President Trump is the whistle blower. He blew the whistle on demonicRAT/Ukrainian corruption and now the whole town is in CYA mode.
The statute only protects whistleblowers from any employer revenge, it contains no restriction on naming the person
I don’t trust Roberts.
Roberts pulling another law out of his A**
What a corrupt action.
So did Roberts sleep with the Whistleblower
OR was he involved with obtaining Roberts’ children
violating laws in other countries?
Where the hell do they find in the law that this clown CIArella gets to maintain a secret identity?
This is our chief “Justice”.
The Chief Justice does not have the authority to decide which questions are asked.
Roberts earning another suitcase of cash to take to Malta after this is over?
Has this clown Roberts ever heard of a right to face your accuser? Has he ever heard of the 6th Amendment? He’s only on the Supreme Court. He only went to Harvard.
6th Amendment?
for those that are not watching
Schiff said he is perfectly willing to have Roberts rule on issues with no review of his decision and challenged GOP to do the same
C’mon, Rand - just do it. First Amendment says you can ask it. They can tell you to shut up, but putting it out there is your right.
Just ask it in the right way - make sure you tie it to his premeditated discussion with Schiff-for-brains and earlier work with Biden’s people.
This guy is NOT a whistle blower he IS a LEAKER!!!
Roberts is worse than useless. Thanks, GWB.
Essentially, Roberts is OK with Trump not being able to confront his accuser, or even know who his accuser is. Isn’t that a major part of our legal system?
It looks like Trump isn’t above the law, he is below the law.
Call Ciarella as a witness. Don’t label him as the whistleblower. Ask him on the stand what his part was.
I think John Roberts is owned by the Bush family. Still convinced that GWB told him to save Obamacare.....as a favor to Michelle no doubt.
Now This is really interesting-— Why would Roberts block a question that “purports” to name a whistleblower— when he has NO PROOF that this individual IS the so called whistleblower?
Even if it IS the whistleblower, there is NO PART of the Statute, which Roberts well knows, that requires the anonymity of the whistleblower. The Statute only protects the employee from vindictive revenge acts and career harm from the Employer, in this case the NSC and cee eye ehhhhhh.
So, WHY is it that Roberts thinks that he should not read out the name of the “whistleblower” UNLESS he is PART of this continuing coup, including his purposeful running of the FISA court, accepting false evidence for the Court. He must be part of the coup.
Must be a tax question . . .
The whistleblower and tin soldier Vindman are at the heart of this Ukraine scam. They should be compelled to testify as should Schiff as he was orchestrating the whistleblowers testimony.