Posted on 10/24/2019 9:55:34 PM PDT by KingofZion
NYT highly profitable?
Lmao. Isnt that to the tune of journalists getting fired and Facebook sponsoring them?
Give me a break
Not at airports and doctor offices and hospital ER rooms.
Not in pizzerias, diners and bars.
Not in the living room, not in the dining room, not in the bedroom.
Not anywhere.
Why have we been feeding this rabid dog
Better late than never!
I have long suspected that the Washington Post gets the vast majority of its subscription revenue from federal agencies. I think some LARGE digital subscriptions will turn up, giving full access to the rag to all employees of a department or division.
In the world of trade magazines that focus mainly on a single company, that company often buys a “blanket” subscription that essentially funds the whole magazine. The Washington Post is the trade rag for the federal bureaucracy, and their behavior strongly suggests a similar financial arrangement.
If the administration sticks to their guns on this, I think it will finish off the Post.
Publish their budgets. I wanna see what else (of our hard-earned taxpayer monies) they’ve been wasting.
Excellent!!!!! Way to go President Trump!
LOL... I know you jest, but the few times I actually have watched Al-Jazeera, they're muzzy and weird but in all honesty a much better news operation than CNN.
Why not just tell the truth and say the decision is because the Times and the Post are fake news? Why lie about it?
Actually they are. Link
Profitable does not mean expanding and growing.
No, but increasing subscriptions does.
Another nice way of saying the print version is going away.
Which is true of just about every newspaper out there.
Excellent, who can argue with saving money?
Oh.....democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.