibility to his supporters for making their job harder by his looseness of language to come to his defense. His policies should win him 40 states but his imprecision of language whether witting, just a bad old habit, or a function of mild Tourette's will cost him a few. He will survive impeachment, but again, our job has been made harder.

[nathanbedford]

The EU could stop Erdie. Why hasn’t it?

I have no idea what you mean by this oft repeated question? I suspect it contains a false premise.

[chris37]

I support Trump.

I don’t support the GOP at all on anything.

[Alberta's Child]

Back in Democrat-controlled Senate was gearing up to pass a bipartisan Senate bill to authorize the U.S. military action in Syria — which had already been ongoing for more than two years at that point.

The measure went nowhere because polls were showing that 70% of Americans opposed the Syria campaign.

President Trump isn’t the one who walked into a trap here.

[csvset]

Lest we forget, it was the Deep State CIA that fomented the Syrian “civil war” . Coming off their *cough* “success” *cough* in Libya, (remember that “war” ?) Obama /Hillary/Deep State/CIA set their sights on Syria.

So, all the hand wringers that want to perpetuate the USA’s involvement in Syria, haven’t we done enough over there already ?

[ScottinVA]

Well said; I completely agree. I certainly understand and appreciate the need to extricate from needless wars, but the Kurds (especially the Peshmerga of Northern Iraq) have been our steadiest allies over there, and I don’t support actions that yank the rug from under them. I’m hoping there’s a contingency plan in place that hasn’t been made public that’ll forestall a disastrous result.

[Alberta's Child]

Sorry ... that’s back in 2013.

[The Toll]

I’m sure they will say many things. One thing they won’t say is “I am resigning and going to defend the Kurds with my own life”.

[trebb]

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) warned that unless Turkey changes its behavior “everything is on the table,” including “suspending arms sales, to suspending economic aid to even considering their status in NATO.”

Let's see the Congress actually deploy troops......what would happen if the Congress declared a war and the CINC didn't fight it?

[Mercat]

He’s the CIC and I trust him.

[Buckeye McFrog]

It seems BOTH parties are going to saw off the branch behind themselves over a war the majority did not want.

[unread]

"It’s not our job to partition lands."

Funny how the dimocraps love walls everywhere, but not to save our own country.. Go figure... :(

[Iscool]

Romney and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) are urging Senate Foreign Relations Committee leadership to have administration officials testify before the panel and “explain to the American people how betraying an ally and ceding influence to terrorists and adversaries is not disastrous for our national security interests.”

Bunk...If Congress wants a war, they can start a war...No one needs to testify about anything...Just more theater to turn the public against Trump...

[InterceptPoint]

No offense, but that’s idiotic.
+++++
Spot on. I agree with you 110%.