Hillary can now be considered lawfully served.
Publication in via a high profile news network is more than sufficient to satisfy the requirements of reasonable notice to defendants.
It’s hard to imagine members of the Bar doing sillier things than trying to ‘refuse’ service. It’s an option they don’t have, as officers of the court.
Wouldn’t Tulsi Gabbard’s lawyers know that? If you are right and Hillary is considered lawfully served then what is the point of the article?