John Roberts is a fake ass judge.
What a fraud.
John Roberts should resign.
I don't know how to post an article but this story is brand-new at The Hill website.
John Roberts is garbage.
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
They were really concerned about keeping Linda Tripp’s name secret.
So why is the identity of this “whistleblower” being kept secret?
I’m not going to read much into Robert’s refusal. Sounds like he headed off being manipulated into becoming a distraction by saying the jerks name for the record. Rand can easily frame his question without the name. Did any HPSCI members, staffers, associates, friends, affiliates, lawyers, or Mary McCord speak to the purported whistleblower directly or indirectly about impeachment or Trump’s calls or making a whistleblower complaint? If so, what were the full details of each occasion?
Why has the transcript of ICIG Atkinson’s testimony been withheld from the Senate? Ask one of the “defense Team that has seen the transcript what is in it.
Is John Roberts FAIR? AND UNBIASED?
I FEEL the democrat have seen every question the democrat senators were going to ask...they had notes and I saw the kid interns delivering papers to them and I feel that was HOW TO ANSWER A CERTAIN QUESTION...
SO FAKE AND SET UP TOTALLY A HOAX...THIS NEEDS TO END AND BE SHUT DOWN...DEMOCRATS ARE THE MOST EVIL PEOPLE I’VE EVER SEEN IN THE CONGRESS.
That is ONE BIG THUMB that Roberts is using.......
It’s all so silly. So why is it that those who are out to destroy the President get more rights and privileges than the President himself who I thought had very clear Executive Branch protections? Even the common person on trial gets to see the accuser and not some “secret”/not so secret a-hole who has the agenda to destroy him.
“A source confirmed” = FAKE NEWS!
Balls to the wall, Senator Paul. It’s now or never. We make a stand now, or there is no making a stand later. Sad. Hard to swallow. But that is what it comes down to. Do it.
there. fixed it.
The whistleblower committed high crimes by colluding with the Schifty head. The public deserves to know his identity and see that he pays for his crimes along with those he colluded with.
I don’t understand why questions have to be given to Roberts before they are asked. This is a trial, not a town hall meeting. If someone asks a question the other side doesn’t particularly like, they can object, and then argue it out in front of Roberts, who can then make a decision whether the question can stand or not.
It’s hard to believe, at this juncture, but there are those “in the know” who either do not believe all this is going on in the upper echelons of government.. before Trump’s.... or refuse to let it be discussed for fear of making it true.
Much like the ones who have been made public in the Hollywood arena... and finally meeting justice.. that it was always known about who they were and no one did anything... it was silenced or accepted and the world went on.
Roberts and others... may know all this and not want it to be discussed, for that would make it true and then something would have to be done with the guilty. And it’s been said no one would go after the past President.. just imagine what would take place in the people’s arena if they took Obama in … you think his “people” would be nice about it?
What do they do when the highest in the land... is found guilty from evidence and no one has the guts to even talk about it.
Here’s an idea I’ve had for awhile. Why not ask questions about Eric Ciaramella? No need to associate him with being the whistleblower.
How can anyone object? If they do, THEY would be confirming that HE is the whistleblower.