Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google removes 300 Donald Trump ads for ‘violating company policy’
NY Post ^ | December 2, 2019 | 1:13pm | Ebony Bowden

Posted on 12/02/2019 12:08:57 PM PST by conservative98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: conservative98

bkmk


61 posted on 12/02/2019 4:15:31 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

not familiar with him granting open communication. He publicly says it’s a conservative site.


62 posted on 12/02/2019 4:17:34 PM PST by olesigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

lasty, his number of members would not constitute monopoly or trust


63 posted on 12/02/2019 4:18:13 PM PST by olesigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

We the people own the communications spectrum

Our rights shall not be Infringed

How hard is this to understand


64 posted on 12/02/2019 4:23:30 PM PST by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: max americana

re: “it doesn’t matter anyways. Voters already made up their minds. Do you actually need an ad to vote Trump? LOL”

THINK AHEAD.

Always think ahead, for the next guy, post-Trump.


65 posted on 12/02/2019 4:29:31 PM PST by _Jim (Save babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

I guarantee the Trump ads conflicted with Google’s aim to maximize ad revenue.
Advertisers pay for sales, nothing else.
Idiots buy.

Idiots don’t like thinking. Trump makes them think. It hurts.


66 posted on 12/02/2019 4:37:22 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olesigh

“lasty, his number of members would not constitute monopoly or trust”

Who do you think has a monopoly on speech?


67 posted on 12/02/2019 4:39:24 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

BREAK IT UP!


68 posted on 12/02/2019 4:45:05 PM PST by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; azishot; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; ..

p


69 posted on 12/02/2019 4:53:05 PM PST by bitt (You can't get rich in politics unless you're a crook. Harry Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I bet that can be end run.


70 posted on 12/02/2019 5:01:20 PM PST by arthurus (cDx..c|__|///)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

when standard oil was busted up they were not 100% And the feds left Bill and Joes two gas stations alone.

Controlling political speech as G, YT, T, and FB have conspired to do at their meeting last year and this, is dangerous and in everyone but your mind and theirs constitutes a monopoly


71 posted on 12/02/2019 5:14:07 PM PST by olesigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Phil DiBasquette
We the people own the communications spectrum

How hard is this to understand

Oh, I'm in complete agreement.

One could turn the libs anti-gun argument against them (that the founding fathers couldn't foresee spray fire assault weapons and machine guns) into something like this:

The First Amendment "Press" does not mean broadcast or electronic media. When they wrote the First Amendment, the founders couldn't foresee things like socialist media monopolies, a 24-hour news cycle, spin, mass brainwashing, disinformation, psyops, and Soviet propaganda disseminated at the speed of light. In the founding era, "press" meant ink pressed onto paper, as with newspapers, pamphlets, and handbills.

Ah, if it resulted in the extinction of leftist media only, but it would be a double-edged sword.

72 posted on 12/02/2019 6:23:00 PM PST by Spirochete (GOP: Gutless Old Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Wouldn’t that be “election interference”?
They said that “Russian Facebook ads” were “interference”.


73 posted on 12/02/2019 6:40:29 PM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olesigh

I get all the news without going to those sites so they must not be a monopoly!

Besides, Trump has 68 million followers on T!


74 posted on 12/02/2019 8:12:38 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Use the Brave browser. No YouTube ads at all.


75 posted on 12/03/2019 1:12:53 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson