Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge refuses to second-guess family separations at border
ABC News ^ | January 13, 2020, 4:40 PM | Elliot Spagat - AP

Posted on 01/13/2020 5:31:03 PM PST by jazusamo

SAN DIEGO -- A federal judge ruled Monday that the Trump administration is operating within its authority when separating families stopped at the Mexican border, rejecting arguments that it was quietly returning to widespread practices that drew international condemnation.

The American Civil Liberties Union argued that the administration was splitting families over dubious allegations and minor transgressions including traffic offenses. It asked the judge in July to rule on whether the government was justified in separating 911 children during the first year after the judge halted the general practice in June 2018.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; aclu; aliens; asylum; california; danasabraw; dubyajudge; illegalaliens; immigration; judgedanasabraw; judiciary; mexico; migrants; ninthcircuit; sandiego; separatingchildren; smuggling; usdistjudgesabraw
Good for this sane judge!
1 posted on 01/13/2020 5:31:03 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

How many of those “parents” were actually mules?


2 posted on 01/13/2020 5:32:42 PM PST by MuttTheHoople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What “rights” do you have when you want to bully your way into another country? The right to not have your family separated does not exist in the Constitution or any other document that I am aware of.


3 posted on 01/13/2020 5:54:19 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Is it the current law under Bammy’s watch ?


4 posted on 01/13/2020 5:57:54 PM PST by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Good to see some black-robed tyrant cares.

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS


5 posted on 01/13/2020 6:07:25 PM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Well, as an attorney at law, I would say that under the ‘Rights of One’s Children’, the Court Ruled in the Santasky v. Kramer case that the government must prove provide “clear and convincing evidence” before permanently terminating a parent’s rights.

That said, in the aforementioned decision, the Court noted a long standing number of cases had recognized that ‘freedom of rights’. The Court noted this fundamental right falls in the passage of the 14-amendent.

In summary, the Court concluded that ‘before a State can sever completely and irrevocably the rights of parents in their natural child, due process requires that the State support its allegations by at least clear and convincing evidence,.

Did the Trump admiration follow the Courts’ rulings (?)…I am not quite sure, set aside the ACLU not-withstanding. In short, I am sure we will hear more about this matter.

6 posted on 01/13/2020 7:00:29 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

One “negative-DNA-match” child today.


7 posted on 01/13/2020 7:32:59 PM PST by Does so (...Democrats only believe in democracy when they win the election...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson