Posted on 12/02/2019 12:08:57 PM PST by conservative98
Google’s strategy is to push just enough that they hamstring conservatives as much as possible but not enough that everybody cuts and runs to an alternative platform and they lose all their influence.
________________________________________________
What alternative platform could we run to? Just recently Gab tried to upstart Fakebook. They failed.
I remember when YouTube first began. It was great. It was successful. It worked.
Then Google just bought the entire site. 1.65 Billion dollars. In 2006. Chump change.
“Do you actually need an ad to vote Trump? LOL”
True that. Google & Youtube will matter minutely. Trump’s Tweets, rallies, black outreach and Hispanic outreach are mattering much. As for white women - an unpredictable mess, that.
First order of business in 2020, BREAK GOOGLE UP
Trump should turn off their IP addresses.
But the report gives no specific reason why the ads were taken down or what company policy they violated.
**************************************************************************************
They were too effective and/or accurately refuted the DemRAT narratives.
This policy must only apply to conservatives. It seems that very other time that I play a music video on Youtube, I have to sit through a Bloomberg ad before it plays—and it’s always one of those short ones that you can’t skip.
Any reporters associated in ANY way, even if any of these companies are former employers, they should be banned from the WH.
Somehow we have to fight back. Our comments are just echo chambers.
What policy? The one they change every hour to suit their needs?
Google’s company policy:
Do Evil.
Stop Using their Browser Search engine. Use Duck Duck go.
Sue their a$$es off!
Election interference by Big Tech
Antitrust anyone?
Who thinks that Trump will have any access to any sort of internet or network advertising by next June? That will make a real difference in November if the only ads people hear and see are SocialDemocrat. And the banks will probably be pulling the plug on conservative organizations so that Republican money will have no place to be based. The Republicans do not seem to be concerned about this in the least, perhaps secretly applaud it.
I believe Federal election law requires companies to air ads for a Federal election. They aren't allowed to say "no." They aren't allowed to refuse to run ads approved by a candidate.
“I believe Federal election law requires companies to air ads for a Federal election. They aren’t allowed to say “no.” They aren’t allowed to refuse to run ads approved by a candidate. “
I believe your belief is wrong.
“network advertising “
If it is under FCC they have to air the ads.
Not wrong, just perhaps not applying to these internet bastards. We need to make it apply to these internet bastards.
(a) The Commission may revoke any station license or construction permit –(7) for willful or repeated failure to allow reasonable access to or to permit purchase of reasonable amounts of time for the use of a broadcasting station, other than a non-commercial educational broadcast station, by a legally qualified candidate for Federal elective office on behalf of his candidacy.
FB, YOUtube, Google Twitter are online companies providing a method for the public to communicate.. They sell access to post comments or “communicate” as do phone companies. That makes them public utilities and they should be enjoined from deleting comments except those which are threats against the lives of others or attempts to violate the law.
“FB, YOUtube, Google Twitter are online companies providing a method for the public to communicate.. “
So is this site. Please inform JR of your expert opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.